Sentences with phrase «nothing to see»
Looking out of our double front doors into the front yard: Nothing to see from the front doors but the woods.
http://organizecleandecorate.com/
No car crash, nothing to see, move along...
I sat there secretly hating his guts and contemplating divorce while making polite small talk with our friend and pretending that everything was fine, nothing to see here, move along...
>> Beyonce and sister Solange Knowles continued their social media «move along, nothing to see here» charm offensive with a pic of themselves hugging in New Orleans.
Nothing to see.
The photo of your porch looks like the «nothing to see» progress is actually pretty big, so congrats on that.
If you don't, there's nothing to see.»
So nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here, except for sustained high demand for the best Android phone you can buy.
Nothing has changed, there is nothing to see.
It went from, «No, this is not a problem, no problems here, nothing to see here,» to, «I need to fix something.»
As the G uses software keys, there's nothing to see when the phone is powered off.
Nothing to see here.
For now, suffice it to say that Apple will have a hard time trying to persuade the Supreme Court next month that there's nothing to see (or review) here.
Nothing to see here folks... unless institutional law libraries (government ministries, courts, academic law libraries) are not supported.
Nothing to see here except the boss.
Nothing to see here.»
There was nothing to see out there, almost literally nothing: the ground outside the window dropped quickly away into a swale that was intended to carry off flood water.
Our Palm Springs personal injury attorney takes great interest in these cases and stops at nothing to see that the victims are treated fairly.
When that trust is betrayed, our malpractice attorneys stop at nothing to see justice done.
Mosey along now, nothing to see here.»)
Nothing to see here)
However, an impartial statistical analysis of these series says there's nothing to see here.
Oh well, nothing to see here, move on please.
Meanwhile, there was nothing to see on the southern elevation, where all the passive solar gains lie.
The fact is, depending on the haze, there can actually be nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here; just keep moving.
If you find yourself aligning with any of those folks, you can move along, nothing to see here.
... Move on people nothing to see here... A few lines away from his trend comments, Monckton acknowledges that the last decade was the warmest on record but indicates that it is part of a trend of 300 years of global warming.
No warming here, nothing to see, please go home, nothing «unprecedented» going on like the «alarmist warmers» would have you believe, just more global warming fraud.
Move on, nothing to see........
Or you might look at misbehavior which is all too common in ordinary pseudoscience disputes, but which in the physical and biological sciences is very uncommon on the funded academic side: e.g., triumphalism about unfalsifiable claims, and circling the wagons around various kinds of data hiding (e.g., remarkably lackadaisical formal investigation of CRU even after FOIA violations, and broad enthusiasm for promoting the formal results into an informal full «nothing to see here, move along» exoneration).
Nothing to see.
Climategate certainly showed that, as did their «nothing to see here, move on folks» response to it.
If the projected variation is below this threshold, move along, nothing to see.
Nothing to see there, move along.
Move along folks, nothing to see there, just another alarmist frothing at the mouth after drinking the kool aid.
This renders a «nothing to see here» conclusion impossible.
«nothing to see here» can only be supported now by providing positive evidence that the very significant change in CO2 level will have no effect, or that it happens all the time.
There is nothing to see here, so we must move on!
fredfriendly says: «It is really like the Star Wars part where Obi One says «nothing to see here, move along...»
That is not a good excuse for the «move along, nothing to see here» promotion from Andy Revkin, and I'm surprised to be seeing it here.
I am so not convinced by people saving move along, nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here, move on.
«Nothing to see here,» is of course what they are saying.
But once again it's more of the «nothing to see, move along» stuff we're oh - so - familiar with at this point in the century... they'll continue with no consequences, like Peter Gleick, they'll be invited to give speeches at the meetings.
This made me laugh with it's grudging nod to, and simultaneous breezy dismissal of the pause (nothing to see here, move along).
Now a supposedly independent review of the evidence says, in effect, «nothing to see here.»
It's just the law of energy conservation, nothing to see here, move along folks.
Then we had the hockey stick and climate gate, compounded by large parts of the scientific establishment closing ranks and saying «nothing to see here».