Sentences with phrase «nothing about the individual»

You know nothing about the individuals on this board, or their decision - making process.

That says little to nothing about individuals within any denomination, church, or organization.

Because the law says nothing about individual holders, he says, his claim — which he sent to the United Nations — has some clout.

Third, the average gain in muscle tells you nothing about the individual results for each subject, which can often vary widely.

In that case, a high score on test 1 would predict a high score on test 2, but would tell us nothing about the individual's performance on the math tests, 3 and 4.

But that means nothing about the individual flows.

But that says nothing about the individual flows.

Not exact matches

Above all, Facebook's reversion to reliance on individual users to drive content does nothing to address longstanding concerns about echo chambers and «filter bubbles» on the site.

Net worth says nothing about the income and expenses of an individual, and how those might change over time.

It is designed to do nothing more than to provide a broad sketch of the outline of how professional investors might think about the market and selecting individual stocks within it.

But the positions of these interest groups and powerful individuals says nothing about the popularity of this measure with what should be the most important constituency — the American people.

So in other words, there is nothing inherently «bad» about in - laws, but rather the bad comes from the corruption of sin into either how the triangle is managed or the individual relationships.

The things I find most appalling about religion reach a new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down of individual thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the views of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation of women to the point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a general back - sliding against the rest of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.

We strongly suggest doing a background check on individuals about whom we know nothing before inviting them to share our homes.

There is nothing happy about a culture that teaches us to value our own, individual success over human life.

We get a hint concerning what this is when we note that Jesus apparently said nothing about «the indefeasible value of the individual,» but He did say that not a sparrow «shall fall without your Father,» (Matthew, 10:2) and «take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones...» (Matthew 18:1.)

You're rant is rather incomprehensible, you're all over the map, but if you really believe that corporations, or any business would have an individual at the «C» level who was promoting anything out of hate, you are completely ignorant, don't know a thing about the corporate world, and absolutely nothing about law, free markets, or economics.

There was nothing hazy about worship in the ancient Near East: the individual was constantly surrounded by cult and ritual.

Maddox's uneasiness about the process limitation of God's action to luring creatures and Lodahi's concern that the process rejection of creation from nothing limits God's ability to save all reality offer additional statements of the concern in Searching that God does not relate personality to individuals.

It's Continental liberalism that's all about nothing standing between the isolated individual and the state.

Many appear to be much concerned about it, but nothing is more evident, both in reason, and in the holy Scripture, than that religion is ever a matter between God and individuals; and therefore no man or men can impose any religious test without invading the essential prerogatives of our Lord Jesus Christ....

Ogden does make a case for various other individuals and some may still take issue with a few of his selections, but ultimately his point about the lack of stand - out English talent is very true and although it's nothing new, it should still very much be a concern for England moving forward.

That's not to say I don't get excited about sports and there are of course individual games that give me nothing but warm fuzzy feelings, because I'm not a completely heartless sports fan.

Tactically Wenger is not on par with the current leading managers in world football fact, but if we are discussing the team mentality then isn't it true that players tend to reflect the attitude of the managers, if we look at the leading managers how many of them sit down holding themselves instead of getting up to spur there team on, how many of them are critical about individual player performances as well as team performances, Wenger either cheers them on or does nothing, he may say that he still has passion and desire for the club and that maybe true, but rarely does that passion and desire become apparent, particularly on the pitch.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Our British crew that always speak after a decent result / decent individual performance — Ramsey, Theo, etc. — always talk about how a result (usually a draw, a W that we fight back to achieve after a slow start) gives us confidence and the belief that we can kick on and challenge at the top, but nothing ever comes from those words.

During the critical early months and years, when babies should be learning about the world and making millions of neuronal connections, babies exposed to AP are deprived of contact with the outside world (many are constantly carried in a position where they can see nothing but the surface of the mother's clothing) and their exposure to other individuals such as fathers, grandparents and childcare workers is severely limited.

Sometimes companies listen to our concerns and sometimes they don't, but even a «loss» is a win when individuals like 100 Days of Real Food and the Food Babe can get the national media to shine a spotlight on important food issues many consumers know nothing about.

If you look at this group, there is nothing like CPC any more, there is nothing like ACN any more and there is nothing like ANPP any more Even those who came into the party about the same time or after the merger came in as individuals.

There is nothing sexy about this individual in any capacity, are these people smoking the herb?

«There's nothing very tricky about this: Thousands of New Yorkers busted their backsides to create a ballot line in 2014, and a few individuals are now trying to steal it — it's a tale as old as prostitution,» Astorino spokesman William O'Reilly said.

Critics worry that so narrowly tailoring news to an individual's interests could ultimately create an ideological hall of mirrors, with right - wingers reading only about the latest abuses by the teachers union and the ACLU, the left - wingers seeing nothing but stories about corporate greed and John Ashcroft.

SN: Let's say you have an individual who knows absolutely nothing about how to properly train and eat for 6 - pack abs.

There is nothing nonchalant about these deeply individual, symbolic pieces.

There is nothing to be shy about as essentially all types of individuals from all strata of community now practice it.

Given the complexity associated with interracial dating wherein you know absolutely nothing about the other individual, it become critical to share a few bits about your personal life.

They also hire and pay certain individuals who have never used their site nor know nothing about it, to write best dating sites review for them.

Frustratingly, the script makes no effort to differentiate these game young men as individuals; we know nothing about their backgrounds, what their interests are and why, individually, each one decided that Greek life was important enough to subject himself to the ordeal he's embarking upon.

Max is a disturbed individual, and nothing about his antics is endearing or amusing.

If they were not together, they would have nothing to talk about as individuals.

Myelin only cares about how the individual practiced, how many times and for how long the individual practiced; nothing else matters!

It tells Learning and Development and the wider organization little or nothing about how effective a learning intervention has been, how it has added value, or what impact the training has had on individual and business performance.

«Individual schools can and should take steps to address workload but they can do nothing about the timing or the content of government reforms or the weight of accountability.

It is time for the individual members of the ConnCAN Advisory Board to explain why they said nothing as ConnCAN spent half a million dollars lying about Connecticut, our schools, our teachers and our system of public education.

Few people care more about individual students than public - school teachers do, but what's really missing in this dystopian narrative is a hearty helping of reality: 21st - century public schools, with their record numbers of graduates and expanded missions, are nothing close to the cesspools portrayed by political hyperbole.

Bill's point about Target had nothing to do with the number of individual books they sell.

Of course when I emailed Amazon directly, they said they were sorry, there was nothing wrong with the system that they were aware of and they could only speak with individual customers about their particular review.

Are these individuals who post this sort of thing under «reviews» on Goodreads correct in saying the author is a «badly behaving author» because they stated that this was inappropriate and reported it to Goodreads staff, who did nothing about it?

Like any other rapidly growing business, many of these sites are organized and administered by individuals who know nothing about academic writing and / or who exist to make a «quick buck» at the customer's expense.

Net worth says nothing about the income and expenses of an individual, and how those might change over time.