Sentences with phrase «nothing about the mechanism»

His point was not to deny (or affirm) whether nature comes from a creator but only that such a statement explains nothing about the mechanism by which species are transformed over time.

«We have found that special molecules called ultra-conserved RNA were not produced in human tumors and this contributed to their growth, but we knew nothing about this mechanism.

«We knew synaptic transmission was vital and probabilistic but we knew nothing about the mechanisms.

The correlation observed by Salby tells absolutely nothing about the mechanisms behind the long term trend.

Not exact matches

Even so, in deploying the «envisage» or «entertain,» nothing definite is said about the non-conjunctive mechanism involved in the primordial act of holding - together - without - bringing - into - overarching - unity.

Similarly, when Intelligent Design asserts that God planted many new phyla on the earth during the Cambrian period, «nothing is thus added to our knowledge» about the mechanism whereby such momentous changes occurred.

The detailed sequence of elementary steps (about twenty) which must be involved in the B - Z reaction has been worked out by Richard Noyes.11 This mechanism (called «the Oregonator» in honor of the location of Noyes's laboratory) is well understood and involves nothing but ordinary chemistry, but it is too involved to discuss here.

Whatever its material causes (about which Heidegger really had nothing to say), the founding ideology of the modern vision of reality was, he believed, easily defined: the triumph of subjectivity in philosophy and of mechanism in science; egoism and technology.

«Almost nothing is known» about the molecular and cellular mechanism by which water is detected in the mouth and throat, and the neural pathway by which that signal is transmitted to the brain, says Zachary Knight, a neuroscientist at the University of California, San Francisco.

But there is nothing slack about the storytelling mechanism, which invisibly kicks into gear within the first 30 seconds.

I clearly have a bias (in that I believe based on the evidence I've seen that AGW is both real and dangerous enough to warrant strong action), but when I see a reference to a climate mechanism I know nothing about (the PDO in this instance), I tend to want to look at the available literature before leaping to conclusions based on my bias.

The abstract you reference mentions nothing about under sea volcanos, can you state the total amount of Co2 released into the oceans via this mechanism (+ / - 1 Gigaton)?

So all of your claims of deep insights into where the joules are, and all of you talking about some mechanism or other that you are absolutely sure will make the air temperature at the top and bottom different, that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PROOF.

«[T] he science to me — and I have been involved, not as a scientist but as a lawyer — the science to me suggests, in the ten years I've been involved in it, that there is no basis, no mechanism that anybody can point to or look at to say that more CO2 in the air is going to lead to catastrophic global warming or apocalyptic global warming, as opposed to some mild warming, which is nothing to be concerned about at all.

The hotspot has to do with the moist adiabatic lapse rate; it says nothing to do about the mechanism causing the warming.

Shared ownership Although it sounds like a shiny brand new label, there is nothing new about the mechanism through which shared ownership is created.

Within these repositories appear to be nothing less than mechanisms capable of organizing vast quantities of data about individuals, measuring how they are being influenced or reached by advertising, and even tracking their internet browsing behavior.