Sentences with phrase «now as a data scientist»

Not exact matches

As a result of that buying spree, Salesforce now fields a team of 175 data scientists that are «stitching together this amazing platform,» Benioff noted.

«Since the impact presented no technical problems for the health and safety of the instrument, the team is only now announcing this event as a fascinating example of how engineering data can be used, in ways not previously anticipated, to understand what is happing to the spacecraft over 236,000 miles (380,000 kilometers) from the Earth,» said John Keller, LRO project scientist from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

One was Nathan VanderKraats, a former postdoc who told everyone how much he now enjoys his job as a data scientist and technical lead at... wait for it... Monsanto.

Scientists now have much more information about faults both major and minor; just as significant, they have developed a much keener sense of how to proceed when data are lacking.

Just months earlier, he and Joshua Kalla, political scientists now at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, and the University of California (UC), Berkeley, respectively, had exposed a study published by Science in 2014 as likely resting completely on fake data.

Now NASA has set up video conferencing and computer data links, so that engineers and scientists anywhere in the US can stay in touch with the testing programme — just as if they were working in California.

Now, using the Doppler effect to add a third dimension to their data, the scientists have been able to measure the speed of the moving plasma, as well as its direction, temperature and density.

This gap in research has now been closed by scientists of the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT): They compared the performances of 49,000 battery electric cars and 73,000 plug - in hybrid vehicles in Germany and the US using data from fleet trials and automotive manufacturers as well as from websites for drivers to manage and monitor their vehicles.

«Scientists have developed indicators for biodiversity, such as land cover type, and modern ecological models that can digest satellite data and information on species occurrence are now offering near - real time monitoring of the land management impacts on biodiversity.

Kepler project scientist Nick Gautier of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory presented new data at the meeting on three of the larger planets in the Kepler - 20 system, now officially known as Kepler - 20b, -20 c and -20 d. From the star's wobbles, observed with ground - based telescopes, Gautier and his colleagues were able to deduce the masses of Kepler - 20b and -20 c: 8.7 and 16.1 Earth masses, respectively.

Scientists have learned that the brain undergoes structural changes as it absorbs sensory data, learns and adapts, but the actual mechanism of this process is just now coming into view.

Now, one would think that a good scientist like Marzluff, on receiving this data from an experiment that he and his student performed themselves, might scratch his head and say — maybe cats really aren't as bad as we thought.

He's already called for a moratorium on all regulations, blasted the chairman of the Federal Reserve as «treasonous», and, now, he's stating outright that he believes global warming is a hoax stirred up by scientists who «manipulated data».

Regarding the Hockey Stick of IPCC 2001 evidence now indicates, in my view, that an IPCC Lead Author working with a small cohort of scientists, misrepresented the temperature record of the past 1000 years by (a) promoting his own result as the best estimate, (b) neglecting studies that contradicted his, and (c) amputating another's result so as to eliminate conflicting data and limit any serious attempt to expose the real uncertainties of these data.

I do not care if misguided scientists did not want to release data (it's immaterial now anyway — Best, Giss, etc all show similar figures) Steve: if the situation is as serious as you surmise, then you should blame Jones, CRU and the University of East Anglia for their obstruction of data requests.

That isn't the same thing as saying all climate scientists don't reveal code and data, now is it?

The tiny, close - knit clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the «global warming» fraud — for fraud is what we now know it to be — tampered with temperature data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures.

The unfortunate use of the term «pause / hiatus» has seeped over into the general climate scientist population now: this has had the effect of inadvertently framing discussions over the global temperature data as being about explaining the so - called pause, even though the very notion isn't statistically supported.

He spent the last 14 years of his career at NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (now NCEI) as a Principal Scientist, where he served as a Supervisory Meteorologist until 2012.

While the law protects pure opinion from being regarded as defamation, multiple judges have now ruled that accusing a scientist of fraud and data manipulation goes beyond that standard, and that Mann's case can go forward.

It is also possible, as your presentation suggests, that our ability to determine sea level rise globally is so distorted by local variations that the data now available to climate scientists like yourself is all but meaningless.»

Originally hired by the MA public defender agency as a staff attorney, he now serves as their data scientist.