But, because the water vapor and CO2 spectra overlap, the total increase is actually only about 7 % since the water vapor is
now absorbing radiation previously absorbed by CO2.
Not exact matches
Ultraviolet light from early, blueish stars (illustrated) interacted with hydrogen gas, causing it to
absorb background
radiation, and creating a signature scientists have
now detected.
In addition, they must have been able to resist the biologically destructive ultraviolet
radiation in sunlight, which was not
absorbed by a layer of ozone as it is
now.
We
now put an air parcel between the observer and the back wall, a parcel which
absorbs IR
radiation exiting from the wall to the observer.
It is true that this lost solar heating
now adds to the LW flux coming from below, but the skin layer only
absorbs a tiny fraction of that, so the increase in absorped LW flux from below is less than the decrease in the
absorbed SW
radiation.
The fact that CO2
absorbs and re-emits long - wave
radiation has been pretty well established for well over a century
now.
Now the
radiation pressure in the cavity between surface and
absorber has increased by a factor of 2.7, due to the higher temperature, but the additional expansion and cooling this causes is still utterly negligible (a further 1.7 parts in 1E11).
Now with absorptivity (the proportion of incident
radiation absorbed) set at 0.8, while the emissivity varies.
If CO2 and H2O molecules
now are cooled below the previous equilibrium point by having their
radiation allowed to escape to outer space, then I believe these molecules must then tend to
absorb more energy than yield energy with each interaction with the other components of the atmosphere until that atmosphere as a whole reaches a new thermal equilibrium where the net
radiation going out and the net
radiation coming in (primarily from the sun and the surrounding atmosphere) is the same.
Then that lowest atmosphere layer emit and a 50 - 50 split sends it half up and half down; and the up ward is again
absorbed by a higher and
now cooler layer; which in turn emits but
now at a lower temperature; until finally some much higher and much cooler layer gets to emit
radiation that actually escapes to space and that radiating temperature is the one that must balance with the incoming TSI insolation rate.
Now Chilingar and his colleagues bring out the simple equation balancing the effective
radiation temperature of the earth with the solar
radiation absorbed.
However, a darker Earth
now absorbs more sunlight, tipping the scales to net warming from shortwave
radiation.»
That greenhouse gases being absent does not effect the one third of solar
radiation being
absorbed by clouds Or the surface albedo can jump from 12 % to 30 % Or the greenhouse gases being absent but still have clouds to reflect
radiation Or the IR (not
now absorbed) by the clouds will not obey Kirchoff's Law on reaching the planet surface And so on.
Now there is this theory according to which addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will cause the air to get warm because carbon dioxide
absorbs outgoing infrared
radiation and converts it to heat.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right
now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal
radiation / heat energy
absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.
Now the water (H2O) in the form of a liquid or ice crystals, can and does scatter and reflect a good bit of the
radiation that impinges on it, but in the case of the LWIR, I would expect it still to be mostly
absorbed by the water rather than refected.
That changes the colour of the water very noticeably meaning that
radiation at certain wavelengths which previously would have passed straight through is
now absorbed.
In other words, * we can observe the increase of CO2 in atmosphere above the ocean, * CO2
absorbs some part of the outgoing
radiation from the surface of the ocean which increases somewhat the temperature of the air * The increasing of temperature causes the (slight) increase of the (already existing) back
radiation * This (
now increased) back
radiation is
absorbed by the surface skin layer of the ocean which means that the energy delivered by the back
radiation to the surface skin layer is
now slightly higher * This additional energy will
now be distributed over the channels that are participating in the heat transfer from the
absorbing surface skin layer to both the air above the skin layer and the bulk of the ocean.
CO2 intercepts and
absorbs this energy and
now CO2 warms up respectively and therefore begins to increase it's
radiation, — half of which (estimates may vary) returns to the surface and is
now near to the end of it's first circuit.
This is important with regard to H20, as humidity drops rapidly and the wave lengths that are
absorbed by this molecule
now escape at a greatly increased rate and so back
radiation diminishes accordingly.
That happens partly through «new» absorption of
radiation that more or less used to escape directly from the surface, as well as absorption and re-emission of
radiation that used to get
absorbed and re-emitted at lower layers, but
now (at higher CO2) does so at higher layers.
In this case, what happens is the whole surface - atmospheric column is
now receiving more (
absorbed) solar
radiation than it is emitting terrestrial
radiation to space.