Sentences with phrase «now claims he did»

And, matched with the fact that his name was on books that he now claims he didn't actually write, what does that say about the guy?

Not exact matches

It's certainly a lot closer to driving the change Victoria's Secret claims it wants to see, instead of what it's doing now which is maintaining the structure that actually keeps people poor — and kids slaving away in cotton fields.

Now, «authentic» has become the word you use to claim a particular heritage when, actually, you don't have any.

As Theranos continues to spiral downward, its investors are now claiming the company threatened to file for bankruptcy protection if they don't give up their rights to sue the startup over its faulty blood - testing business, Bloomberg reported.

At the best of times, everything a CMO does is a gamble with ephemeral and uncertain results; that's a hundred times truer now, with marketing tools multiplying faster than anyone could truthfully claim to keep up with.

The critics of Google's (goog) effort to promote workforce diversity now include one of its own former recruiters, who claims in a lawsuit he was fired because he didn't toe the line on rejecting white and Asian male job candidates.

Now, I don't claim that startup studios are better than accelerators; I simply think accelerators leave a lot of opportunities on the table.

Now, don't go claiming Atlas Shrugged as your own.

«Despite claims to the contrary, Western Digital does not now possess any legal «rights» to participate in this phase of investment, which is an important investment in the next generation of flash memory.»

There is also the «claim now, claim more later» approach, which can also result in bigger lifetime benefits, even if it doesn't always increase monthly benefits.

Red Hat, which promised a few months ago to hit $ 2 billion in annual revenue, has done so and now claims to be the world's first open - source company to reach that milestone.

Additionally, Rubicon now claims that its 2014 audited net revenue was $ 2.163 million, which does not reflect what was presented in either pitch deck.

He claims that he can now get the same amount done in half the time.

Pretty much everyone took the move as meaning just that, but Xi has now claimed he is «personally opposed» to life - long rule, and the term - limit removal was more about aligning the post of presidency with that of top posts in the Communist Party, which Xi also holds, and which don't come with term limits.

More from Personal Finance: Taking the medical expense deduction is now easier Don't buy your bitcoin from a place that could disappear overnight If you want to claim this tax credit, you need to come clean to the IRS first

But instead of just repeating his claim that he didn't collude with Russia, Trump is now targeting the man leading the probe.

As the article mentions, «71 % of consumers now claim that loyalty incentive - programs don't make them loyal at all.»

In other words, plan fiduciaries now will have greater freedom to expend portfolio resources to effect liberal social goals simply by claiming that they think doing so will have long - term benefits without having to quantify those benefits.

Managers of big banks claim that they can't fund themselves with more equity and still lend as much as they do now because stock holders require a higher rate of return than lenders do.

At the time, the firm gave Facebook a written statement that any data it had collected was deleted, but now Zuckerberg said he wishes Facebook had actually done its own check to confirm that claim.

If Cambridge Analytica had been using the illicit Facebook data for years already — and The New York Times reports that it did not delete all the data that it had claimed — there's no telling who else has copies, copies that wouldn't be easily found by Facebook auditors now.

Now, as for Maurice Raymond Greenberg's claim that he had nothing to do with the wreck of AIG, let me simply say that he should shoulder a lot of the blame.

Now, none other than the controversial academic Stanley Fish claims that doctors and nurses who don't wish to take human life as part of their medical work should just get over it.

Now the fact that 80 % of Americans claim to be Christians what does that tell you about your religion.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

and only now, 2000 years later, do we have the technological resources to test that — and the data confirms the claims of the accounts.

If modern Christians have a sense of martyrdom as you claim then please feel free to debate them in the here and now... I don't hear a lot of Christians saying «you can't say / do this because 2,000 years ago Rome was busy killing us.»

YOU said dismissal of what NOW you are saying I'm NOT doing, was a «faith claim» So, you changed the goal - post already?

The mysteries of the brain may be virtually endless, but a team of researchers from two institutes in Göttingen, Germany now claim to have an answer for at least one question that has remained a puzzle: just how fast does the brain forget information?

If he now doesn't want to make the claim that mercy is essential to God, I don't see how he can make the argument that mercy should be the key to understanding the other attributes.

The news also did a story awhile ago about defectors from America, now living in North Korea, who claimed to escape capitalism.

Now if Taliban or AlQ did that then how can they be Muslims or Claim to be Muslims or we as Muslims be be lamed for their acts that are non of Islam as a religion??

Let me help Nathan out a bit... Christ, if you are a medical student as still think that the theory of evolution claims that the human body happened «randomly,» please leave school now and do not endanger people's lives.

What this man did was absolutely horrible and now he claims that God told him so.

Now, you claim the others were atheist, but did they do what they did in the name of atheism, like so many religious zealots have claimed they did things for their gods?

Must I now believe in smurfs to claim they don't exist?

Now, if I buy on that claim and it fails; do I get my money back?

However the NIV inserts a word not in the Greek, so 4:6 reads «this is why the Gospel was preached even to those who are now dead...» The translators admit the «now» is not in the Greek but say that they put it there to make clear that the passage doesn't refer to post mortem opportunity which they claim is ruled out by Hebrews 9:27 «it is appointed unto to man once to die and then comes judgement».

I have been struggling with this question for several years now, and while I am not ready to claim I have a «solution» (nothing but pride would make such a claim), I do have a theological hypothesis which will be tested against Scripture.

Now, where did I claim superiority?

The Bible is the evidence that it DID happen, and now you want to claim it didn't happDID happen, and now you want to claim it didn't happen.

It's like a small scared child in a dark room claiming there is some monster out there in the darkness so you turn on the lights to show him there is no monster, but he just get's more scared claiming the monster must have hid in the closet or under the bed or anywhere you havn't yet looked, and when you do look and show them nothing is there it doesn't make them relieved, they get more upset because they now believe the monster is super fast or invisible or can teleport, because they know it's there, they can just feel it!

Now the claim that could appropriately be advanced on behalf of this form of panpsychism in respect of considerations of parsimony would be that it does with fewer kinds of entity what it would be vain to do with more — that it does with one kind of entity what the dualist only achieves with two.

Now, tell me: What claims did I just make?

And now to address the argument in three parts... First, there is an assumption that atheists claim to know with faith - based, dogmatic, absolute certainty that gods does not exist.

Panthrotheism does not discriminate or believe the bible is wrong, in analogy no one can claim that our human ancestors are wrong because they were naked or ate raw meats.We have now to accept that we are evolving.What is important that we survive.and still love each other in general despite conflicts.No one is wrong in believing and practicing any religion that is pro life.Some people thinks that any contadiction to classical faith is wrong, un aware that humans survive the trials in history was because of change and adaptation, in short evolution.its not anti religiom

So the soul cries again, now to say, «0 God, since You have made me and I didn't ask to come here I surely have some claim upon You, and I insist that..

Markets, I now am claiming, exhibit behavior that Jesus would have approved of — in fact, behavior that he did, textually, once in a while, approve of.

Now this does not in any way say that works earn you a rightful place in heaven, but that many will claim to be saved, know of God but continue to be evil, or get saved just to save their butt and not because they truly love and honor Christ.

She claims she lives a «much more honest life now than I've ever done.»