Sentences with phrase «now uses less fuel»

Mazda's innovative idling stop system, i - stop, now uses less fuel at restart and operates with greater frequency, contributing to better than ever fuel savings.

Not exact matches

But already we know that we can accomplish our purposes with far less energy than we now use and that other means of fueling cars and heating homes are being developed.

Combination of economic trends and policies Still, for now an array of Obama administration actions and economic trends are conspiring to cut emissions, according to EIA: Americans are using less oil because of high gasoline prices; carmakers are complying with federal fuel economy standards; electricity companies are becoming more efficient; state renewable energy rules are ushering wind and solar energy onto the power grids; gas prices are competitive with coal; and federal air quality regulations are closing the dirtiest power plants.

Ekmark says we are now entering an era in which vehicles will also gather real - time information about the weather and highway hazards, using this to improve fuel efficiency and make life less stressful for the driver and safer for all road users.

Although engines now emit less diesel exhaust, thanks to mechanical improvements and the use of cleaner - burning fuel, diesel exhaust is still dangerously widespread.

The fuel that is broken down and used for good energy within the body is now turning that source into a negative after the time eating window and we become less insulin responsive and our bodies do not function to its full capacity based on the 12 - hour eating clock.

On sale Now / mid - 2012 (convertible / coupe) Price $ 113,995 / $ 106,995 (convertible / coupe) Engine 4.4 L twin - turbo V - 8, 560 hp, 500 lb - ft Feeding the rivalry Despite more power, this M car's biggest achievement is that it uses 23 percent less fuel than the old one.

While some BMW purists may forwn at the news that the 1 Series now features three - cylinder engine borrowed from MINI, the fact that the model now has a version that uses less fuel than a purpose - built hybrid does say a lot.

Similar improvements in performance have also been done to the JCW — the car now does 0 - 100 km / h in 6.9 seconds, 80 - 120 km / h in 7.6 seconds and 229 km / h, all while sipping less fuel than before (combined, it uses 7.1 litres per 100 km).

Although the new 3.0 - litre turbo - diesel V6 engine is less powerful now, it uses significantly less fuel, emits less carbon dioxide and is Euro 6 compliant.

But in any event, we are now forced to consume and spend less because debt from now on is going to be harder to get, and we are also forced to use less fossil fuels because they are already too expensive.

But another approach is to find ways to use a lot less of the fossil fuels that we are now using wastefully.

Ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel has 99.5 percent less sulfur — and is now produced for all highway and non-road uses, allowing for dramatically reduced nitrogen oxide emissions from newer diesel engines.

Absent some crash programs for renewables (or temporary reprieve via unconventional fossil fuels), civilization must get by on a small fraction of the energy it now uses (and in far less convenient forms).

The analysis concludes that even a less ambitious climate goal, like a 3 °C rise in average global temperature or more, which would pose significantly greater risks for our society and economy, would still imply significant constraints on our use of fossil fuel reserves between now and 2050.

They believe the transition to a wind & solar powered energy grid could be made in two decades or less using current technology, and at an affordable cost — but only if the many roadblocks now being thrown up by nuclear and fossil fuel interests can be overcome.

So less fuel used overall means more reserves to last longer for the almost 7 billion people living on Earth as of right now and less pollution.

In addition, Ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel now produced for all highway and non-road uses has 99.7 percent less sulfur, allowing for dramatically reduced nitrogen oxide emissions in newer diesel engines.

As I have provided clear reasons to not treat the fact that the globally poorest will suffer most from climate change as a reason to not reduce fossil fuel use, we are now only discussing whether or not mentioning the disproportionate impact of global warming on the poor is more or less likely to persuade people to modify their behaviour and reduce emissions.

The original headline of the article said we had 5 years but now it's less than 2 years to stop building any new stuff that uses fossil fuels.