As climatologist Tim Ball summarized «Beck's work completely undermined the IPCC claims and assumptions about the role of CO2 in man - made Global Warming, then Global Warming, then Climate Change, and
now Global Climate Disruptions.»
Not exact matches
Now, White House science adviser John Holdren is renewing his call for a new nomenclature to describe the end result of dumping vast quantities of carbon dioxide and other heat - trapping gases into Earth's atmosphere: «
global climate disruption.»
Should those anomalies turn negative... well, Perhaps that is why we have a new phrase to replace «
global warming» followed by «
climate change»
now apparently we have «
climate disruption» which of course can be USED to «prove» whatever those advocates of CAGW want..
Those focused both on humanitarian relief efforts, often a military mission, and on combating rising instances of extremism (which are often fueled by economic desperation or inability to access shelter, food, and water) are
now very concerned about the impact of
climate change
disruptions on
global stability.
Beck's work completely undermined their major claims and assumptions about the role of CO2 in
Global Warming, then
Climate Change, and
now Climate Disruptions.
Climate disruption deniers have been claiming for years
now that the
global temperature has been cooling down, even though the temperature data clearly shows that it isn't.
As this concession ocurred it manifested to the unwashed masses as «
global warming» was first replaced by «
climate change» and
now is morphing yet again into «
climate disruption».