He has said he didn't commit the acts he boasted of in the tape and has called his remarks just «locker room talk.»
Buddhists don't commit acts of violence for their faith, eh?
«We have the right, tight knit, progressively moral community that could
not commit these acts because of our progressive morals, so we haven't.»
Go ahead and practice whatever religion makes you happy, just don't use it as a hammer to beat people over the head, and especially don't commit acts of hatred in the name of religion and don't be a hypocrite, the lowest form of life in the universe, like Hannity, Palin, Beck and the schmucks at FOX News.
I didn't commit those acts, I don't approve of them, and I don't discriminate against members of minority groups.
So, while the corporation does
not commit acts of aggression, you are essentially forced to work for them against your will, with the ONLY other feasible choice being to not pay your debt and get thrown in jail, or starve to death.
I can cite a number of authorities, one of them Martin Luther King, who said you can
not commit an act of violence against a non-sentient object.
Once a prima facie case has been established, the respondent will have to show he did
not commit the act of which complaint is made.
The ABA Model Rules make it clear that even when you engage non-lawyers to perform functions in your practice (be it trust accounting, money management, legal research, or administrative functions), they can
not commit acts you are not permitted to commit.
If so the tribunal ha [d] to consider whether the respondent ha [d] proved that it did
not commit the act in question pursuant to s 63A (2) of the SDA 1975.»
On having considered all the evidence only then does the burden of proof shift to the respondent to prove that it has
not committed an act of unlawful discrimination.
Not exact matches
How many of you
committed an
act for which you could have been arrested -; whether you actually were or
not?
Not only is it impossible to anticipate in such a code every possible variable or potential dilemma, but always «it is possible to satisfy the letter of the law while still
committing an
act that most reasonable people would consider unethical or immoral.»
Trespass is
not a criminal offense so police will
not arrest trespassers unless they believe they are
committing or intend to
commit aggravated trespass; a further
act beyond the actual trespass intended to «deter, disrupt or obstruct» the lawful business taking place.
But rationalization
acts like a drug to dull those bad feelings, enabling us
not just to
commit fraud but to feel righteous about having done so.
Not everyone agrees on what is noble, for example, and there have been atrocious
acts of history
committed by people who sincerely believed they were
acting on a moral ideal.
Defense attorneys have already said the 21 - year - old defendant
committed all the crimes he is accused of, but they also contend Tsarnaev did so in an
act of subservience to his older brother,
not because of a personal passion.
«We do
not take decisions that impact jobs lightly, but we
committed in May to implement meaningful changes to reset our business, remove layers and find cost efficiencies, and we are
acting with a sense of urgency on that commitment,» McDonald's spokeswoman Heidi Barker Sa Shekhem said in a statement.
Under Section 55 of the Data Protection
Act (Unlawful obtaining etc. of personal data), a criminal offense has
not been
committed if a person has
acted in the reasonable belief that he had in law the right to obtain data.
The province is due to announce its next phase of climate action, but it has
not committed to
act on any of the recommendations developed by the Climate Leadership Team.
No one shall be held guilty of any penal offense on account of any
act or omission which did
not constitute a penal offense, under national or international law, at the time it was
committed.
We definitely don't all
commit 3 unethical
acts a day that rise to the level of crimes.
We should make clear that nuclear enrichment is
not acceptable inside of Iran for any purpose and, as President Bush once said, those who harbor terrorists who kill Americans will be treated in the same manner as if they had
committed the
act of terror themselves.»
Harper has
committed that our crown corporations will
not be able to serve the public interest, they will have to
act under strictly commercial considerations.
While members are still liable for fraudulent and illegal
acts they
commit, they're
not liable for LLC debts or for decisions made by company representatives.
Any person who breaches the
Act, the regulations, a term or condition of a licence, or an order or direction of the Minister, is guilty of an offence (s 7) subject to a penalty of
not more than $ 10 million (in the case of a corporation) or $ 1 million (in the case of an individual), for each day or part thereof that the offence is
committed.
Those horrible
acts committed by by athiests were
not committed in the name of athiesm, they were
not athiestic causes, whereas the Christian crusades, Islamic Jihad and even the Israeli occupation of Palistinian land have been and are openly and proudly purpotrated by the «faithful.»
@DaLe, how can you say no one
commits acts of violence in the name of their religion when there are plenty of examples of Muslims
not only shouting «Allahu Akbar» when
committing their violent
acts but also justifying those actions based on Islamic texts?
Isn't it amazing that in every country that has a sizeable Muslim population, the Muslim population
commits terrorist
acts?
And don't forget all the victims of Christianity's own Jim Jones... I'm certain you and all you Christian Extremists are in your churches, always trying to find ways to brainwash everyone into
committing suicide like Jim Jones and have plans to blow up buildings like Timothy McVeigh and think about as well as
act upon your perverted thoughts by molesting young boys... don't you?
And if Muslims
commit violent
acts afterward, the reverend should
not be blamed.
He told the court he «acknowledged» the
acts committed, but said he did
not accept criminal responsibility...
Just as I would
not expect to know every characteristic of a friend or lover or to explain every motivation for their behavior or to approve of every
act which they
commit or fail to
commit, I don't expect to know those things about God.
One khlyst prophet insisted that it was
not he, but God
acting through him, that
committed sexual improprieties.
Dear Abby hopeless Mom and wife ism, you have been bored in suburb by sexual fantasies pool boy, hooker and Abbyism, feeling guilty, by
committing Abbyism fantasy
not with husband ism against innocent of marriage, now it is time for vibrator to leave Abbyism, faithful ism and Abby adultry ism, hopeless romantic ism, be sexual fantasies pool boy and
act according to lust of American housewife boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT, free yourself from sexual fantasies pool boy, filth of genitals is, fantasy, you two martini's at noon micro bikini pizza dare and
act like slut by flaunting hot bod of massage therapist ism of One mom under boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT and bulge inequality.
«Whilst the Diocese's Child Protection Adviser said police did
not believe any criminal
act had been
committed, the Diocese nevertheless took the decision to withdraw him from ordination training.
Given the fact that god essentially has a plan for all of us, wouldn't that include those who
commit atrocious
acts?
WE SHOULD
NOT TOLERATE idiots in the world
commiting acts of Terrorism in the name of ISLAM.
The point is if somebody is thinking of
committing a criminal
act he should be arrested - but we do
not demonise the whole community.
That's an
act of betrayal First Things will
not commit.
If any of those answers are no, then you don't want God to control every violent
act committed by humans.
@colin You have a nasty habit of putting words in other peoples mouth, no one said the
acts committed were acceptable.Lot, by the very testimony of the story was
not culpable in the matter.Replied previous, but cnn put the reply on its own thread two pages ahead.Same basic response, little more information.
@colin Please do
not put words in my mouth, i nowhere said the
acts committed were acceptable, only that Lot was
not culpable, as you would have people believe.You focus on Lot as an active participant or an instigator, is a lie.
Yet while this uxorious little man consents to unsheathe himself with the rest of the audience, there is one
act when he can
not bring himself to
commit: he will
not abandon the valuables — his wallet and keys and watch — which Bertha and the other sexual nihilists are taunting him to surrender.
I think the person who
commits the
act does
not do it to be evil.
People of every race and religion have
commited horrible
acts, but as we know just because X % of group Y do bad things, does
not mean group Y is bad or wrong.
Right, just because it's in the bible and the people who
commited some of those
acts were
not only never punished but still considered Gods faithful servants, shouln't be any sort of quide on what the bible allows.
While I understand your anger, I do
not think you understand that it was
not the whole of the Catholic Church that
committed these crimes, it was men, power hungry men, that actually
acted outside of the true teachings of the religion.
That God
committed violent
acts does
not necessarily mean God, as to his character and being, is violent.
We are all guilty of sin so people need to stop
acting self righteous like they do
nt actually
commit sin anymore!