Nothing against gay folks but just using that as an example
«He has said
nothing against gay men and women in this state and, quite the contrary, has expressed an openness to dialogue with gay Republicans.
I have
nothing against gay folk.
I have
nothing against gay people, I just don't agree with their live style (just like I don't agree with alcoholism, adultery, etc).
I have
nothing against gays, I do nt want gay marriage but I will not let lying rationalizations go on to justify the false positions that the gay agenda has said.
as an atheist, and straight person who has
nothing against gays, I believe in family values and the value of human life.
Nothing against gays, just a comment on how hypocritical people are.
Not exact matches
Because the indulgence of its aestheticism is in fact
against the law, NAMBLA leads a shadowy existence and its membership tends to be secretive, although every once in a while it breaks into public view, causing consternation in the «mainline»
gay movement that is bent upon assuring Americans that it wants
nothing but tolerance while it is conducting a revolution that will change everything and everyone.
They insult Black folks and
nothing happens, they insult Jewish fellows and
nothing happens, they spew hatred
against gays, and
nothing happens.
Christians standing
against the LGBT movement has
nothing to do with not loving
gay people.
Jesus said
nothing against slavery, or
gays, but he did disapprove of divorce.
And while I'm on the topic, Christ said
nothing against being
Gay.
«The president of Chick only said he was
against gay marriage
nothing else and this is what happens.
hingie, I really don't care what you think since my civil marriage has
nothing to do with your book of fairy tales and if the main reason you believe
gays should be discriminated
against is because you read it in your book of myths, then all the more reason to grant
gays their civil marriages.
I am a
gay man and I have
nothing against these companies.
I don't have polls to back this up, but a simplified version of what I just said would be: A libertarian is likely to vote FOR «pro-
gay-marriage» specifically - e.g. in a referendum - but vote
against politicians («D») who are for
gay marriage for reasons that have
nothing to do with
gay marriage but with the politicians» other policies.