Sentences with phrase «notice upon the termination of his employment»

Not exact matches

The best way for employers to protect against unanticipated notice liability related to terminations of short service employees is through the preparation and execution of employment agreements which contemplate the amount of notice that the employee will receive upon termination.
The Supreme Court has recently confirmed in Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood that in the absence of any express provision in an employment contract, written notice of termination from an employer does not take effect until the employee has read it, or had a reasonable opportunity of doing so...
(d) Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned or incurred.
In June 2002, the employer sent the employee a new contract that reduced the employee's entitlement upon termination from two years» pay to three weeks» notice or pay in lieu of notice for each year of employment, to a maximum of thirty weeks.2 The employee refused to sign the new employment contract.
In these circumstances, the issue would have become his notice entitlement upon termination, and in the absence of an employment agreement with an enforceable termination clause that limited it, Simoes» notice entitlement could have been quite substantial.
In order to provide a greater level of certainty, federal employers should consider including language in their written employment agreements that limits the amount of notice and severance the employee is entitled to upon termination of employment, but ensuring that this language provides for at least the minimum amounts required by the Code.
Some of the most common are wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, violations of the Family Medical Leave Act, violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Violations of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days upon resignation or termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately upon leaving when the employee gives fair notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees forEmployment and Housing Act, Violations of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days upon resignation or termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately upon leaving when the employee gives fair notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees foremployment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees for expenses.
The legal obligation to make employee whole during the notice period can be modified if the employee's employment contract provides for another period of notice will be provided to the employee upon termination of employment.
Damages payable upon termination of employment may include benefits during the reasonable notice period, including any bonuses and other incentives that would otherwise have fallen due during that period.
The Supreme Court of Canada held in Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd. 2 that if an employment contract contains a termination clause that provides an employee with an entitlement upon termination other than reasonable notice, that entitlement must be at least equal to the employee's minimum notice and severance entitlements as set out in the ESA.
However, if an employer needs to rely upon one of the grounds under Section 119 of the LPA to terminate employment without paying any statutory severance pay and / or notice under Section 118 of the LPA or to protect an employer from a claim for unfair termination, it is highly recommended that a written notice be issued, which specifies clear and sufficient reasons for termination in the termination notice.
The Supreme Court of Canada held in Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd5 that if an employment contract contains a termination clause that provides an employee with an entitlement upon termination other than reasonable notice, that entitlement must be at least equal to the employee's entitlement pursuant to the ESA.
Since the initial Employment Offer did not expressly touch upon the issue of reasonable notice for termination without cause, it was an implied term of the contract that the plaintiff was entitled to the common law standard of reasonable notice.
With respect to entitlement on termination of employment, the employment contract provided as follows for a without - cause termination: Regular employees may be terminated at any time without cause upon being given the minimum period of notice prescribed by applicable legislation, or by being paid salary in lieu of such notice of as may otherwise be required by applicable legislation.
Each of the five employment contracts contained a contractual clause that intended to replace the Employee's right to common law notice upon termination, with the statutory minimums, under Ontario's employment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ESemployment contracts contained a contractual clause that intended to replace the Employee's right to common law notice upon termination, with the statutory minimums, under Ontario's employment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ESemployment standards legislation, the Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ESEmployment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41 (the «ESA»).
He then challenged his termination and the adjudicator disagreed but relied in part on the fact his express terms of employment said he could be terminated without cause upon payment of notice.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z