Not exact matches
The irony being that he was threatened by the church for going
against the whole «god did it»
argument, which is what this guy was trying to claim, and has
nothing to do with «real science»
There is
nothing in your continuous emotional diatribes
against me that offer anything of a reasoned
argument.
But unless you have an alternative that meets the same criteria as your passionate
argument against religion I can not understand the logic in believing in
nothing.
What you are doing is indeed an
argument against Christianity, but the
argument is literally
nothing but a series of straw men.
Here you can make your
arguments for or
against, pro or anti and it makes no difference to me, that is MY personal stance,
nothing more.
In several recent works, William Lane Craig argues that there is
nothing to commend Hartshorne's view, that there are positive
arguments against it, and that absurd consequences follow from it (PT 103; PS 16:201;...
But the
argument against the iconoclasts is utterly fallacious: it is denied that one can have an idolatrous attitude toward an icon, since an idol is the expression of something that does not exist — a fiction, a semblance, a
nothing.
@neitdarwin — not sure is that an
argument for or
against, pretty sure Hitler had
nothing to do with Christianity, but lip service to look like a «good moral character» plenty of people claim Christianity to look like a good person
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have
argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is
nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.
Many philosophers have accepted the assumption on which this objection rests — that there might have been
nothing or that the existence of a world is cause for amazement — but it is Houston Craighead who has, in effect, aimed this line of
argument against Hartshorne in a critique of the ontological
argument (PS 1:9 - 24; RTE 33 - 37).
some of your posts have been straw men
arguments against total depravity that are real easy for you knock down and in reality the text has
nothing to do with inability and no Calvinist believes it either
However, know that sniffing out only the stories of greed and abuse in the church while ignoring all the stories of actual progress for society that it brings pretty much negates all of your
arguments to that of an obsessed critic with
nothing better to do than make up facts
against the church.
«This has
nothing to do with religion but with the fact that Romney is only recently pro-life and only recently able to articulate an
argument against same - sex marriage,» said Richard Land, the public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest evangelical denomination.
Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if
nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main
argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team
Davies»
argument that men suffer violence too, and until parliament does something about violence
against men it should absolutely do
nothing about violence
against women, is not new, and not interesting.
But if you're, you know just for
argument -LSB-'s] sake, if you are 20 feet from the ship, but you're in the same, going exactly the same velocity as the ship, ordinarily well, you would be up the creek, so to speak; because with
nothing to accelerate
against you would just parallel the path of the ship until you run out of oxygen or starve to death, whatever.
I testified at the state legislature in Louisiana
against one of the no -
nothing bills you mentioned, and even though it was painfully obvious that the legislators had no real intention of being affected by any
argument we might make, it was a necessary «waste» of time.
Peter, as I've told you before, the blog post you linked, and the paper it references, are
nothing but straw - man
arguments against solar power.
I agree that
arguments against pollution controls often hinge on the scientific uncertainties, of which there are always many, instead of the body of evidence and the price of doing
nothing.
Fourth some
arguments against climate change policies on the basis of scientific uncertainty often rest on the ethically dubious notion that
nothing should be done to reduce a threat that some are imposing on others until all uncertainties are resolved.
... that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts
against peace and good order; that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has
nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free
argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.
The MICRA unconstitutionality
argument was long ago decided
against attorney, with the appellate court determining
nothing had changed to dissuade it from giving stare decisis impact to Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc., 37 Cal.3 d 920, 923 (1985).
So although there is
nothing illegal about it, and it may not be dangerous, if you get in an accident barefoot, there could be a legal
argument you will face
against you in the future.