Sentences with phrase «nothing to back»

Marketing gets you noticed but if you have nothing to back it up they will pick skill and experience over unique every time.

This is a real world example of a refute against my article which I truly appreciate, unlike the majority of comments who are flaming me with nothing to back it up.

However, if you use them without any supporting documentation, the resume will be viewed as just another puffed up, aggrandized series of statements with nothing to back them up.

Our anecdotal sense from being involved in so many cases (nothing to back this up with other than our now finely - honed radar) is that it is about 50 - 50.

As regards undue influence, the judge held that there was nothing to back up C's allegation that D had repeatedly «pestered or badgered» her mother into making a new will.

You have nothing to back up your claims with.

That's rich coming from a guy who phoned in his Steyn review with nothing to back him up but an ugly misogynist sock puppet.

Evidence: Nothing to back up the «which are considerable» remark.

55 Web Hub Telescope: Note how M.Marler makes a pure assertion with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Having said all that, I think certain types of climate denialists should be banned from websites, if they are just spamming, or making outrageous claims with just pure lists of propaganda slogans, with nothing to back up their claims.

Much of this generation has felt like broken promises... a lot of hype but with nothing to back it up.

As such, it's impossible to take your conjecture seriously, because you say definitively that it will be the case, despite 4 decades of evidence pointing to something counter, and you do absolutely nothing to back it up with anything beyond hyperbole.

A true sign that you have nothing to back up your argument with besides your own opinion, so you take it down a level to get your view across.

Here is the thing — you just come on here challenging people with nothing to back it up?

If you just go out there trying to entice people to «buy my book», with nothing to back you, no reviews etc., it will be even tougher to chew than you expect.

For example, the researchers — whose study was confined to California — found nothing to back one popular explanation: that increased public awareness...

The story starts with little David Spade spinning his tires, listening to Skynyrd, and talking trash with nothing to back it up.

This is a punishingly loud film, one filled with screaming matches and chaos and nothing to back it up.

Everything is rushed, yet each scene drags on interminably, convinced that its absurd monsters are scary and that an overbearing score can induce suspense with nothing to back it up.

But being quite rude about it and nothing to back her up, so...

Miner said Long has nothing to back up her claims about increasing crime in the neighborhood since the mosque opened.

Grimm, a convicted felon, deemed injection sites «criminal enablement» and «dangerous» in a lengthy statement that cited nothing to back up his claim.

You keep insisting that women are dissatisfied with hospitals and are seeking out home because of medical negligence committed by residents in the hospitals, but you have nothing to back it up except anecdotes that you refuse to tell us.

When they start making claims about so - called «unnecessary interventions» and the rhetoric that goes along with that with nothing to back up their statements, it really is frustrating.

See what i'm getting at here, there is a difference between being realistic and being blatantly negative with nothing to back up what you are even being negative about.

I've got nothing to back this up — but PC just gives me the impression that ALL he wants is to play every week and stay in London for the best team that will have him.

Of course Wenger has the final say, there is nothing to back up that idiotic claim but hey... Everyone knows it so it must be true right?

You made a statement with nothing to back it up.

Ozil has always says he wants to evolve his game yet on the pitch i have seen nothing to back up his claim.

First, it exposes the fact that most whey companies really have nothing to back up their claims of superiority.

It's still a theory with nothing to back it up.

There is nothing to back that a god said anything but plenty to back that man wrote those words.

SO you are wrong and have nothing to back your hand waving up.

If any of the crap from the bible were true, it could be taught in schools but it can't be due to the fact that there is nothing to back it.

You say these words, but then provide nothing to back yourself up.

There is nothing to back up your a $ $ ertions.

Jibberish i.e. wild statements with nothing to back»em up is for juveniles and the less able.

You make a lot of claims, but nothing to back it up.

Very well said Tim — You forgot to mention to have the unbelievers explain fish skeletons scientists have found over the years in the clefts of mountain top ranges, shark teeth discovered all in the Arizona deserts — Of course we know it was the flood — To a lot of non believers I speak to; it's sad because as opposed to looking / researching God's many evidences that He has left there are so many willfully ignorant in listening to modern man's (& I might add) opinion with nothing to back up evolution theories.

but the EMperor had nothing to back it up..

Archeology has only been able to confirm historical events back to the phrase «The House of David» which means that there's nothing to back up claims about Adam, the Flood, Abraham, Moses, the Exodus, or the invasion of Canaan.

it offers a lazy mans explaination since there is absolutely nothing to back up the «god» hypothesis

The major difference between scientific theory and faith is scientific theories are usually backed up by verifialble data, observation and facts while faith has apparently nothing to back it.

You mean those stories that have nothing to back them up from a historical or archeological standpoint?

You have already concluded a «designer» when there is NOTHING to back up the hypothesis.

same old religious rhetoric with NOTHING to back it up.

I tried to do some quick google research on your outrageous allegations, but could find nothing to back up your claims.

You said nothing but belief, and there continues to be absolutley nothing to back up your hypothesis.

Potentially due to the fact that you have nothing to back you and yet feel the need to push it in the public square without one iota of respect or care about how other people believe.

Intelligent design may sound that it is factual, but has nothing to back it up.