At Wiffen Litigation, we have appeared before the Court of
Appeal and Divisional Court
on a number of cases,
on issues ranging from procedural motions to multi-day hearings where
novel issues of law are being decided.
As an aside,
on granting permission to
appeal (as an application for permission to appeal had to be issued as the Judge had rejected the oral application for permission to appeal at the original hearing), the Court of Appeal had recognised that it was unusual for an exercise of judicial discretion to be appealed but stated that the decision of His Honour Judge Purle QC was highly speculative as to «border on the Micawberism» (which those of you versed in classic literature will recognise as a reference to a character in the Charles Dickens novel, David Copperfield, who continually holds blind faith that «something will turn up&ra
appeal (as an application for permission to
appeal had to be issued as the Judge had rejected the oral application for permission to appeal at the original hearing), the Court of Appeal had recognised that it was unusual for an exercise of judicial discretion to be appealed but stated that the decision of His Honour Judge Purle QC was highly speculative as to «border on the Micawberism» (which those of you versed in classic literature will recognise as a reference to a character in the Charles Dickens novel, David Copperfield, who continually holds blind faith that «something will turn up&ra
appeal had to be
issued as the Judge had rejected the oral application for permission to
appeal at the original hearing), the Court of Appeal had recognised that it was unusual for an exercise of judicial discretion to be appealed but stated that the decision of His Honour Judge Purle QC was highly speculative as to «border on the Micawberism» (which those of you versed in classic literature will recognise as a reference to a character in the Charles Dickens novel, David Copperfield, who continually holds blind faith that «something will turn up&ra
appeal at the original hearing), the Court of
Appeal had recognised that it was unusual for an exercise of judicial discretion to be appealed but stated that the decision of His Honour Judge Purle QC was highly speculative as to «border on the Micawberism» (which those of you versed in classic literature will recognise as a reference to a character in the Charles Dickens novel, David Copperfield, who continually holds blind faith that «something will turn up&ra
Appeal had recognised that it was unusual for an exercise of judicial discretion to be
appealed but stated that the decision of His Honour Judge Purle QC was highly speculative as to «border
on the Micawberism» (which those of you versed in classic literature will recognise as a reference to a character in the Charles Dickens
novel, David Copperfield, who continually holds blind faith that «something will turn up»).