Note that we are not doing
nothing about access to justice.
Not exact matches
They have «
Access to Justice» committees, and they express «concern»
about the problem, but
nothing has happened during all the decades during which this problem has been inflicting more damage in one day than have all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers in the whole history of Canada, coast
to coast
to coast.
repeatedly used as an example of a barrier
to access to justice when the litigator saying it has
nothing at all
to say
about the ruinously high cost of litigation,
to have the Law Society spend all this time and effort on ABS while spending comparatively little time on investigating how
to realistically reduce the cost of litigation.
Since ABS does next
to nothing and perhaps
nothing about the time and cost of litigation, and since that is where the real barrier
to access to justice lies, explain what you would do
to deal with the time and cost of litigation.
Further, they fail
to realize that (1) every single benefit they extol can be achieved without selling our ownership, and (2) ABS does
nothing about the one gigantic barrier
to access to justice - the ruinous time and cost of litigation.
If we are serious
about access to justice, we should throw out the existing civil rules and return
to a rule book with
nothing but the essentials:... Our trial and pre-trial procedures, like most things in life, have developed an excess of appendages and fluff over time.
The real barrier
to access to justice is overwhelmingly (
nothing else comes remotely close) the time and cost of litigation, and ABS will do precisely
nothing about it.