For years I struggled with doubts about my faith, and through the emerging church movement, I found people who were asking the very same questions - about religious pluralism, the Problem of Evil, inerrancy,
the notion of absolute truth, etc..
Not exact matches
For one thing, Hegel says as much: «As science,
truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape
of the self, so that the
absolute truth of being is the known
Notion and the
Notion as such is the
absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende).
So long has been the tradition behind the
notion of time's contingency that it has acquired the strength
of an
absolute truth.
He posited that al - amr had normative polarity within it, namely al - haqq (the
Truth) and al - khalq (Creation).33 He described al - haqq by the term al - wujud al - mahd (sheer being [SB]-RRB- 34 SB paralleled the idea
of God described by Michael Sells as «God - in - himself» or that aspect
of God that is
absolute and unconditional essence — remote and mysterious; wrathful and majestic.35 This idea equals the
notions of sat in Upadhyaya.
«In the face
of this fact, very simple logic and rationale dictates that the
notions you subscribe to are the religious creations
of the human mind, and not
absolute truth.»
It's weird to me because 50 %
of what this guy said was
absolute bullshit (ie: creatine as good as steroids, kali muscle being natural, or the ridiculous
notion that they actually drug - test WWF wrestlers) but the other 50 %
of what he said was the god's honest
truth.