But even if you know
nothing about the technology outside of its rising ubiquity in major newspapers and magazines, know that the reason it has so captured the fancy of technologists and policy makers is because our economy is now more digital than ever and more distributed.
... Following my recent blog posts on «Legal Conferences and Artificial Intelligence «and «Hack the Past: How the Legal Profession
knew nothing about Technology «I saw this tweet from Janders Dean and thought it very apt!
«At first, I knew
nothing about technology.
Almost any other executive in those circumstances would not have agreed to let Susan come in for an interview: She was a creative artist who knew
nothing about technology.
I knew that everybody would have one of those, and from that, knowing
nothing about the technology and all the things they would have to overcome to get there, I just took it for granted that everybody's machine would be connected with everybody else's and that they'd be typing to one another, or whatever it was they did.
In an interview with Charlie Rose he explained how he was trained as an English high school teacher and knows
nothing about technology.
I'm reminded of any number of meetings I've been in where some dickhead vice-president who knows
nothing about technology will, for political or budgetary reasons, give his or her creative, oversimplified misundertanding that sounds reasonable enough to other dickheaded VPs and managers, yet is outright wrong.
You can not assess the benefits and risks associated with various kinds of technology if you know
nothing about the technology.
I revealed in my recent post on «Hack the Past: How the Legal Profession knew
nothing about Technology «that I taught myself some basic coding on a BBC Micro computer way back in the early 1980s.
Maybe you know
nothing about technology; that's OK too.
First,
nothing about the technology has changed.
You are such a dumb and knows
nothing about technology.
You know
nothing about technology.