A systematic review of published studies on the use of medical cannabis in children and adolescents finds
a notable lack of studies and a minimal number of the randomized, controlled trials needed to confirm the effectiveness of a treatment.
Not exact matches
With a few
notable exceptions, primarily in the context
of constitutional reform in western Europe and in the post-Soviet world, genuinely comparative
studies of the origins and consequences
of constitutional transformation and judicial empowerment are still rare, and often
lack coherent methodology.
Two
notable limitations
of the
study are its reliance on participant self - report and the
lack of a no - treatment control group.
Notable limitations
of the
study include the
lack of a no - treatment control condition, the homogeneity
of the sample (all Hispanic), as well as small sample size.
A
notable lack is in the area
of large - scale mixed - method qualitative and process
studies of adolescent sexual behavior and consequences, particularly
studies that include in - depth, valid measures
of social and institutional context that can be linked to quantitative outcomes.
Limitations included the inability to
study teen mothers» child care capacity, a
notable number
of dropouts particularly in the HFA group, most measures were a type
of self - report, and the
study lacked evaluators blind to the HFA group.
The least frequent outcome measure used was well - being, explored by only one
study (Lowyck et al., 2009), revealing a
notable lack of published research that has explored positive aspects
of emotional adjustment, such as life satisfaction, happiness, well - being or marital quality.
A
notable limitation in the majority
of studies (n = 11) was the
lack of description
of possible confounding variables in either the methodological design or analysis
of the
studies.