Not exact matches
The best way for employers to protect against unanticipated
notice liability related to
terminations of short service employees is through the preparation and execution
of employment agreements which contemplate the amount
of notice that the employee will receive
upon termination.
The Supreme Court has recently confirmed in Newcastle
upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood that in the absence
of any express provision in an
employment contract, written
notice of termination from an employer does not take effect until the employee has read it, or had a reasonable opportunity
of doing so...
(d)
Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as giving reasonable
notice to the client, allowing time for
employment of other counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment
of fee or expense that has not been earned or incurred.
In June 2002, the employer sent the employee a new contract that reduced the employee's entitlement
upon termination from two years» pay to three weeks»
notice or pay in lieu
of notice for each year
of employment, to a maximum
of thirty weeks.2 The employee refused to sign the new
employment contract.
In these circumstances, the issue would have become his
notice entitlement
upon termination, and in the absence
of an
employment agreement with an enforceable
termination clause that limited it, Simoes»
notice entitlement could have been quite substantial.
In order to provide a greater level
of certainty, federal employers should consider including language in their written
employment agreements that limits the amount
of notice and severance the employee is entitled to
upon termination of employment, but ensuring that this language provides for at least the minimum amounts required by the Code.
Some
of the most common are wrongful
termination, discrimination, retaliation, violations
of the Family Medical Leave Act, violations
of the Fair
Employment and Housing Act, Violations of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days upon resignation or termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately upon leaving when the employee gives fair notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees for
Employment and Housing Act, Violations
of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure
of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days
upon resignation or
termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours
of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately
upon leaving when the employee gives fair
notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce
employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees for
employment records
upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information
upon hiring, misclassification
of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification
of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees for expenses.
The legal obligation to make employee whole during the
notice period can be modified if the employee's
employment contract provides for another period
of notice will be provided to the employee
upon termination of employment.
Damages payable
upon termination of employment may include benefits during the reasonable
notice period, including any bonuses and other incentives that would otherwise have fallen due during that period.
The Supreme Court
of Canada held in Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd. 2 that if an
employment contract contains a
termination clause that provides an employee with an entitlement
upon termination other than reasonable
notice, that entitlement must be at least equal to the employee's minimum
notice and severance entitlements as set out in the ESA.
However, if an employer needs to rely
upon one
of the grounds under Section 119
of the LPA to terminate
employment without paying any statutory severance pay and / or
notice under Section 118
of the LPA or to protect an employer from a claim for unfair
termination, it is highly recommended that a written
notice be issued, which specifies clear and sufficient reasons for
termination in the
termination notice.
The Supreme Court
of Canada held in Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd5 that if an
employment contract contains a
termination clause that provides an employee with an entitlement
upon termination other than reasonable
notice, that entitlement must be at least equal to the employee's entitlement pursuant to the ESA.
Since the initial
Employment Offer did not expressly touch
upon the issue
of reasonable
notice for
termination without cause, it was an implied term
of the contract that the plaintiff was entitled to the common law standard
of reasonable
notice.
With respect to entitlement on
termination of employment, the
employment contract provided as follows for a without - cause
termination: Regular employees may be terminated at any time without cause
upon being given the minimum period
of notice prescribed by applicable legislation, or by being paid salary in lieu
of such
notice of as may otherwise be required by applicable legislation.
Each
of the five
employment contracts contained a contractual clause that intended to replace the Employee's right to common law notice upon termination, with the statutory minimums, under Ontario's employment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ES
employment contracts contained a contractual clause that intended to replace the Employee's right to common law
notice upon termination, with the statutory minimums, under Ontario's
employment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ES
employment standards legislation, the
Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ES
Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ESA»).
He then challenged his
termination and the adjudicator disagreed but relied in part on the fact his express terms
of employment said he could be terminated without cause
upon payment
of notice.