Sentences with phrase «not with public money»

In order to placate the party, the new stations will be built not with public money but with private investment.

Not exact matches

Vettese says the proposed changes would be unpopular with the general public and wouldn't net federal coffers much money anyway.

for Transport, the public must question every major transport project as spending 2.2 billion dollars on the Forrestfield - Airport rail link is a grotesque waste of money which can not be justified with our very low population density and simply needs an efficient bus system at a fraction of the cost similar to that servicing Melbourne's Tullarmarine Airport.

«Obviously they're not going to attract that much money, but they're becoming more of a legitimate foundation with a professional staff,» said Pablo Eisneberg, senior fellow at the Center for Public and Nonprofit Leadership Center at Georgetown University.

While Facebook went public with the intention of connecting the world to better connect consumers, its goal now is to make money, which has caused Facebook to not be as stringent in its policies as to how other companies advertise on the platform, Greenfield said.

Federal government is concerned with public, not private, business as it relates to power, money and the stock market.

For people living in rural areas, where wait times for driverless Uber or any kind of public transit are completely unreasonable, yet don't have money to burn an extra $ 10k on their car to make it autonomous, will continue to buy old - fashioned human - driven cars with gas pedals and steering wheels long into the future — and will not accept not being able to drive their cars into cities.

This has some observers asking if we're not seeing something resembling the 1990s tech bubble, when valuations ballooned, a few major tech giants led the way, and companies with no prospects to make money went public.

I think a significant proportion of the UK public with money looking for yield are ploughing into property rather than the stock market, as it seems to be built in to the British psyche that you can't lose with housing.

As for the U.S., I'd actually be quite comfortable with a reasonable amount of «helicopter money» provided that the accompanying fiscal stimulus package was focused, not on consumption, but on productive investment at the public, private and individual level (infrastructure, investment and R&D tax credits, workforce training, education, and so forth).

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.

Though churches are entitled, unlike other private employers, to hire with their own money their own members in preference to others, they are not entitled to do so with the public's money.

The point is is that it IS wrong to force someone not to talk about their god, but that it is ALSO wrong to take money from someone who doesn't believe in that god by force (e.g., taxation) and then turn around and give that money to someone who does to promote their views about that religion (such as funding a memorial with public funds).

I don't really have a dog in this fight, but the point is that it shouldn't be paid for with public money unless you are going to be buying burkhas and yarmulkes and buddhas as well.

The Port Authority says, in essence, that a window has passed for the church to rebuild at a nearby location with tens of millions of dollars of public money because construction at a security center at ground zero couldn't wait.

It wouldn't matter that they think the world is 6000 years old if they didn't demand that we teach that nonsense in public schools, with public money.

Should I have the money, and a child in the public education system, I belive I could take the issue to court and win that educators must always preface any remark that deals with the theory of evolution with statements such as: «it is thought» or «there is reason to believe» or some or qualifying statement indicating that it is just a theory, not fact.

Osteen probably won't care since like may other televangelists he seems to be obsessed with money, then again, that is fine with me, is his money and is his soul, as well as the money and the souls of those who believe on him, just don't expect any of my money or my respect... and certainly I am free to criticize his public actions, is a free county and he opened the door to it with his public exposition... judgment is another thing, that I leave to God, at difference off him I not presume to have the true interpretation of His / Her wishes.

During the regular season, sportsbooks almost always adjust their lines based on the action of their sharpest bettors, and they won't move the number based on public money unless there's a marquee matchup with one - sided public betting and limited sharp action on the other side.

Books are probably happy that the Steelers are a public team, and they won't simply get hammered with Patriots money again.

This influx of bets and public money on one side ends up creating value on the other side; the line may move and sharps will come in to grab it, or the line won't move and sportsbooks will end up with more liability on the public side.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Sitting on the sofa, I show him a few items: newspaper and magazine pieces about the Liston fights; Ali's conversion to Islam; the arrest for refusing military induction; the epic first battle with Frazier; the Supreme Court overturning the draft conviction; Foreman being voodooed by Ali; the Thrilla in Manila; the boxing lesson he gave Spinks in their second contest; a recent article about Ali buying buses for Chicago - area public schools (immediately after seeing a TV news story about how Dade County had no money for new buses, Ali sat down, wrote a check and mailed it, not using the gift as a tax deduction); and one about helping a young man wearing a hooded dark sweatshirt and jeans who crawled out on a high window ledge of a Wilshire Boulevard skyscraper in Los Angeles to kill himself.

With many people traveling Wednesday, don't be surprised to see an influx of public money come down on this game from early tomorrow morning right up until kickoff.

With balanced public betting, limited line movement and no betting systems triggered, it doesn't look like sharp money has taken a side on tonight's spread.

I understand that Formula One is important but with private money, not public money.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

With such limited volume, sportsbooks haven't been forced to adjust their lines based on public money.

Oddsmakers won't adjust their numbers based on public money unless there's massive liability on one side; however, with more casual bettors entering the marketplace for these marquee matchups, it's far more common for sportsbooks adjust for public action.

With that edict in place on Wednesday, the R&A probably wasn't thrilled to see a pair of Northern Irishmen exchange some money in a very entertaining and public way.

Not surprisingly, the Raptors opened as 6.5 - point favorites at the market - setting Pinnacle sportsbook and they have been pounded with public money.

With such a large selection of games, SportsInsights.com is able to focus not only on games that the Public loves, but also games that indicate the existence of Smart money and Sharps.

Fort Bragg doesn't suffer from that problem, but the use of public money brings with it other problems.

It's rare that we will recommend betting with the public, but we can't ignore sharp money indicators on the Irish.

Playoff betting trends are drastically due in large part due to the increase of public money hitting the market, but if dogs with low totals aren't profitable we wanted to determine the sweet spot for playoff betting.

In other words, sportsbooks almost always adjust their lines based on the action of their sharpest bettors, and they won't move the number based on public money unless there's a marquee matchup with one - sided public betting and limited sharp action on the other side.

When the simple analysis of the line moving against the public (sharp money), lines up with this idea of satisfying a +7.5 layoff, by an 8 - 9 point spread, and at the same time not having to pay out the action at +9.5... (a form of a middle)...

I would not be surprised to see this price to continue to drop as Sunday approaches with large sums of money coming in on «Yes» from the public.

The NCAA tournament doesn't start until next week but Championship Week provides plenty of opportunities with public money flooding the market.

With this many wagering options and the public betting like mad, it's not uncommon to see prop lines move on public money alone.

I just know I personally would not send my kid to an all - day government - run pre-K and the state of the U.S. economy and public schools such as they are right now, I don't think adding more responsibilities to them and throwing more money at them is something I'm on board with.

Of course, if Nestlé and Danone are serious about wanting to have a positive impact on public health then there is something they can do that won't require lavishing money on health workers: they can market their breastmilk substitutes in accordance with the minimum standards.

Chicago Public Schools won an extra $ 11 million from the state to expand preschool programs for disadvantaged children next school year, but the district doesn't plan to create new programs with the money.

Yet, not all such investments have been benign: a Chinese property developer with connections to the Communist Party, Huang Xiangmo, provided gifts and money to Australian Senator Sam Dastyari, who advanced Chinese interests in the public sphere and provided Xiangmo with counter-intelligence advice.

Their rags - to - riches stories give them credibility in connecting with impoverished voters and in claiming to not need to steal any public money because they are already wealthy.

Susan Lerner, Executive Director of Common Cause / NY, noted that «Hydraulic fracturing has been one of the most polarizing issues in recent history, with no shortage of political money invested by pro-fracking interests to achieve a favorable outcome... New York State needs comprehensive campaign finance and lobbying reform to assure New Yorkers that public policy is based on their interest, not the special interests.»

And the statewide public housing group she works with persuaded Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo last year to put $ 2 billion in his budget for public housing improvements throughout New York, including Buffalo, although the State Legislature did not yet agree to free up the money.

«Whatever it is you think state government should or shouldn't be doing, with public financing you have a much better chance of having your voice and your neighbors» voices heard and not drowned out by big money,» Scharff said.

The problem with PFI though, is that the price attached to the outcomes doesn't convince the public that they get value for the money it eventually costs them.