Not exact matches
The MIT letter
noted that professional societies including the American Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Union have all released
statements affirming the scientific
consensus on man - made climate change and its grave risks.
In 2001, the
consensus statement by the Growth Hormone Research Society
noted that the data demonstrate that the concern for increasing the risk of cancer with the use of growth hormone is unfounded:
In 2004 the secretariat was warned by the SBI on its role as an impartial actor (after the Executive Director attended an international energy conference to endorse renewable energy) when it formally «took
note of the concern expressed that officials of the secretariat should take care in their public
statements to reflect the views of parties held by
consensus, and not to appear to support only one side or another on contentious issues.»
«In considering any claim to scientific
consensus, it seems appropriate to
note the following
statement by Dr Benjamin Santer, author of the 2007 IPCC report chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming — who is not a sceptic (to my knowledge): «It's unfortunate that many people read the media hype before they read the chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming.
Hi Heiko, I am curious as to your take on this comment from early in the document referring to some quoted
statements of the
consensus: These references fail to
note that there are many sources of climate change, and that profound climate change occurred many times both before and after man appeared on earth.