Sentences with phrase «now have answers to those questions»

That's also the end of the night for Keuchel, so now we have an answer to the question posed at the start of tonight's game: it was Keuchel's dominance of the Yankees against the Yankees» dominance at home, and the latter has won out.
Update: Well, we now have the answer to the question about Republican senators from this WSJ column by John Cornyn...»

Not exact matches

As to the question of when he and his party will develop a broad and substantive legislative platform to tackle the critical challenges America faces, McConnell has a ready answer as well: «If we're in the majority,» he says, «we'll be sitting down, intensely, a year from now on the very issue you've raised.»
«We did face supply chain challenges last year, but the full - price channels in North America are now clean,» Edwards said in emailed answers to questions from Reuters, referring to new stock that would not have to be discounted.
Then I'd ask them by a show of hands how many of them answered the question from the perspective of «this room, in this course, the one they just happen to have scheduled right now
The first question the administration has to answer is why now.
«Those are exactly the questions that we are answering now, I don't have answers for you on any of those,» McKenzie said in reference to various questions on whether troops would be allowed to carry weapons.
Now I've got the audience thinking.Three to four seconds is just enough time to think of one or two answers to my question.
RICHARD FISHER: Well, I always concluded my speeches at the Fed saying, «And now, I'd be happy to avoid answering your questions
Now that CrunchBase has a strong data set for female founders, as well as investing partners, answers to these questions are within reach.
Now I have another question that I think I know the answer to, but just want to confirm.
Every tech company has increased political spending over the last few years, and the amount of tech money circulating in D.C. will skyrocket now that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been hauled before Congress to answer questions about the myriad ways in which his company is harming America and the world.
«Now since we still don't know what Cambridge Analytica has done with this data, you heard chairman thune say, as we had discussed, we want to haul Cambridge Analytica in to answer these questions at a separate hearing.»
Given that spreading ownership of capital and increasing employees» share in economic rewards has bipartisan appeal, 37 the only valid answer to the question by Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, or other time travelers is that, after four decades of neglecting policies to stimulate broad - based profit sharing and employee share ownership, we have changed course and are now placing them in the policy portfolio, if not at the center of economic policymaking that they occupied from the days of Washington to Lincoln.
Now what would be fun is to go and link every single one with either a Bigger Pockets success story or an answer to a question in the forums.
Advertisers Can Now Target Quora Users Via Their Email Address Question - and - answer service Quora has added a feature allowing marketers to target its users by e-mail, with its new List Match Audience update announced recently, expanding on the firm's advertising platform.
MariaDB is pleased to announce that we now have a dedicated time each week when we answer new contributor questions live on IRC.
Now I'll try to answer the first part of your question: ``... what would be your core, what would be your aggressive picks and how would you organize that.»
Now I have questions and you need to start answering.
Venture capitalists and entrepreneurs forecast the lawsuit will have a chilling effect on the next generation of talent, with one telling Recode that Benchmark will now undoubtedly have to answer «awkward questions in a lot of deals for the foreseeable future.»
For some time now, Quora and Yahoo! Answers have been the two best places for finding answers to all your queAnswers have been the two best places for finding answers to all your queanswers to all your questions.
and maybe, just maybe, you would be compelled by the lord almighty to answer questions you will not answer now.
@Chad — «answer the question now, no ducking and dodging» Once again, that is a dishonest question, delivered in a manner one would expect to hear on a school yard.
And I'm pretty positive it's not going to happen in my lifetime, but now that I've said that I'll probably be raptured right in the middle of answering this question (or you'll be raptured right in the middle of the answer).
Well now I find this to me an interesting question: Thank's to a small minded bigot named James Earl Ray humanity has been robbed of an answer to that question.
Now, to put an end to this... I've already answered your questions so I will not admit to something that I've already shown I'm not.
As for the answer to the Ozzy's question, we have no idea, and we've been trying to figure it out for a while now.
Now i know that some of these questions could bring up a very long and complicated answer which i wouldnt mind personally but for the sake of my paper i would appreciate if you could make short and to the point answers.
The mysteries of the brain may be virtually endless, but a team of researchers from two institutes in Göttingen, Germany now claim to have an answer for at least one question that has remained a puzzle: just how fast does the brain forget information?
My life is much simpler now that I've been able to replace that list with a single answer for all of these questions: There is no God.
Now, instead of having to rationalize one thing after another I have one answer that answers every single question: There is no god.
Too bad it wasn't more serious, now he's gonna have to answer more questions when the world doesn't end in October
A Chinese Christian's hopes for asylum in America now have new life, after an appellate court overturned a denial from a judge who found that the applicant's answers to questions about Christianity were «hesitant» and «evasive.»
If you have any questions, you can rely on Christ to provide any answers you need if you haven't received them already, please don't forget the power of prayer and the strength he can provide for you now that he's here on earth.....
Rollo May has put us particularly in his debt by his insistence that an «ontology of human existence» is required even with the strict limits of psychological theory.16 But now we go beyond the general doctrine of man to the Christian answer to the religious question.
I guess the answer will be NO... no one can deny the past whether it was ten years or hundreds... now the question is to believe in the past, there are diff opinions, here comes the question which one to believe... what are the criterias to use in order for me to accept one out of many... we have to use our intellect in this regards...
Now I can think of all kinds of questions I ask myself and my friends about God and faith and life, questions I'm not as sure I have the answers to as I used to be.
Right now if you ask me what religion idoes Obama practice, I would not be able to answer that question.
Men are moving away from the forms and trappings of Judaism and Christianity not because they have stopped searching for transcendental answers to the fundamental questions of human life, but because that search has now intensified beyond measure.»
Eventually, the science community will be able to answer the questions, they've already answered many that people thought was a god and now we know it's not.
If it wasn't now is the time to address any issues you have with what I said... otherwise I don't want to see you posting that «no one has answered this question properly».
Having answered their questions, Jesus now turns to providing some application.
Now that I have complained about the answer given, I do have to admit I like the way you expanded the question to encompass all of the perceived periods of silence.
Hausman had taken a more standard line on Bergson, although in the dialogue below it will be clear that Hausman is pondering in a preliminary way the very questions he has answered above.1 It must be clear to anyone who has read Hausman's paper above that his view regarding Bergson has now changed, and I think greatly to his credit, and to Gunter's.
After eight years of doing this and now dealing with two teenagers living under my very own roof who ask the same question, I've got the answers down pat and can dismiss my students at the bell confident that they have at least a hazy sense that maybe going to church next Sunday wouldn't be a complete waste of their time.
You STILL have not faced and answered my questions, and it now appears you can't, or don't want to face the ramifications.
Truthfully (as with a lot of things in my life right now), I have no immediate answers to your questions.
In answer to the first part of your question I think now might be a good time to have such conversations because I think we are more open to this than ever before.
I agree that tyhose who lived two thousand years may have come up with some far out ways to address the big questions we still can not answer such as how something came from nothing - George Gamow and his big bang 1500 years from now may very well seem just as stupid.
are questions we have tried to answer by drawing upon resources of inquiry now available that were not accessible in other times.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z