Sentences with phrase «nothing about contract»

There is probably nothing about a contract, whether it is a lease, a financing contract, or a life insurance policy, Â that worries people more than the fine print.

There was nothing about his contract with KHI that would have required or permitted that activity.

Contacted 10 days ago, Leroux said she knew nothing about the contract and wasn't involved with any of the SPCA's animal control responsibilities.

I note he's implying he will be there next season but there is nothing about contract talks or and extension.

Not exact matches

When some questions were raised about aspects of a particular North African contract on another occasion, nothing was done.

Some recent Arsenal transfer rumours have suggested that the Chilean is wanted by La Liga giants Real Madrid but according to a Metro report, we have nothing to worry about as Alexis is actually looking to sign a contract extension and is determined to stay at Arsenal and win the EPL title.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

«There's nothing new, there have been a lot of things said and written about a new contract but the only confirmed situation is that there is nothing new.

So pissed they re-signed Kilgore for starter money then traded him to the Dolphins for nothing and the Dolphins took 100 % of the costs of the contract that I was pissed about of the player I was pissed about re-signing.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

Arsenal fans need to be assured that there is nothing to worry about regarding Alexis Sanchez and although there doesn't seem to be any signs of the Chile international actually leaving the club any time soon, a lack of a rumoured contract extension does concern some.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

so a player who feels what and how the fans feel about the mediocrity of the club is now slated to be bigger than the club... wenger spent a donkey years at the club and won nothing yet he stays in fat contracts and yet he is not bigger than the club, remember last season when he complained that the salaries of the emirates workers was affecting the club transfer... imagine what a joke arsenal has become... admin pls think of something better to write about and leave sanchez out of this... van pussy was a legend...

Wenger signs a new contract whenever he wants too and there is nothing us fans can do about it?

At the same time there have been media reports over the last few weeks about the excellent Dimitri Payet being possibly ready to move on, but Wenger and Arsenal did nothing and now he has agreed a new contract.

Surely before they gave him this new two year contract there was some talk about what would happen if nothing improved.

* we can not know about ozils contract situation IF our source is Mirror News Snippets which far as detailed accounts go, its a source that gives us nothing substantive.

Whether it's Gazidis making ridiculous claims about our supposedly successful transfer window, even going so far as to suggest that everything went according to plann, or it's Wenger having the audacity to speak about taking a much more proactive approach to the re-signing of players with less than 2 years left on their current deals; which on it's own is a nothing story, it's football management 101, but let's not forget just a few weeks ago he was proudly championing his «ingenious» plan of having his best players playing in the last year of their respective contracts.

nothing about this is consistent with someone who just wants a bigger contract or a trade.

Hiddink is yet to sign a new deal to stay on with Russia but BBC Radio 5 Live football correspondent Jonathan Legard said: «His agent says there is nothing suspicious about the unsigned contract.

This summer could be even more painful as we can not offer Champions league football to attract top players and we still know nothing about the new contracts of our star players.

I think that Arsenal and Arsene Wenger are going to have a tough task persuading our star striker to stay at Arsenal and sign a new contract, and that is what is going to have to happen because despite the strong words about not letting him go I really can not see our club turning down something like # 50 million and then losing the player in just a year from now for nothing.

NOW who instructed the board to pay Walnut his shameless wages, renewing Contracts to players long gone their prime, keeping players that were a promise 10 years ago and 10 years later they have brought nothing, promising he could bring results with the current team, this is WENGER fault and no one else... tired of hearing from pundits and other team fans about our players fragile state of mind... WTF the responsible of the team mentality is who controls the dressing room not the board.....

Chelsea came in early and signed Kante, while rumours about Mahrez and Vardy leaving finally ended with them signing new deals (but, as a West Ham fan, I know contracts mean nothing nowadays — see Dimitri Payet signing a new five - year deal just six months before going on strike and leaving the club).

This means he can walk away from Arsenal for nothing at the end of his deal and he can talk to clubs from January about discussing a contract with them.

However, he did issue a bit of an alarming situation when asked about his future at the Emirates Stadium as he spoke to BT Sport saying,» Nothing to comment on at the moment, I think they've been busy to tie up other contracts at the moment.»

Just before United kicked off against Bournemouth, it was announced that 17 - year - old Angel Gomes had signed his first professional contract with the club, something which many, including myself, were worried about as nothing seemed to be developing quickly after the player returned from England U17 duty after winning the FIFA U17 World Cup.

Sadly, two high court judges took the view that there was nothing illegal about the contracts for emergency solicitors in police stations and magistrates» courts and that it isn't their job to interfere with government policy.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo says he knew nothing about a bill he signed — a bill that News Corp. lobbied on before the company gave Cuomo a lucrative book contract.

Two weeks later, the comptroller's office wrote back with questions about both the waiver and the contract, including concerns that it required virtually nothing in terms of a final report and included an option to extend the contract «by mutual consent» with no end date.

Cuomo would have us believe that three of his closest associates took actions that resulted in the awarding of state contracts to two of his largest campaign contributors and he knew nothing about it.

And, again, there's no practical reason they shouldn't because there's nothing about that pre-K program that this contract stands in the way of operating.»

Dr. Jones tells you that they have no record of any stock option grant and there is nothing about the options in your contract.

There is nothing necessarily racist or base about this arrangement or social contract.

I got a free consultation from a lawyer about a contract I was being offered by a publisher and he gave me two key pieces of advice: an audit clause means they have nothing to hide and allows you as an author to play IRS and look at their books if you think you're being cheated (an expensive process, but a good publisher wouldn't be afraid of you using it) and believe their BBB rating if they have one.

(However, in all fairness, I signed about 40 media book contracts where I got nothing but an advance to write Star Trek, Spider - Man, Men in Black, and so on.

So many people turn their nose up at indie publishers not realizing that sometimes book contracts have nothing to do with your talent, but about marketing.

ZTE has announced that the Director, its latest smartphone, has come to U.S. Cellular and can be picked up on a 2 - year contract for just about nothing, a price of $ 0.01.

Probably 8 % of respondents say they do not buy beyond the traditional vendors, owing to legal contracts; about 15 % said such purchases were negligible, usually about 5 % of the budget — though 5 % of $ 807,000, this year's average material budget, is nothing to brush aside.

Awful incidents like the LendInk debacle show us there's nothing funny about the jackass - authors who freak out and attack things they don't know they approved in their own contracts.

He's already done a thorough background check into her so he knows that if she were to tell anyone about the contract or anything they might do later, she has nothing he can go after.

There was nothing illegal per se about the contracts the publishers had with Amazon or that the publishers were able to set the retail price under those contracts (Apple was doing business under an agency model for years before they got into ebooks and continues to for its app and music sales).

There is nothing in the contracts stating anything about when / how / what happens and we is taken when a shareholder sells his shares.

If we weren't notified and you placed our horse into a home you know nothing about, and did not allow us to approve said home or get a signed contract with new adopters, then when I find that horse in a sale barn, being neglected, etc., then I will seek legal counsel against the adopter of which we have a signed contract with.

(c) Nothing in the national labor policy indicates that a union and employers in one bargaining unit are free to bargain about wages or working conditions of other bargaining units or to settle these matters for the whole industry, nor does it allow an employer to condition the signing of an agreement on the union's imposition of a similar contract on his competitors.

From a contract law perspective, there is nothing terribly unusual about this case.

It essentially requires that employers only terminate employees for just cause, even if the Employee Handbooks or Employment Contracts say nothing about that requirement.

In his dissent, Justice Binnie worked his way through the three step test and found that there was nothing unconscionable about a sophisticated contractor such as Tercon entering into a contract with the Province which featured a broad exclusion clause prohibiting claims arising from «participation» in the RFP.

Then we had this really nice surprise, which is that there are tons of people who spend tons of time reviewing contracts and it has nothing to do with the M&A or... Another thing we were thinking about when we started out was maybe people pulling data out of their contracts out of leases, but it's like so much broader than that.

for good reason, I think, because if eventually every service or product came with a contract which prevented consumers from filing a lawsuit or class action if, say, for instance, the product or service caused injury or death, like a car with braking system flaws, or a child's toy that causes cancer, etc, then we'd live in a world where corporations could shove whatever they wanted down our throats, cause injuries and death, and we could do nothing about it, because we «agreed to a contract» by using their product or service in the first place (and in this scenario there would be no alternatives, so you either risk using products that could kill you, or you go live in a cave or something).