The Christian philosopher can not as a philosopher speak of the unique act of God in Jesus Christ, just as he can say
nothing of particular events in any area, but he can and should so structure his ideas as to allow for such unique acts and particular events.
It so definitely cuts across the usual pattern
of our thought that we find it hard to recognize that there is
nothing inherently improbable, not to say impossible, in God's choosing to make himself known in a
particular series
of events.
According to Roger Ames (NAT 117), an «aesthetic order» is a paradigm that: (1) proposes plurality as prior to unity and disjunction to conjunction, so that all particulars possess real and unique individuality; (2) focuses on the unique perspective
of concrete particulars as the source
of emergent harmony and unity in all interrelationships; (3) entails movement away from any universal characteristic to concrete
particular detail; (4) apprehends movement and change in the natural order as a processive act
of «disclosure» — and hence describable in qualitative language; (5) perceives that
nothing is predetermined by preassigned principles, so that creativity is apprehended in the natural order, in contrast to being determined by God or chance; and (6) understands «rightness» to mean the degree to which a thing or
event expresses, in its emergence toward novelty as this exists in tension with the unity
of nature, an aesthetically pleasing order.
That hope is probably grounded in some truth because recent
events tell us that AGU is capable
of dumping shame on
particular members with great alacrity, though the most recent example actually had
nothing to do with science per se.