Sentences with phrase «nothing speaks more»

2) No matter how well you are qualified, or how experienced you are, nothing speaks more than a good cover letter.

«Nothing speaks more clearly to the quality of our people and our products than the amazing growth we have experienced over the last few years.

Nothing speaks more loudly to me than when I see «Supported by the Henry Moore Foundation» at an exhibition.

Well, nothing speaks more of emotional endings than FFX, but that is all up to the developers; whether they want tears due to death or other emotions is still to be seen.

Nothing speaks more Americana to me than a classic white button down, pair of blue jeans and killer red heels.

Nothing speaks more to that than when Margot briefly imagines sharing her bad - sex fling with Robert with a sympathetic boyfriend at some point in life — only to realize that she'll probably never find a man she'll feel comfortable being herself around and sharing her past with without facing his judgment: «but of course there was no such future, because no such boy existed, and never would.»

Nothing speaks more about fan discontent than falling attendances and yet they are as high as ever.

Not exact matches

Nothing speaks to this more than the fact that Tesla has the highest customer satisfaction levels and the highest percentage of customers who say that their next car will be a Tesla in the entire global auto industry.

And while sex harassment is nothing new, more victims are speaking up — and employers are listening.

There is nothing that can come out of this to keep more people from dying, and it is a lot of responsibility, but ultimately we are only speaking out now for those who can not and for those who are not ready yet.

Twenty years ago, men and women had similar attitudes towards children - young women, on average, wanted slightly more children than young men, but the differences were nothing to speak of.

Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;

tf: There is nothing «on atheism», atheism (once again) points to a singular thing - the disbelief in god... It speaks to nothing more.

Speaking in abstract terms about blank, amorphous «innocent lives» keeps us from confronting the reality that if most of these children are born at or near the poverty line, then the lives we are saving are more likely to be troubled ones, and if nothing changes, those lives will get caught in vicious cycles powered by poverty and systemic racism.

I certainly appreciate your confidence in me, but here's the thing: There's a double - standard out there in which a woman's critique of patriarchy tends to get discounted as nothing more than the rants of an «angry feminist,» and, truth be told, I've grown a bit weary of hearing that charge each time I speak out about this disturbing trend in the evangelical church.

Edwin Muir, a poet from the Orkney Islands spoke of the tragedy of there being nothing more than words in the Calvinist form of Christianity with which he was familiar:

Nothing makes a man more human than to strap him with the ol' ball - n - chain (so to speak).

The «democratic» Christianity you speak of is nothing more than the product of your modern understanding of history.

You «christians» are nothing more than hypocritical sunday christians who go to church, put on a face for a few hours per week, then come home and BEAT YOUR CHILDREN because you say the bible says to use the «Rod»... Do I speak from experience?

Jesus was nothing more than the sacrifices the Jews did with their unblemished sheep when they wished to speak with God.

The Eastern Church believes in sanctification after death, and perhaps the doctrine of purgatory really asserts nothing more; but can Rome ever say that in speaking of it as «temporal punishment,» which the pope may in whole or part remit, it was in error?

Why don't you simply admit that you have absolutely NO evidence of any gods, you have no idea if your religion is true, and that all religions are nothing more than what MEN made up as if to speak for «god» when they have no idea if there are any gods to begin with.

The capacity to speak, symbolized by the physical tongue, is the primary way through which we human beings express ourselves, and nothing reveals more deeply the biblical insight into the sinfulness and brokenness of human life than our verbal means of self - expression.

Humanly speaking his destruction is the most certain of all things — and the despair in his soul fights desperately to get leave to despair, to get, if you will, repose for despair, the consent of his whole personality to despair, so that he would curse nothing and nobody more fiercely than him who attempted (Or it may be the attempt) to prevent him from despairing, as the poet's poet so capitally, so incomparably expresses it in Richard II, Act 3, Scene Z:

It certainly is good to have finally found out that Christianity is nothing more than just tradition, ritual and culture and that all the things which the Bible says about God and prayer are not true — God does not speak to or lead or guide or direct anyone or put thoughts in anyone's mind or show them signs or speak to their heart or mind or tells them what to do or calls people or chooses people or has a plan for people's lives whether they are in an altered state of consciousness / transcendent state or whether they are in an unaltered cognitive state.

On a personal level there is nothing I would love more than for the chance to dance for the Holy Father and to go speak to him about this, and if God wants it'll happen.»

Speaking in riddles, in a feeble attempt to look intelligent, does nothing more than put your stupidity on public display.

Atheism only speaks to disbelief, nothing more.

Speaking as someone who does not, in fact, think one can know with absolute certainty that other people exist at all, and therefore «strongly believes» that indeed other «minds» exist, calling the blief that other minds exist nothing more than «blind faith» seems a little out there.

I came across your blog a couple of weeks ago and a lot of what you write and draw speaks very deeply to me but nothing more so than this.

It speaks of this person in mythological terms, but does this mean that we can reject the kerygma altogether on the ground that it is nothing more than mythology?

It is gratifying that, since I wrote «Scandal Time III,» many more priests and lay people are speaking up in defense of priests who are falsely accused, denied due process, or guilty, repentant, and forgiven in connection with offenses that have nothing — absolutely nothing — to do with the imperative purpose of protecting children from sexual abuse.

You speak from the point of nothing more than, colloquially put, «book - knowledge» that has never been proven in your real life.

Therefore, to engage in correlational analysis of presuppositions is nothing more, but also nothing less, than to make explicit the understanding of the character of the ontic correlate presupposed in speaking of experience in the first place.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

If a preacher does not possess the spiritual consciousness to speak out against these paralyzing societal forces, they are nothing more than a self help speaker with fans who shell out big dollars for books and CDs.

The arrogance to think you know more «truth» when it is nothing but subjective fantasy speaks volumes about the silliness of religion.

It really was nothing more than a servant that is the kind of slave the bible speaks of, but when it goes past that and the owner starts to treat the servant wrong and control and beat on him..

So to the Exchange, and thence home to dinner with my brother, and in the afternoon to Westminster hall, and there found Mrs. Lane, and by agreement we met at the Parliament stairs (in my way down to the boat who should meet us but my lady Jemimah, who saw me lead her but said nothing to me of her, though I ought to speak to her to see whether she would take notice of it or no) and off to Stangate and so to the King's Head at Lambeth marsh, and had variety of meats and drinks, but I did so towse her and handled her, but could get nothing more from her though I was very near it; but as wanton and bucksome as she is she dares not adventure upon the business, in which I very much commend and like her.

I am saying nothing of which many liberationists have not spoke more eloquently.

And all their whining and fighting is nothing more than further evidence that we are still kings and unless we do our job everyone and everything is getting screwed except Johnny (metaphorically speaking of course).»

I am continually amazed by the amount of people I speak to who believe organics is nothing more than a passing fad — akin to MC Hammer pants, mullet hairstyles or Cabbage Patch Kids — championed by people on the fringe of society.

Since Irving is under contract for two more seasons, technically speaking there's nothing forcing the Cavaliers from keeping Kyrie.

For my money and this is only personally speaking I feel that Walcott should get far more stick than Giroud Walcott has been «developing» for nearly ten years and especially this season just gone has done next to nothing, even when given a place in the starting line up.

Dude, speaking of transfers is nothing more than filling the time until the window opens or endulging in speculations.

We would learn more from de breu speaking Spanish than Wenger butchering the English language in his vague references to nothing

Players previously spoke about how Arsene Wenger's approach would convince them to sign for the Arsenal, but now it seems that he can do nothing more than make them look the other way.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Whether it's Gazidis making ridiculous claims about our supposedly successful transfer window, even going so far as to suggest that everything went according to plann, or it's Wenger having the audacity to speak about taking a much more proactive approach to the re-signing of players with less than 2 years left on their current deals; which on it's own is a nothing story, it's football management 101, but let's not forget just a few weeks ago he was proudly championing his «ingenious» plan of having his best players playing in the last year of their respective contracts.

It is almost impossible to put in a tackle when the ball is passed quickly around the field with minimal touches.In - fact Barca would want nothing more than Stoke's defense to come out of its shell, so to speak, just so that they can find space behind them.