We controlled from the beginning, but created nearly
nothing as your graph shows.
Not exact matches
There are many aspects of SEO that have
nothing to do with content marketing, such
as site architecture, semantic markup, Knowledge
Graph integration, etc..
jgnfld said to Sheldon the Denier: «
As has been pointed out to you scores of times by people with knowledge of stats your
graphs «prove» exactly
nothing.
The NINO3.4 SST anomalies you see in the
graphs (
as explained in those posts) are there
as references for timing,
nothing more.
it doesn't need to involve my SAW or AHH's AGW) that doesn't admit an obvious decomposition resembling Figure 10 of my poster, and instead has a component more like D'Aleo and Easterbrook's
graph at WUWT that was mentioned here earlier, this ought to be excellent grist for their mill,
as well
as hopefully satisfying those objecting that SAW has
nothing whatsoever to do with ocean oscillations.
And
as the
graph used by the Independent to bolster its case (supplied by CRU, apparently) demonstrates, the Nature study does absolutely
nothing to address that concern:
Thus water doesn't play any role in the 3 - 4 micron band and all energy absorbed there (
as can be seen in the «total absorption and scattering»
graph) is from CO2 alone and
nothing else, whatever the water content of the atmosphere.
So the
graph that has «absolutely
nothing to do with Dr Mann» is listed on Dr Mann's own CV
as one of his published works.
This is not a
graph steady dilution
as claimed,
as straight line,
nothing like it.
As for the data, models contain wonderful differential equations that manipulate the data in wonderful ways; however, all of that data manipulation is
nothing more than a sophisticated method of extrapolating the future from existing
graphs.
We have a worldwide CO2 global warming crisis and American politicians are running around trying to throw money at coal - to - liquid production that
as the
graph shows, does
nothing to reduce carbon emissions IF they can
We have a worldwide CO2 global warming crisis and American politicians are running around trying to throw money at coal - to - liquid production that
as the
graph shows, does
nothing to reduce carbon emissions IF they can figure out how to sequester the CO2 and over DOUBLES if there is no sequestration.
He makes a bold claim - temperature projections are fundamentally flawed, and
as «proof» gives us a
graph which shows
nothing of the sort.
All this concern trolling about «hiding the decline»
as the denialists phrase it, yet
NOTHING on TGGWS when they posted a
graph that seemed to show solar changes and temperature changes were concordant in the records beyond 2000, when the data shown never went that far.
In science, weight of numbers
as in «we have more
graphs showing this» counts for
nothing.