If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out
of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used as the latest red herring distraction
in the global warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records»
in a too limited
time span without relevant context, which, just
in case some may not have
noticed does not represent the region known as planet Earth, uses too
short a
time span in relation to mechanism outside
of the examined region because it is
in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a red herring distraction
in the argument between science and science denialism regarding global warming.