You all clearly know
nothing about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints.
People who say religious dialog is more vitriolic than ever know
nothing about church history.
A couple weeks ago it occurred to me that I know next to
nothing about church history.
Either you know
nothing about the Church and are just pushing your own agenda without any facts, or... you know the facts and choose to misrepresent them in order to fit your agenda.
Not exact matches
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the
church's say
nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in
church and living in sin, talk
about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..
Most of the students, I among them, knew almost
nothing about him, hut he was quickly to become a central figure in theological controversies that were raging within the Lutheran
Church - Missouri Synod» controversies centering especially on the seminary in St. Louis.
Many LDS
Church members, in fact, object to these people calling themselves fundamentalist «Mormons» as they feel there is
nothing Mormon
about them.
Not one word
about the man, what he loved to do, how he lived his life,
nothing... just promotion of the catholic
church and the lead priest prancing around in his robes with a microphone like a freakin rock star.
Considering it was a Mormon missionary who befriended my Grandfather and talked him into to joining the
church at 70 years old, and than stole a million dollars worth of real estate from him, something the family knew
nothing about until he was on his death bed, because he was too ashamed to tell anybody that he lost the family property.
sorry to have used the term «common»... you're so right, there is
nothing common
about pedophiles especially when they use their delusions to cover it up and hide it behind a
church
I mentioned
nothing in my post
about the
Church, per se.
In just
about all my career, the historic
churches have been in decline, their place being taken by «evangelical»
churches which seem like
nothing more than Tea Partiers at prayer.
You notice she said
nothing about millennials turning their backs on God or Jesus, just the
church.
The
church has
nothing to say
about protecting children..
The rest of what happened with the
churches is man made egos and has
nothing to do with Jesus» truth, except He warned
about all this in His letter to all of us (the Bible).
These middle - class, idealistic
church people entered a tangled world of hate and oppression most of them knew little or
nothing about.
But now that same - sex marriage is considered legal, the
church's leaders wanted to clarify that a marriage license cures
nothing about the relationship.
Thus, metaphors and models of God are understood to be discovered as well as created, to relate to God's reality not in the sense of being literally in correspondence with it, but as versions or hypotheses of it that the community (in this case, the
church) accepts as relatively adequate.16 Hence, models of God are not simply heuristic fictions; the critical realist does not accept the Feuerbachian critique that language
about God is
nothing but human projection.
According to the book, the Vatican had knowledge of multiple cases of sexual abuse committed by Maciel decades ago, but
church authorities chose to do
nothing about it.
I certainly appreciate your confidence in me, but here's the thing: There's a double - standard out there in which a woman's critique of patriarchy tends to get discounted as
nothing more than the rants of an «angry feminist,» and, truth be told, I've grown a bit weary of hearing that charge each time I speak out
about this disturbing trend in the evangelical
church.
The wildly revolutionary Christians, on the other hand, must be patiently taught that also today and in the future the
Church is an authoritatively teaching «absolute system», and that we can modestly yet frankly make only those objections to it which she formally recognizes as belonging to this system, even though
nothing is said
about their contents.
Ye t the Council said
nothing at all
about facing the people, and its permission (not requirement) for use of the vernacular included the expectation that Latin and the musical treasury of the
Church would also continue in use as a normal part of parish life.
The believers in Christ, the saints in Christ, the
church of God has
nothing to worry
about these.
For in a material sense
nothing has yet been decided negatively
about a democratic structure of the
Church, just as little as in the case of a secular constitution which forbids the destruction of the democratic system and thus limits the possible will of the citizens.
I don't want to go on and on
about this but over the years I have observed that one of the biggest causes of ridiculous antics in the
church and the rise of various cults has been people running away with ideas
about eschatological events which are
nothing more than pure imagination.
There is
nothing unsatisfying
about the council documents» description of the laity, religious, and clergy, especially when the documents indeed reiterated the importance of a lay participation in the
Church.
But if your Gospel presentation is putting your moralistic crowd to sleep, or if a pharisaic friend is more concerned
about proper speech than an addiction to grace, then you may need to tell him that his Christ-less
church attendance is
nothing more than a bloody tampon until he clings to the Cross, as Isaiah did (Isaiah 64:6).
Earlier,
nothing was known
about it except the fact that it was used by several heretical groups such as the Naassenes; some
church writers denounced it but did not describe it.
We may begin, for example, with a certain tradition within the
Church of England, in which the minister or priest performed his liturgical, homiletical, and pastoral duties, and perhaps even did spots of reading
about them, but in which his serious continuing intellectual work along some particular line might have little or
nothing to do with theology.
There is
nothing holy or sanctified
about the
church building, any more than there is anything holy or sanctified
about the school gymnasium or hotel conference room.
«Of course there is
nothing I can do
about war,» the pastor of a small
church declared.
In her 1992 book The God of Thinness, Mary Louise Bringle similarly denounced the Christian diet industry for «feeding off the facile conflation of fat and sin (and forgetting that the traditional teachings of the
church condemn consumptive behaviors but say
nothing about cosmetic matters of body shape and size).»
Up to to the age of 21 I knew
nothing about Jesus Christ, the Bible, the Cross, the general
Church, etc. in the midst of «Christian» Germany (meanwhile it became clear for me that German Christianity is only nominal to a large extent).
He said that God was not tangible and that it was disconcerting to hear other people at
church talking
about «what God told them» or «what God thought» when he was hearing...
nothing.
Every time the Catholic
Church is mentioned you all slither out of your ponds to kick up
about something you know
nothing about.
I believe with all of my heart that the world, and the
Church, benefit from diversity, and there is
nothing wrong or selfish
about advocating for that.
one of mine said «burn
church» I didn't ever know of this sin until recently and knew
nothing about my religion I said to him you know I didn't mean that he said yes and I never really thought
about it until now I prayed God to forgive me for all of my Sins I don't even know has many times but not once thought
about this I had no intention to go against him and I repented for it not long after I thought of it but what bothers me is I didn't know of this sin and wasn't ever worried I honestly had absolutely no intention behind it and never thought
about it have I commited this sin?
Consider the case of our neighbor who knew almost
nothing about Christianity and who had never attended a
church service of any kind.
First of all, I want to assert that if these people moved here and became a part of our
church, they would in soon realize that there is
nothing spectacular
about it.
I hope that when I'm through this phase, I expect absolutely
nothing of them (including the minister / s of the
church I eventually find my way back to), and it's all
about Jesus.
The principal points Paul made in that address are (1) to recall to their minds the character and quality of his ministry to them; (2) to remind them of the trouble the Jews gave him and the anxiety and suffering he underwent in their behalf; (3) to state that he preached repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the essence of the gospel; (4) to testify that he went now to Jerusalem not knowing what would happen to him there except that he knew by the Holy Spirit that afflictions awaited him; (5) to assure them that
nothing concerned him, not even the loss of life itself, so long as he could testify to the grace of God in Jesus Christ; (6) to say that he had no regrets
about his ministry to the people in Ephesus, for he was clean of the blood of all the people there, for he preached the full gospel to all of them; and (7) to admonish them to be diligent in their oversight of the Ephesian
church and to feed the
church of God there, which Christ purchased with his own blood.
I would encourage you not to distance yourself from the things
about Jesus that you have a hard time with but to instead hold all of these things in tension because
nothing less than this is required if we are to be the
church in the midst of a watching world.
Nothing wrong with either — but
churches that sing two hymns and three seventies - era choruses on Sunday may have a harder time relating to
church plants in Europe that talk
about missional incarnational witness, acts of mercy to advance the Kingdom, and planting
churches that multiply.
Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend
church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry
about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do
nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another
church i attend multiple
churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz
Otherwise, the
churches of the Christian tradition will have
nothing to say to religious seekers in a culture where people are free to believe anything they wish
about God... and do.
your a fraud, we all see through your bs... another catholic that tries to redirect the topic off the fact that the
church has had ped priests, known
about, and done
nothing about it, and lied
about it...
There is
nothing overstated
about the formula of the
church — it is devoid of a rock band or complex visuals — but at its heart is a culturally relevant message delivered by Keller from week to week.
I «am sorry this so called
church should be stripped of its tax exemt status emiadiately and Mr libertarian there is
nothing rational
about that hateful Westboro.
It means
nothing when preachers pontificate
about greed — when greed is one of the cornerstones of most
churches.
While I can read
church history and come to the conclusion that for a very long time the
church has been
about lots of things that had little or
nothing to do with Jesus, in my own time I can see it with my own eyes.