Sentences with phrase «nuclear accord as»

President Trump long has railed against the Iran nuclear accord as «insane» and the «worst ever,» even though it has successfully curbed Iran's ability to develop or build a nuclear weapon since it went into effect in early 2016.

Not exact matches

On Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani waved aside U.S. and European talks over changes to the nuclear accord and dismissed Trump as a «tradesman» who lacked the qualifications to deal with a complex international pact.

Looking ahead to 2040, China is forecast to capture more than 40 percent of the world EV market, according to a recent report from the International Energy Agency (IEA), as well as nearly 30 percent of total new wind, solar and nuclear capacity additions.

Tearing up international agreements such as the Paris Accord and the Iran nuclear deal could be disastrous, too.

As former U.S. President Barack Obama's secretary of energy, Ernest Moniz played a critical role in negotiating the nuclear deal in Iran and the Paris Climate Accord.

Oil traded near $ 68 as investors weighed the impact of a possible U.S. pull - out from the Iran nuclear deal and the potential for a historic accord between the leaders of North and South Korea.

«May could have a few surprises up its sleeve for gold traders, according to INTL FCStone, including Iranian nuclear deal as well as a close below $ 1,303.

Over the course of our conversations, I came to see Obama as a president who has grown steadily more fatalistic about the constraints on America's ability to direct global events, even as he has, late in his presidency, accumulated a set of potentially historic foreign - policy achievements — controversial, provisional achievements, to be sure, but achievements nonetheless: the opening to Cuba, the Paris climate - change accord, the Trans - Pacific Partnership trade agreement, and, of course, the Iran nuclear deal.

Ali Akbar Velayati, foreign - policy adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted by a state television website as saying Iran will not remain in the nuclear deal if the U.S. withdraws, according to Arab News.

As the actual Church in fact does not fulfill it, does not advocate concrete social demands energetically enough, does not dissociate itself radically or quickly enough from dying social forms, does not stigmatize nuclear warfare profoundly enough (all this according to the opinion of these Christians, which objectively is by no means necessarily false), they experience one disappointment after another in regard to the Church, protest against it, hurt and irritated, and turn into lay defeatists.

According to my daughter, I, as her one mother, can't compete with three moms in a nuclear family.

there are many things that can be discussed about Iran's nuclear program, as my friend Jasper talked about, that I thought are off - topic according to your question, but apparently not.

North Korea's nuclear test Sunday was widely felt in northeast China and rocked some cities for as long as eight seconds, according to reports and accounts on social media.

WASHINGTON — Congressional efforts to block President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran fizzled Thursday, as 42 Senate Democrats voted to uphold the controversial nuclear accord.

As much as 1,000 kilograms of hydrogen may have been generated at the complex this way, according to the Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety AgencAs much as 1,000 kilograms of hydrogen may have been generated at the complex this way, according to the Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agencas 1,000 kilograms of hydrogen may have been generated at the complex this way, according to the Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.

According to Paris, «The early universe is becoming such a tightly constrained environment with increasingly good measurements that we can test our descriptions of microscopic quantum physics, such as nuclear cross sections, to high accuracy.»

About 75 % of recent RAMS participants from Fisk University, an HBCU in Nashville, Tennessee, went on to graduate school in computational sciences and engineering related fields, according to Stephen Egarievwe, a computer scientist and nuclear physicist who serves as the main RAMS connection at Fisk.

Yet, the U.S. has no avowed nuclear enemies as in the days of the Soviet Union and certainly none that would require thousands of nuclear warheads to deter or destroy, according to critics of the RRW plan.

A third of these are warheads — dubbed W76 — which, since 1978, have been deployed atop submarine - based ballistic missiles or stored in what is known as the Enduring Nuclear Stockpile, according to Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Washington, D.C. - based Federation of American Scientists (FAS), an organization founded by the creators of the original nuclear weapon in 1945 that has been monitoring the nation's nuclear arsenal everNuclear Stockpile, according to Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Washington, D.C. - based Federation of American Scientists (FAS), an organization founded by the creators of the original nuclear weapon in 1945 that has been monitoring the nation's nuclear arsenal everNuclear Information Project at the Washington, D.C. - based Federation of American Scientists (FAS), an organization founded by the creators of the original nuclear weapon in 1945 that has been monitoring the nation's nuclear arsenal evernuclear weapon in 1945 that has been monitoring the nation's nuclear arsenal evernuclear arsenal ever since.

But those reactors» spent fuel pools are benefiting from a diesel generator that is still working to keep cooling water in place, according to World Nuclear News, though temperatures are beginning to rise in these pools as well.

In fact, a typical coal - fired power plant exposes local residents to as many as 18 millirems of radiation yearly, whereas a nuclear power plant emits less than six millirems per annum, according to researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Opinion: The doomsday clock still ticks (p 40) As long as opportunities and excuses for nuclear aggression persist, the world will not be safe from annihilation, according to Lawrence Krauss in an opinion piece in this month's Scientific AmericaAs long as opportunities and excuses for nuclear aggression persist, the world will not be safe from annihilation, according to Lawrence Krauss in an opinion piece in this month's Scientific Americaas opportunities and excuses for nuclear aggression persist, the world will not be safe from annihilation, according to Lawrence Krauss in an opinion piece in this month's Scientific American.

When you consider that during this 10 - year period the number of physical science job openings is projected to be about half the number of physical science degrees granted by U.S. universities, occupations such as radiation therapy (median salary $ 74,980, according to BLS) and nuclear medicine technology (median salary $ 68,560) start to seem attractive.

As the team tried to cope with that problem, a smaller piece of the unattended free end of the hose was pulled into a second water pump, according to an inspection report by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

During a drill simulating a criticality accident on June, 15, 2016, some alarms at PF - 4 didn't work, and workers showed «inattentiveness» to a colleague who pretended to be wounded, according to a Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board summary of the exercise; as a result, they were judged to have failed portions of the test.

A total of eight GNF3 lead - use assemblies have already been loaded into two nuclear plants - four each at Entergy's River Bend and Exelon's LaSalle - and are operating as designed, according to GNF.

[UPDATED, 10:50 p.m.: John P. Holdren, a Harvard physicist best known as a strong proponent of cutting greenhouse gas emissions and a specialist on energy technology policy and nuclear nonproliferation, has been chosen to be Mr. Obama's science adviser, according to two people close to Dr. Holdren and one person involved in the decision.

According to the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), between the months of July and September last year, 50 per cent of the country's electricity was produced primarily by wind and solar farms, as well as wood and nuclear power plants.

Naturally, (according to the FT, the Green party in Finland and Greenpeace in France still campaign against nuclear energy, while in Sweden the FT reports («The inconvenient truth about an oil - free society») the Greens have got the government to plan to log 1.15 mn hectares a year of its 20 mn hectares of forest for use as biofuel to reduce current dependence on oilfired energy and transport.

However, EIA also considered an alternative case (CPPNUC) that accorded all new nuclear power the same treatment as new eligible renewables in the compliance calculation.

According to Window on State Government Texas; fossils provide 85 percent of the world's energy: The rest of the percentage is provided by Uranium (Nuclear Energy) and Alternative energy sources such as solar energy, wind energy, hydro - electric energy, bio energy and geothermal energy.

Furthermore, according to «Deaths per TWh by energy source» http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html solar generation causes about 10 times as many fatalities per TWh as nuclear (excluding the fatalities from the essential back up generators).

The potential bankruptcy of a U.S. nuclear energy company could give Vladimir Putin «nuclear domination» over the industry as Russian - backed companies gobble the global market, according to pro-nuclear environmentalists.

• Kyoto Protocol • EU ETS • Australian CO2 tax and ETS • Mandating and heavily subsidising ($ / TWh delivered) renewable energy • Masses of inappropriate regulations that have inhibited the development of nuclear power, made it perhaps five times more expensive now than it should be, slowed its development, slowed its roll out, caused global CO2 emissions to be 10 % to 20 % higher now than they would otherwise have been, meaning we are on a much slower trajectory to reduce emissions than we would be and, most importantly, we are locked in to fossil fuel electricity generation that causes 10 to 100 times more fatalities per TWh than would be the case if we allowed nuclear to develop (or perhaps 1000 times according to this: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html • Making building regulations that effectively prevent people from selling, refurbishing or updating their houses if they are close to sea level (the damage to property values and to property owners» life savings is enormous as many examples in Australia are already demonstrating.

Nuclear remains the safest way to make reliable clean energy according to every major scientific review, and yet it is treated as though the opposite were the case.

According to Reuters, «The plan gives states multiple options to achieve their emission targets, such as improving power plant heat rates; using more natural gas plants to replace coal plants; ramping up zero - carbon energy, such as solar or nuclear; and increasing energy efficiency.

As of 2012, nuclear accounted for 26 percent of the total generating capacity, according to energy ministry data, though it typically accounts for about a third of power generation, while only making up about 3 - 4 percent of energy costs.

According to a report in the Observer (21/6/09) the NII evidently has had enough problems responding to the 1,767 safety incidents that occurred between 20001 - 8, about half of which were subsequently judged by inspectors as serious enough «to have had the potential to challenge a nuclear safety system».

According to the ISO, in 1990, the region saw nuclear power as the dominant generating source, at 36 %, followed by oil at 34 %, coal at 16 %, hydro at 7 %, natural gas at 6 %, and pumped storage at 1.7 %.

This feat, according to the calculator, would require a series of massive changes to how we use energy, such as a shift from fossil fuels towards nuclear and renewables, and much wider use of electric heat and transport.

«According to reports, members of the Trump administration will lend their support to an event to promote fossil fuels and nuclear power as solutions to climate change.»

According to the International Panel on Climate Change, electricity from nuclear produces one - fourth as many carbon emissions per unit of energy as solar panels.

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, nuclear energy produces four times less carbon pollution per unit of energy than solar farms, 3.4 times less than solar roofs, three times less than geothermal, and half as much as hydroelectric dams.

According to their website, SEPP also reports to cover topics such as nuclear radiation, DDT, science and regulation at EPA, energy policy, and space exploration.

According to the World Nuclear Association propaganda wing, the projected cost for Vogtle 3 & 4 is $ 14 billion, not $ 11 billion as you claim.

Questions such as how the nuclear disaster will impact Japan's fish stocks are already being asked, though fish from most areas pose no threat according to health organizations.

The biggest wave may have been as high as 49 feet, according to an investigation by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.

According to the open letter, «autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms.»