Sentences with phrase «now proven this theory»

Roger Haut, a University Distinguished Professor in biomechanics, and Todd Fenton, a forensic anthropologist, have now proven this theory false.

Not exact matches

Final Holt: As for the theory that the BoC can cut now with zero risk and take it back with future rate hikes to offset easing should it prove to be unnecessary, don't be so sure.
Now, if you want to talk about religious theory, that's a different definition, as religious theory is based on belief and assumption and written statements that can not be verified or proven without having faith and belief.
HASA if u r so sure about what we don't know but yet find the parts that we know as something to pick and choose from then how different are u from the Copernicus affair Pope who excommunicated him for presenting a theory now proven.
I can prove the existence and explanation for fossils and evolution, electrons, neutrons, dinosaur's, and now the big band theory.
How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!
Piper, when a scientific theory is proven incorrect, scientists celebrate for now they have more to learn and new ways to approach learning.
Good in theory, but now resulting in manufactured revenge accusations against minority communities where a blasphemy charge is hard to prove, frequently goes the way of the mob, is used to settle old grudges and I believe carries the death penalty.
but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.
Darwin's theory of evolution, on the other hand, now 160 years old, is still by no means proven and its effect on souls has been, and continues to be, horrendous!
With respect to this evidence, I shall now proceed to argue (1) that the experiences Whitehead cites do not prove what they need to prove in order to substantiate his theory, (2) that we do not actually have such experiences anyway, at least not in the form Whitehead describes them, and (3) that such experiences of causes and effects together, when they involve a reference to the subject experiencing them, seem in principle to be impossible.
As Justin concludes, «The biological theories have the most evidence to support them right now, but even they have lots of questions, and at this point, we can't «prove» anything.
Use your current «science» theory and now PROVE humans did this independent of experiment.
There is also that theory that losing one player can open the door for another and this could prove top be the case for Chambers, who is now likely to feature in Europe and the cup.
A study carried out by environmental scientists from the University of Basel has now shown that although the research community considers this to be a proven theory, no studies have been published to confirm it.
This theory has now been proven wrong, in fruit flies at least.
Some of the higher - dimensional spaces now called Calabi - Yau spaces proved fundamental to string theory.
Now an Israeli physicist predicts that a similar but far more subtle anomaly in the orbits of the planets, if detected, might prove his own theory, known as modified Newtonian dynamics, or MOND.
«I am absolutely thrilled that now, only seven years after our predictions, the Hubble Space Telescope has enabled us to make these incredibly faint observations and proved the theory right,» he said.
Until now, they had no way to prove the theory.
But physicists have been chasing that dream for decades now, and some like Smolin, a highly regarded physicist at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario, and Woit, a mathematician at Columbia University, argue that string theory has had ample time to prove itself.
Now it's, again — as I've emphasized earlier — it's not a question of strictly proving or strictly disproving string theory; that's beyond even the Hadron Collider's ability.
Now there are specific types of phenomena that string theory would prove or would predict that the Hadron Collider might see.
Now, iron - rich particles from steel manufacturing and coal burning, collected in the East China Sea, have been found to have a thick sulphate coating containing soluble iron that provides the «smoking gun'to prove the theory of acid iron dissolution.
The whole «lipid theory» of heart disease, a theory now thoroughly proven false, was used to condemn saturated fats and encourage people to start consuming the newer polyunsaturated fats.
For now this is just a theory but evidence is being collected to either counter or prove it.
Vivian, a snooty Brit, has come to Florida — the divorce capital of America, as she insists — to find couples who will prove her theory: Monogamy is not a sustainable concept, now that life expectancies are so long.
The platform is open to course developers, business trainers, and teachers who are now able to create unique educational products aimed at the development of skills, as well as provide simulation based training, which is proven to add to learning retention based on experience rather than theory.
For example, Michael Deshotels, a former executive director of the Louisiana Association of Educators who is now a paid lobbyist for the union, claimed in a recent blog post that the NAEP results prove White «has failed miserably at all his efforts and our children have suffered while he experimented with untested, unsound theories
We have repeatedly asked for better - prepared teachers with a decent salary to match; they put forth merit pay and career ladders based on an unproven, and now statistically dis - proven, theory of reforms.
At 1.2 GHz, the Qualcomm processor is more powerful in theory, but there aren't any benchmark apps like the ones we use to test Android tablets right now, so there's no way to prove this.
This is one theory you can test (and prove) right now!
What began as a theory has now been proven through extensive research by a team of over 220 vets, PhD nutritionists and food scientists.
Now when they compare the predictions of this compliant herd with actual reality and note that not once (so far) have any of them been proven correct with any theories that warming is other than benign or beneficial, then that's real science, ie the comparison of hypothesis with real data.
Now I can focus on my real passion: proving that evolution theory is wrong & must be replaced by Intelligent Design.
Now in both cases some of the elements of it are unknown or not yet nailed down, but the over all theory is sound and proven again and again from a variety of sources and literally thousands of different scientists in many different fields.
Also See: Watch Now: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming&raqNow: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming&raqnow akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming&raqnow because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming&raqnow the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»
From your last sentence any day now we can expect the theory of gravity to be proved wrong.
For you to maintain your support of your theory you must now prove my alternative wrong.
GCS Editor: We're not entirely convinced of the CFC angle — it's never been proven that the ozone hole (which we now know comes and goes) was affected by CFCs, but the cosmic ray theory makes sense.
Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking Gore's «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»
Now, let's recall that «confirmation» refers to a finding that increases the probability of a proposition, without necessarily proving it (in science, hypotheses and theories are rarely provable but often confirmable).
If she can prove her theory right, there is now a new object in the library that outputs predictions of ice extent.
If CAGW theory was proven true as based on this paper then why aren't the ocean's boiling right now at almost 400ppm CO2?
Now that my previous theory about Google and Amazon stepping back from hardware has been proved wrong (thanks for that guys), where do we go from here?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z