Stated opposition by Sen. Chuck Schumer to the Iran nuclear agreement doesn't go far enough, New York Republican Chairman Ed Cox said on Friday in a statement.
Not exact matches
The claims regarding Iran's activities
do not indicate violation of the 2015
nuclear agreement, but it is still likely to collapse under pressure fro the Trump administration.
With a Republican Congress backing him (most items need 60 % support to pass in the Senate), Trump will be in a position to reverse trade
agreements, immigration policies, Roe V. Wade, the Iran
nuclear deal, and any other policy the party takes issue with — including those that impact how Canadians
do business with the United States.
If the JCPOA doesn't provide enough «assurance» to the Trump administration that Iran won't develop a
nuclear weapon, there is no
agreement that could realistically be made that would ever be good enough for them.
Speaking to reporters in Saudi Arabia, Iran's main regional adversary, Pompeo said the multi-party
agreement reached in 2015 to curb Tehran's
nuclear program
did not
do enough to contain the Islamic Republic.
Perhaps the most important practical point is the need to assure the Administration of support if it
does secure
agreements on
nuclear tests and the reduction of arms.
With no
agreement in place, Britain would also lose the ability to manage
nuclear materials or aviation in the manner it
does now, along with countless other legal and regulatory relationships which currently operate under the umbrella of EU membership.
While it is possible that the United States and other members of the P5 + 1 may try to negotiate an extension, or otherwise stop Iran's
nuclear program near the expiration of the
agreement, the
agreement does not specify any such measures.
I personally believe that it is very important that we
do reach an
agreement, as long as it is enforceable and it can be properly verify and as long that there still be an option to impose deterrents, sanction-wise or otherwise by military means, if Iran chooses to break the
agreement and pursuit
nuclear weaponization.
«We applaud Senator Schumer for
doing the right thing in opposing the Iran
nuclear agreement.
So, if they don't come to a kumbaya
agreement, if it gets
nuclear, Cuomo is insulated.
Maloney said she is «concerned that, even if Iran complies with the restraints spelled out throughout the life of the
agreement, the deal
does not block Iran from eventually acquiring
nuclear weapons.»
One way to ensure that the lesson of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is not forgotten is for the world's
nuclear powers (the U.S. and U.K., Russia, France and China) and countries that have tested and / or deployed nuclear weapons (in particular, India, Israel, North Korea and Pakistan) to ratify agreements such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which the U.S. Senate also has yet
nuclear powers (the U.S. and U.K., Russia, France and China) and countries that have tested and / or deployed
nuclear weapons (in particular, India, Israel, North Korea and Pakistan) to ratify agreements such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which the U.S. Senate also has yet
nuclear weapons (in particular, India, Israel, North Korea and Pakistan) to ratify
agreements such as the Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which the U.S. Senate also has yet
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which the U.S. Senate also has yet to
do.
This Iran
nuclear agreement is a «sole executive
agreement» because it
does not require Congressional action to be implemented.
The Iran
Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 (the «Corker bill»), passed by Congress in May 2015, also confirms that «It is the sense of Congress that: -LSB-...] this Act does not require a vote by Congress for the agreement to commenc
Agreement Review Act of 2015 (the «Corker bill»), passed by Congress in May 2015, also confirms that «It is the sense of Congress that: -LSB-...] this Act
does not require a vote by Congress for the
agreement to commenc
agreement to commence;»
It's a
done deal, yet opponents of the Iran
nuclear agreement won't go quietly.