Sentences with phrase «nothing about its fossil»

I have said nothing about the fossils.

The article concludes that «nothing about this fossil suggest it is anything other than an extinct, lemur - like creature» and that «the remarkable preservation is a hallmark of rapid burial... consistent with a catastrophic flood.»

There have been very few archaeological searches of Borneo, so at the moment we know practically nothing about its fossil record.

Not exact matches

And there are a great deal, the reason you've not heard them is because we have only talked about the fossil record for the most part, and nothing else.

It says nothing about people rushing to stoke the engine with more and more coal, or how much actual coal is added (thus the actual range of speeds to expect), or the possibility of a precipice with bridge out up ahead (runaway GW), how dangerous that might be at various speeds, entailing greater or less number of deaths, or how far or close that precipice is, which we don't know either (except we have some fossil evidence of train wrecks in which 90 % of life died, so we know it could be bad).

Most of the opposition to Keystone XL has nothing to do with our pipeline — it's about groups or individuals who want to end the use of fossil fuels.»

Mr. Dickson wrote passionately about several areas in climate science that troubled him, including: first, the idea that 97 percent of climate scientists agree that climate change is real, caused by humans, and a threat; second, the idea that government agencies had manipulated temperature records to fit a narrative of warming; and third, that China is developing its coal resources so fast that nothing short of radical population control will save us, if burning fossil fuels really does cause global warming.

Just about nothing else would cost so much and do so little, so the bunnies have asked Eli why Roger and the Breakers are doubling down CO2 capture at the source (fossil fuel power plants, cement kilns) imposes a cost on the fossil fuel industry.

To the scientific community, in violation of professional standards, he said nothing about having been paid to produce the «deliverables» by fossil - fuel interests, including the Southern Company (a utility holding company) and the Charles G. Koch Foundation.

Proposed reductions in the consumption of fossil fuels will do nothing about controlling global climate change.

Meanwhile, USA Today also cited Shepherd, who stated that daily or weekly weather patterns «say nothing about longer term climate change,» something one never hears during the summer months when news outlets are falling over themselves to point to «yet another» indication that burning fossil fuels is making the earth a hotter place.

Here is an example of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are wrong - One hundred years isn't enough evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.

«This letter is not balanced, saying absolutely nothing about the unique ability of fossil fuels to provide affordable, reliable energy on a scale of billions,» said Epstein.

LONDON, 30 May, 2017 — In forthright language seldom heard in international climate policy negotiations, a renowned German economist says it is time for the world to accept the truth about the real cost of fossil fuel, and to reject the lie that coal, oil and gas cost society nothing.

People like John O'Sullivan and Kent Clizbe may seem funny to some people, but there is nothing funny about what Attorney General Cuccinelli is doing to UVA and Dr. Mann with the help of his political operatives who are paid by the fossil fuel industry and even by the state of Virginia.

First, there's nothing sustainable about importing exotic nuts from all around the world using fossil - fuel - powered airplanes.

But that isn't to say we know nothing about what CO2 trends will be like in the future — mainly because the inertia in our use of fossil fuels and the carbon cycle itself mean that our ability to strongly affect CO2 concentration pathways before around 2050 is limited.

All the talk of peak oil, that we are running out of fossil fuels and therefore need alternatives — or that we're not and therefore there's nothing to worry about — is a distraction.

As long as you have capitalism you will have political statements opposed to CO2 emissions and promising to do something about it, but political outcomes that achieve nothing and commercial practices that continue exploration for fossil fuels and exploit whatever fossil fuel resources they can get their hands on.

It's got a few custom watch faces that have the logo on them, but there's really nothing about the overall design that screams «Fossil.»