Not exact matches
Energy Secretary Rick Perry commissioned the study in April to evaluate whether «regulatory burdens» imposed by past administrations — including that of President Barack Obama — had forced the premature retirement of
baseload power plants that provide nonstop
power, like those fired by coal and
nuclear fuel.
In April 2014 the government released its first post-Fukushima strategic energy plan, which called for keeping some
nuclear plants as
baseload power sources — stations that run consistently around the clock.
Wavering solar and wind
power don't play well with
baseload nuclear plants that prefer to run at full blast, so the French must find a way to cope with this imbalance if they are to meet the European Union's directive to generate 20 percent of their electricity from renewables by 2020.
And yes central
power will be another piece (
nuclear is great for
baseload power... it operates at 90 % capacity factors even if the price of building a new
plant has risen by 130 % since 2000) Centralized wind and solar will mature but then there's the transmission issue...
Our seas will need to have tens of thousands to these wind turbines deployed at several per week to do the job in time and only shallow offshore is viable at the present time and that is inline with existing
baseload fossil fuel coal and gas fired
power plants along with existing
nuclear ones to.
In the two years since the
nuclear moratorium, the nation has urgently needed new
baseload power plants to shoulder the country's annual peak load of 80 GW.
Today, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's government, which had promised a «rethink» of Japan's post-Fukushima pledge to close all of the country's
nuclear power plants, released a draft of a new energy plan which calls
nuclear power an «important
baseload electricity source» for the country, though it's vague on how big of a role
nuclear will play in the country's energy load in the future.
But at a hearing at the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on January 23 in which much of the discussion was centered around how
power reliability fared during the recent record - breaking cold weather event in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, a number of key stakeholders noted that
nuclear was as vital as other
baseload plants in maintaining reliability.
Nuclear power plants such as SONGS are important sources of
baseload electricity because of their high output capability and low variable operating costs.
I suggest, there is no need for ramping - capable
nuclear power plants until
nuclear capacity is sufficient to supply most of
baseload — as is the case in France.
Renewable energy opponents love to highlight the variability of the sun and wind as a way of bolstering support for coal, gas, and
nuclear plants, which can more easily operate on - demand or provide «
baseload» (continuous)
power.
It seems likely to me that, within 100 years,
Nuclear fusion
plants will be a viable source of
baseload power.
These wholesale markets are rigged in favor of wind and solar and they are forcing
baseload power generation, specifically,
nuclear and coal - fired
plants, to close.
4th generation
nuclear power (4th GNP) and coal - fired
power plants with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) at present are the best candidates to provide large
baseload nearly carbon - free
power (in case renewable energies can not do the entire job).
Some of these
plants, often
nuclear plants, are kept running continuously to meet «
baseload» demand i.e. the minimum level of demand, while other
plants are kept ready to ramp up to full
power to meet the daily peaks in demand.
Nuclear power is often seen as attractive because it can offer
baseload power without carbon dioxide emissions that come from fossil - fuel natural gas and coal
power plants.
Back in April, DOE Secretary Perry issued a memo calling for a reliability study of U.S.
power systems, expressing concerns that competitive markets, renewables, and regulations were forcing retirement of
baseload (i.e. coal and
nuclear)
power plants critical to reliability.
Wavering solar and wind
power don't play well with
baseload nuclear plants that prefer to run at full blast, so the French must find a way to cope with this imbalance if they are to meet the European Union's directive to generate 20 percent of their electricity from renewables by 2020.
They added that subsidy - free renewables will have a negative impact on
baseload power generation, such as natural gas and
nuclear, but boost the business case for flexible assets, such as peaking
plants, battery storage and demand response.
Power variability from renewables could be addressed through storage, hydro, larger power networks, existing nuclear baseload, and lastly through existing natural gas pl
Power variability from renewables could be addressed through storage, hydro, larger
power networks, existing nuclear baseload, and lastly through existing natural gas pl
power networks, existing
nuclear baseload, and lastly through existing natural gas
plants.
Perhaps IFR supporters should be pushing them as
nuclear waste disposal
plants that have the added benefit of generating
baseload power!
For years the utilities have depended on rising capacity factors of
nuclear and coal
plants and
power uprates for
nuclear plants to keep up with the
baseload demand.
It might even be argued that variable wind
power is no more of a problem than inflexible «
baseload» generators such as coal - fired
plants and
nuclear, which maintain a relatively steady output regardless of demand, and regardless of output from renewable
plants.
In a Friday memo, Perry asked his chief of staff to undertake a 60 day inquiry into «the extent to which continued regulatory burdens, as well as mandates and tax and subsidy policies, are responsible for forcing the premature retirement of
baseload power plants,» such as those fueled by coal or
nuclear energy, among other grid related questions.
... The Market for Electricity is Rigged... The preferential dispatch system used by many RTO / ISO grid operators favors wind and solar to the exclusion of critical
baseload power from fossil fuel and
nuclear power plants.
At the federal level, Energy Secretary Rick Perry proposed a rule to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to compensate
baseload power plants that keep at least 90 days worth of fuel on - site — basically all
nuclear power plants and some coal
plants.
CCS has not yet been commercially deployed at any centralized
power plant; the existing
nuclear industry, based on reactor designs more than a half - century old and facing renewed public concerns of safety, is in a period of retrenchment, not expansion; and existing solar, wind, biomass, and energy storage systems are not yet mature enough to provide affordable
baseload power at terawatt scale.