Not exact matches
In fact he's
noted that the IPCC reports themselves describe a «vast array of
uncertainties», but at the same time give rise to «well - supported concern that increasing emissions of CO2 (in particular) are posing a
substantial risk to human society».
In 1991, the language was already strong and urgent,
noting that the risks were sufficient to justify action even with
substantial unanswered questions: «Despite the great
uncertainties, greenhouse warming is a potential threat sufficient to justify action now.»
One evident gap I've
noted off and on is the lack of a
substantial focus on how humans perceive and respond to long - term and
uncertainty - laden environmental risks.
In fact he's
noted that the IPCC reports themselves describe a «vast array of
uncertainties», but at the same time give rise to «well - supported concern that increasing emissions of CO2 (in particular) are posing a
substantial risk to human society».
Public Staff is among many critics who
noted that the plan lacks sufficient detail, citing in testimony «
substantial uncertainty regarding what exactly will be included.»