Sentences with phrase «nothing about a trend»

Cherrypicking two dates tells nothing about trend.

Notice we know nothing about trend to green beyond 2006.

Many of the people who have posted about a flat trend are posting HADCRUT, which of course says nothing about a trend in BEST data.

Re Bopha, yes it was unusual in a couple of ways (low latitude, lateish) but it says nothing about trends.

-LSB-[That being the case you can say NOTHING about any trend in this data set [i.e., 2001 - 2007] except that the data indicates no change in temperature over that period.

That being the case you can say NOTHING about any trend in this data set except that the data indicates no change in temperature over that period.

I stated nothing about a trend line through the data.

Not exact matches

It's been quite a tumultuous week in the markets, as we all know, but something seems amiss... on Thursday when the Bank of England's Mark Carney talked about raising rates faster than expected, the pound popped (as one would expect) but it did not take even a few hours for it to completely reverse trend as if nothing happened, and the USD was back to being strong again.

I certainly appreciate your confidence in me, but here's the thing: There's a double - standard out there in which a woman's critique of patriarchy tends to get discounted as nothing more than the rants of an «angry feminist,» and, truth be told, I've grown a bit weary of hearing that charge each time I speak out about this disturbing trend in the evangelical church.

And while we're not sure we'll be walking around the streets of New York City with an inflatable giraffe anytime soon, it's clear there's nothing understated about this fall's top trends or the beauty of the one and only Nina Agdal!

Other times, trends move in strange extremes, moving from one acceptable course of action (posting everything about one's children online) to another, opposite acceptable course of action (posting nothing about one's children online).

This trend is nothing to be concerned about.

Perhaps, like the trend of denial among conservative white males, there is nothing too surprising about that conclusion.

Since the 1998, Michaels has insisted that temperature trends can be simply be linearly extrapolated out to 2050 and further and that the resulting (small) changes are nothing to be concerned about.

Well well, one of the trends for fall 2017 is to do nothing about the hair.

Online shopping has become a trend as it allows you to buy your favorite things at the comfort of home while you sit in your couch wearing comfortable clothes, listening to your favorite song however nothing can replace the experience of buying in a physical store, especially if we are talking about shoes.

If you struggle with limited resources, «nothing to wear» problem, or you are just curious about current fashion trends, then I am sure you'll like it here.

ANYWAY, I posted about burnout (in general, not the popular apparel trend) back in December (catch up here), but interestingly enough, this burnout has nothing to do with my 9 - 5 job... in fact that couldn't be in a better place.

When I am relaxing, yet still need to dress decently in order to go about town running errands etc., nothing beats the current athleisure trend.

When younger men are known to talk about nothing but sports, trends and other shallow thoughts; they won't even know how to take care of a child, cook a meal for their own, or even just to sustain a relevant conversation.

There's nothing particularly new about the idea of a quirky and exciting female character who only exists to facilitate the aspirations of men, but Rabin identified a particular trend in American cinema over the last decade that framed itself as independent and an alternative to Hollywood.

I'm not talking about Hot and Trending books, because you can buy nominations and it means nothing.

There's nothing typical about this book, and Dahl's debut is all the better for its willingness to blend its Scandinavian roots with a modern, on - trend psychological suspense plot.

@davmp - reading Marks comments above he mentions nothing about momentum trading, he just talks about the current trend.

Unlike when I wrote about an actual observable and investable trend of investing on the 1st day of the month (there was a very pronounced positive alpha play here before the mainstream media caught wind of it primarily because of 1st of month fund flows from 401 (k) s, pension plans, etc.), there is nothing here for Tuesdays I'm sad to say.

I use the SMA of 120, there is nothing magical about this number you could probably use 115 or 125 and be just fine but I'm looking for the overall trend in the stock.

The truth about trend following is that 70 - 75 % of the time nothing happens.

Successful trend followers have internalized that it is nothing about being right or predicting... it is to identify where they are located currently in relation to the trend and just take the trade if they have one.»

While the current trend in dog training seems very «positive» and forward thinking, these methods often end in the euthanasia of the when they fail and there is nothing positive about that.

It might be tempting to lump her in with the widespread trend of faux - naïve that has been pervasive in the last decade, but there is nothing «faux» about her paintings.

It might be tempting to lump Sarah in with the widespread trend of «faux - naïve» that has been pervasive in the last decade, but there is nothing «faux» about her paintings.

If it hadn't been for that relatively short - term trend, no one would even be talking about global warming today, because there is nothing alarming about the very modest warming we've experienced since.

On # 72: Gavin, isn't the real point that the magnitude of individual year deviations from the (rising) trend says nothing about the «exceptionality of recent warming»?

Those who think that there's nothing to worry about, because sea ice might recover on its own accord, are requiring some negative forcing or feedback effect to come into play, to make the PIOMAS trend line do a U-turn.

And for those who don't deny the temperature trend, the usual fallback position IS that it's not our fault (with the next fallback of «oh well, there's nothing we can do about it»).

Just a meaningless graph between two points that shows nothing of value for establishing any kind of trend about the climate.

It knows nothing about any «kinks» or other nonlinearities which may exist between the end - points, and the presence of these makes the resulting trend line misleading.

The divergence of the temperture trends from models is interesting but says absolutely nothing about whether those models have the basic AGW physics correct.

Mind you, when modern CAGW is shown to be nothing more than a continuation of a 350 year warming trend what will we find to talk about?.

There is nothing particularly deceptive about having a thicker trend line on a plot.

A transect would tell us nothing about whether there are urban impacts on large scale or global TRENDS.

There is nothing more that needs to be said about this graph, except to have a good laugh at those who claim it does not show a significant warming trend.

Let me add that the Chief is 100 % correct in saying that all this talk about 10 or 20 - year trends is actually meaningless, since nothing under 65 years or so really means anything.

Dr. Whitehouse can try and head this argument off at the pass about using previous years as starting points by calling this «cherry picking» but that's - nothing - compared to the slight - of - hand it takes to present this amount of data as if it were a meaningful representation of climate trends.

So no, there's nothing misleading about analyzing the trends in this case.

Leaving aside the problem of cherry - picking, even if you got a perfect match between the observed trend and that from model run # 1008, it tells you nothing whatsover about the model as a scientific tool, because you are not testing the model, you are just testing a list of numbers that came out of it.

Analysis of the growth rate might tell you what causes the variability around the long term trend, but it tells you nothing about the long term trend as the differencing operation used to get the growth rate makes the long term trend dissapear.

It is a confirmation of the results also found by other studies before, with varying methodology, that the recent alleged «pause» is very likely, to a large degree, nothing more than just a temporary downward deviation from the median trend by chance, mostly due to the chaotic ENSO variability imprinting itself on the global temperature trends, like the «acceleration» between 1992 and 2007 (with a trend of about 0.25 - 0.3 deg.

It is well known that volcanic eruptions and e.g. ENSO are well correllated with the growth rate; it is also well known thatthis tells you precisely nothing about the long term trend as the differencing operation used to obtain the growth rate obliterates the long term trend.

The correlation observed by Salby tells absolutely nothing about the mechanisms behind the long term trend.