Sentences with phrase «nothing about my styling»

My strands are thick, coarse, and extremely dry, and nothing about my styling routine is easy on my hair type.

Rumor about a special Lamborghini model to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the late Ferruccio Lamborghini (1916 - 1993) surfaced back in July 2015 already, a very select group of VIP customers were invited to Pebble Beach for an exclusive preview of a new hyper car from Sant «Agata... nothing about styling was known at that point and a price of $ 1,500,000 was mentioned, we all hoped the car would be unveiled at the 2015 IAA Show in Frankfurt... but that didn't happen.

Not exact matches

Physics and chemistry tell us nothing about how to utilize language, grammar and literary style.

MUNA's style may sound like it's a throwback to late - «80s radio top - 40, but there's nothing ironic or cynical about their brand of surprisingly soulful dance pop.

- Other ancient documents that state new and contradictory info about NT books, such as quoting parts of I Timothy and stating that the book was manufactured in Paul's style, but had nothing to do with Paul.

There is nothing especially remarkable about either the vocabulary or the style of I Peter.

There is nothing about the combination of sweet and salty that will ever go out of style.

Wilshere himself has been talking about his injury record and although there is good news in that his problems have not been muscular or anything to do with his own physical issues, he admitted that his style of play is partly responsible and what's more there is nothing he can do or is willing to do to change it.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There's nothing really creative or different about his style, he just seems to have gotten a lot stronger and better at dominating positions, and largely wins by strength and following a game plan.

For many a Hollywood mom, nothing says more about your social status and style of parenting than the type of stroller you use.

And while there's nothing to worry about with the many chemical - free lathers on the market (feel free to take a page out of a Mad Men - style playbook and create a mountain of froth when using them), the synthetic ingredients powering most lathering shampoos are cause for concern.

I am about as much of a city girl as you can get - I don't like camping, or bugs, or being outside in places where you can't pop into a store to use a bathroom and get a bottle of water - but I grew up on the high plains of Colorado, and as the daughter of a man who listened to nothing but old fashioned country music, Western style is still pretty close to my heart.

The last time I wore a pair of culottes for «fashion», was probably about 20 years ago (if you can call kiddie culottes fashion), and aside from that the only other time i've worn the style will have been as part of my netball kit for County & club netball... but there was nothing «fashion» about that.

Wearing a skirt in cold season is not easy but if you know how to style it then there is nothing to worry about it.

Nothing was really my style, and the one item I was really excited about doesn't even fit!

There's something distinctively captivating about Cara Delevingne, a supermodel that has risen to stardom but sports nothing but her classic tomboy style when off the runway, including on the red carpet.

I think I'll do more in the future, but I know next to nothing about fashion, and those posts will more along the lines me, showing my personal style.

I was going to tell you about Life Style & Image sooner, but I know that there is nothing worse that visiting a blog and seeing only one or two blog posts.

Something about the high waisted, bum fitting and navel grazing relaxed - fit style it's got that makes it so flattering and comfortable I could live in it for days + almost everything in my wardrobe pairs well with it, it's simply nothing short of amazing.

I'm not trying to be young; It's nothing to do with age, it's about your own personal style and knowing what suits you.

A field I know nothing about and sometimes, I feel insicure as I'm more on personal style than on being fashion forward.

If you've been listening to what guys have to say about clothes that leave nothing to the imagination, you'd know that they mean «contrast styling».

For the man about town, nothing beats grey lace - up semi-formal shoes with hints of oxford - type styling.

Since there's nothing desirable about forsaking the personality from «personal style» and looking like a fashion victim, I didn't want to jump on the stovepipe bandwagon just to entertain a fad that would become as passé as trucker hats.

No matter your personal style or what outfit hang - ups you have in your closet currently, there is something kind of magical about creating a new outfit out of nothing.

Just don't get drunk Snooki - style because there's nothing appealing about being a hot mess.

Its ok nothing superb with the design and also some old - poor style but here in pof its all about the result, the frontpage seems like a forum page but they have already focused on to results — matches.

There's nothing special or new about it, just another family guy - style cartoon that never made it bigtime.

Crimmins, also a comedian in the 1980s, held nothing back onstage; whether ranting about abolishing the Catholic Church or eviscerating the political figures of the time, his style was always scathing, clever and sardonic.

There is nothing warm about the style, yet it allows for moments of simmering tension, broken by a few emotional explosions that shatter its well - composed surface.

Nothing about the approach or the writing is original and the sluggish pace isn't augmented by any of Mann's visual style.

There's nothing too special about it but fans of Mastermind - style code - breaking will definitely dig it.

So here we go again, another classic Asian film falling victim to the Hollywood remake system, where style and tone is generally lost in translation like the many that came before it, Dark Water, The Ring, The Grudge and The Eye, but with Oscar nominated director Spike Lee at the helm, surely we have nothing to worry about?

OK, the not so good stuff: I am beginning to despise 3 - D (it adds nothing, while diminishing the brightness of colors); Jotunheim (land of the Frost Giants) is plain, gray and boring; Natalie Portman, fresh off an Oscar is just terrible as an astro - physicist with a teenager - style crush on Thor; Tom Hiddleston as Loki is one of the weakest villains I have ever seen in a super - hero / comic book movie; Rene Russo must not have read the script prior to accepting her role — she has about 3 lines and is totally wasted.

There's just nothing particularly mind - blowing about this trailer until the very end when the humor, the style, and the premise come together to create something uniquely entertaining.

There's nothing fresh about his style or approach anymore; it's tired and outdated.

But whether she's working closely with her editors or she's leaving them little choice in how to cut her films because of how lean her scripts and footage are, this kind of short, snappy, collage - like approach to storytelling has become Gerwig's «style» — which undercuts the argument that there's nothing distinctive about the way her movies look and feel.

Yet in the end it contributes nothing in story or style that seems to add to the currently fashionable dialogue about rehabilitation and recidivism.

Minecraft: The Story of Mojang is charming fluff, a sweet tribute to a popular game, and its piecemeal «best of» style makes for a pleasant enough affirmation for fans who want nothing more than a brief glimpse behind the scenes, but for a documentary about a game in which players are compelled to dig ever deeper in search of raw material, it's disappointingly ironic how many blocks of narrative ore the film fails to unearth.

It's pretty good, too, but although the Canadian director's style is as distinctive as ever, there's nothing particularly original about what the film has to say.

Nothing feels authentic (the less said about the accents the better), and Cooper doesn't pony up nearly enough style to make up for the lack of substance.

Indeed, Eisenberg's customary clipped phrasing and precision - tooled performance style makes him perfect for a film about the fact that nothing and no - one can attain true perfection.

From his era - appropriate soundtrack (featuring Thomas Dolby, Greg Kihn and The Fixx) to the visual style of his opening credits and his slyly reverential camerawork, West gives his movie the look and feel of a 25 - year - old relic, yet nothing about Devil seems stale.

The lesson follows a step - by - step learning journey, in which students learn through: - Defining and exemplifying the key features of Shakespearean context; - Reading and comprehending key extracts from Much Ado About Nothing, relating them to the features of Shakespearean context; - Completing an essay style response in which they consider how the key features of social and historical context influence the events of the play.

Daniel's teacher is enthusiastic and creative in her teaching, but she knows nothing about how to adapt a curriculum to the learning style of a child with disabilities.

There's nothing particularly high - style about the CR - V — on the outside, it's anything but sexy, with a bizarre front end, a minivan profile, and small (in this company) seventeen - inch wheels with tall sidewalls.

After years of more boxy and business - like designs, Volvo's future style is according to Cumberford, «elegantly beautiful, even if there's nothing innovative about it.»

There's nothing subtle about the styling of Mitsubishi's all - new Eclipse sport coupe.

There's nothing revolutionary about the clean, uncluttered concept, which shares some styling cues with the far more radical Viziv concept shown at Geneva.