Sentences with phrase «nt claim your review»

And yes ratings arent an absolute thing they are subjective, but as long as you do nt claim your review is absolute truth there is nothing wrong with using them imo.

Not exact matches

«While the investigation did not substantiate all claims that were made, the review highlighted instances of inappropriate behavior and aspects of company culture that the Board does not condone and will not tolerate moving forward.

«Yelp has never done this and individuals making such claims are either misinformed, or more typically, have an axe to grind — whether businesses upset that Yelp will not remove reviews they don't like, or unscrupulous internet marketing «experts» trying to make a buck off of honest business owners with dubious reputation management schemes.»

During a recent review of a luxury spa client's risk and insurance programs, we found that the insurance broker had not reviewed the current experience modifier, which reflects claims experience during the past three years.

Kalanick has since hired former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to conduct a review of the sexual harassment claims, but that hasn't stopped the stream of #DeleteUber tweets.

Reviewers go back and forth about the assembly process, with some saying it's on the easy side — one reviewer says it took about one to two hours — and others claiming it's more difficult, such as this buyer whose review is entitled «not fun to assemble.»

Ehrlichman, 34, is convinced Porch can stand up to existing directory and review services like Angie's List, which claims more than two million members, not only because Porch will be free for users (Angie's List, for example, charges membership fees), but also because of the pricing information and photos users will have access to on «real projects.»

We have yet to find proof that any of these claims are accurate as we can not find any genuine testimonials or reviews.

ClickBank's role as retailer does not constitute an endorsement, approval or review of these products or any claim, statement or opinion used in promotion of these products.

We have not yet reviewed the study or vetted other claims about how and why consumers choose to obtain medicine.

And I'm certain we'll see reviews on the app stores claiming that the wallet won't work with BTC.

Letnick's acknowledgment contradicts Core Review Minister Bill Bennett's repeated claims on legislation KELOWNA — The B.C. Liberals need to withdraw Bill 24 immediately after the new agriculture minister admitted it does not have the support of the agriculture community or...

Reputable brands have been around for years, have loyal followings, don't rely on flashy marketing and claims, and have excellent reviews about the performance of their products.

Science doesn't provide proofs and any book or article that claims more than a mathematical proof would not pass peer review.

This guy is not doing scientific «studies» to show the truth of his claim and publishing them and submitting them for peer review.

Lord Carlile emphasised that the review was not to establish the truth of Carol's claims, but only to investigate the Church's handling of the case and establish best practice for handling future complaints.

August 27, 2012 at 2:31 pm Report abuse Bill T. OK, I'll play,»... they just keep running into trouble about 2012 years ago...», cite just ONE peer reviewed paper indicating that the apparent positions of stars in the sky are not calculable past the year 0 C.E. (your discussion is garbled but this appears to be your claim).

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

Well I did not finish the book because of the first 110 pages, so your review makes me think I should read the rest It was Chen claim of the Lukewarm why I stopped ready.

A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).

Thisbrief review can not refute all of Noonan's claims, but it will attempt to indicate some problems with his approach and give an example of how it fails.

Since you, like other fundiots claim that gays choose to gay, why don't you go ahead and post the citations to the peer - reviewed scientific research that supports this idea?

These grand claims and promises are, alas, not met and thus are clearly overstated given that the authors find such meager evidence of health benefits of religion in the more than 1,200 studies and 400 research reviews they examine.

First, page one features an article by Michael Smith - «Rod Sims: don't let me be misunderstood» (Australian Financial Review, 12 September 2014, pages 1 and 4) highlighting Sims» claim that the ACCC's proposed changes to s 46 have been «misinterpreted».

See, for example, Phillip Coorey and Su - Lin Tan, «ACCC boss claims Goyder doesn't get it» (Australian Financial Review, 7 August 2014) and John Durie, «Goyder a straw man, syas Sims» (The Australian, 7 August 2014)

We would review the use of any gluten - related claim not addressed in the final rule under sections 403 (a)(1) and 201 (n) of the FD&C Act.

Even though is not enough peer - reviewed science to verify these claims, we at Farmer Direct believe that not only is it important to restore ancient grains to people's diets, but that we have a responsibility to grow them using responsible farming practices in high - quality soil.

The Affinity Stroller by Britax isn't my kind of stroller but from what my sister says and what most reviews claim I can be tempted to use it any day.

I know that concern has been expressed by some that these devices have not been validated in peer - reviewed studies, and, as readers of MomsTEAM and my blog know, products which claim to actually prevent concussions or risk the severity of concussion symptoms without their claims being backed up by peer - reviewed studies ordinarily don't pass muster with me.

By submitting an Entry, each Participant (whether declared a Winner or not) agrees (and agrees to affirm such in writing) to (i) abide by and be bound by these Official Rules and the decisions of DeliciousBaby on all matters relating to this Giveaway which decisions are final and binding in all respects, (ii) waive any right to claim ambiguity in the Giveaway or these Official Rules, (iii) forever and irrevocably release, discharge, indemnify and hold harmless the Giveaway Entities, and each of their respective officers, directors, licensors, employees, representatives and agents (collectively, the «Released Parties») from any liability, claims, demands, and cause of action from personal injury, loss or damage, including death, or property damage, theft, or loss suffered or resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from participation in this Giveaway or the use, misuse or acceptance or possession of the Prize or any portion thereof, or participation in any Giveaway - related activity; (iv) grant DeliciousBaby (where permitted by law) the right to use their name on a worldwide basis, in all forms of media, in perpetuity without review or further compensation and, (v) warrant and represent that the use of the materials submitted in this Giveaway will not violate the rights of any third parties.

Someone who claims to be the mom has been active on ratings pages and left this message: «This is probably not the most ideal avenue for me to share my experience but after learning of her new office in my home town and stumbling on the article of how twisted my case became and the poor reviews years after my son's loss I can no longer stay silent.

I've walked the fields of mega-tournaments, watched countless instructional DVDs and books, appeared on television to promote new football helmets, and, over the years, have turned down the chance to promote hundreds, if not thousands, of products, many making claims that could not be backed up by peer - reviewed studies, some whose advertisements were later found to be misleading by the Federal Trade Commission.

Many of the headline health claims being made can't be substantiated, the sources they cite are not in line with health policy, graphs set out to mislead, and these adverts may also fail to meet the Government's own requirement for claims to be supported by peer — reviewed work.

I am not able to find any peer - reviewed studies reporting your claim.

For this post I received Squeeze from Munchkin for review, but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of Munchkin.

For this post I received White Hot Safety Spoons and Soft Tip Infant Spoons from Munchkin for review, but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of Munchkin.

Disclaimer: For this post I received the Woolino Merino Wool Toddler Blanket in Blue Stars for review, but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of Woolino.

For this review, I received Enfamil A + items from Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN), but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of MJN.

For this review, I received Enfamil A + products from Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN), but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of MJN.

For this post I received the Munchkin STEP ™ Diaper Pail for review, but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of Munchkin.

What I find most frustrating though is that people have been reporting these issues in reviews as long as three years ago and despite Mountain Buggy responding to one of these reviews claiming «we listen» clearly aren't!

You can not claim that induction harms babies if the scientific peer reviewed journals prove the opposite.

So this gate doesn't work the way they claim, the foot pedal is junk as other reviews stated.

For this post I received a Weighted Flexi - Straw Cup from Munchkin for review, but the opinions and claims reflected in this blog post are my own and not those of Munchkin.

Claims will not be reviewed, however, if a person reaches pension age before 6 April 2014.

MSPB does not claim to have authority to review the President's actions.

Officials at the Inspector General's office said the other reviews did not contradict the office's claims, and noted that they relied on case studies pre-selected by HUD's senior management.

Adirondack Wild, a «radical» environmental group, claims the APA's review of a new resort project in the park has not been sufficient.

«That is an extraordinary claim to make, that our journalists and our journalism would in any way not treat impartially all sides of arguments during a review of the charter,» he told the World at One.

He said the invoice showed, among other things, that the board recruited teachers and parents to make speech claims against Paladino which the board could not legally make, that Miller discussed strategy with attorneys for BPTO and NYSUT, created a model complaint and even reviewed the organizations» complaints.