As you'll
note on climate blogs, there is a great deal of repetition, people will go from blog to blog posting the same beliefs and opinions, sometimes for years without changing anything they believe or opine.
Not exact matches
I had just been in a discussion of
climate change
on a messageboard where someone had triumphantly put up links to various
blogs (including one that you
noted here) drawing conclusions about the cause of the global warming here
on earth
on the basis of these recent measurements of Mars's south polar cap!
Earthjustice (the legal arm of the Sierra Club) has said
on their website in the «
Climate Change Denial — A Note to Journalists» section: «For the latest and best information on global warming we recommend Realclimate.org a new blog edited by working climate scientists not corporate lobbyists&
Climate Change Denial — A
Note to Journalists» section: «For the latest and best information
on global warming we recommend Realclimate.org a new
blog edited by working
climate scientists not corporate lobbyists&
climate scientists not corporate lobbyists».
Since October, an apocalyptic message has been making the rounds of anti-nuclear
blogs, crystallized in this headline
on a post by longtime anti-nuclear campaigner Harvey Wasserman: «Dear
Climate Scientists, Please
Note the Global Terror at Fukushima Four.»
On that note, I am going to look at this new blog with great interest on the Global Climate Models, and refrain from rhetoric
On that
note, I am going to look at this new
blog with great interest
on the Global Climate Models, and refrain from rhetoric
on the Global
Climate Models, and refrain from rhetoric:)
Now,
noting my call this week for the
climate panel and the countries that created it to get serious about communication, Carr, who is currently
on leave working with the U.S. Agency for International Development, has weighed in afresh
on his
blog,
noting the importance of openness and outreach for both the
climate panel and the many academic institutions involved in
climate research.
The Editors»
Note below has been appended to «Industry Ignored Its Scientists
on Climate» and the related
blog post from last week.
Last year, the
noted (and controversial)
climate scientist Michael Mann sued National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress for
blog posts written by Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg and posted
on National Review Online and CEI's OpenMarket
blog, respectively.
I
noted (as I have previously in this
blog) the large number of states that are either divided
on or hostile about claims of human - caused global warming that are nonetheless hotbeds of collective activity focused
on counteracting the adverse impacts of
climate change, including sea level rise.
Daily Beast described
Climate Depot as «a bustling, one - stop - shop for climate skeptics» and noted that Climate Depot is «bringing in more visitors than RedState.com, one of the most popular conservative blogs on the web.
Climate Depot as «a bustling, one - stop - shop for
climate skeptics» and noted that Climate Depot is «bringing in more visitors than RedState.com, one of the most popular conservative blogs on the web.
climate skeptics» and
noted that
Climate Depot is «bringing in more visitors than RedState.com, one of the most popular conservative blogs on the web.
Climate Depot is «bringing in more visitors than RedState.com, one of the most popular conservative
blogs on the web.»
He is an expert
on the
climate in outer space, as his
blog so clearly
notes, and he knows the difference between the weather and
climate in this realm.
I know NOAA says the decade saw warming of.2 °C, but it's fairly obvious that this number was a result of some major «adjustments» to the models, given that, as
noted in the
blog above, everyone, including major
climate alarmists like Phil Jones and Tim Flannery, had accepted that the planet did not warm,
on average, for the decade.
Graham Readfearn comments
on the piece in an article in The Guardian,
noting that Evans's theory had arose from a series of over 11
blog posts he had
on his wife's
blog (JoNova) where Evans claims to have found fundamental problems with
climate models.
As
noted previously
on this
blog, when hurricane damages are adjusted («normalized») to account for changes in population, per capita income, and the consumer price index, there is no long - term trend such as might indicate an increase in hurricane frequency or power related to global
climate change.
Note also that in their post-Frontline damage control efforts, the
climate denialists continued to repeat the «no consensus» myth ad nauseam, including in three seperate blog posts on WattsUpWithThat alone — by the Heartland Institute, its director Joe Bast, and International Climate Science Coalition director Tom
climate denialists continued to repeat the «no consensus» myth ad nauseam, including in three seperate
blog posts
on WattsUpWithThat alone — by the Heartland Institute, its director Joe Bast, and International
Climate Science Coalition director Tom
Climate Science Coalition director Tom Harris.
[Norm's
note: Originally published by Judith Curry
on her
blog,
Climate Etc..