Sentences with phrase «nuclear deal if»

Iran warned Thursday it will quit a landmark nuclear deal if President Donald Trump pulls the United States out of the accord, while also criticising European states over «concessions» to the Americans.

Ali Akbar Velayati, foreign - policy adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted by a state television website as saying Iran will not remain in the nuclear deal if the U.S. withdraws, according to Arab News.

Not exact matches

Iran has said it will ramp up its nuclear program if the deal collapses and a senior Iranian official said on Tuesday that Tehran might...

We still have all the different soundbites on Iran and the May 12 deadline is coming up,» Petromatrix strategist Olivier Jakob said, referring to an upcoming date by which the United States has said it will withdraw from a nuclear deal with Iran if the other signatories to the deal do not meet certain conditions.

The Russian veto was a defeat for the United States, which has been lobbying for months for Iran to be held accountable at the United Nations, while at the same time threatening to quit a 2015 deal among world powers to curb Iran's nuclear program if «disastrous flaws» are not fixed.

The deal is already favourable to the French: the agreed - on strike price for Hinkley C's electricity — around $ 150 per megawatt hour — is double current energy rates and could increase further if another U.K. nuclear plant currently on the drawing board is not built.

The rial has lost almost half its value since September, partly due to fears of a return of economic sanctions if U.S. President Donald Trump carries out his threat to exit a nuclear deal with Tehran.

Iran has said it will ramp up its nuclear program if the deal collapses and a senior Iranian official said on Tuesday that Tehran might quit a treaty designed to stop the spread of nuclear weapons if Trump scraps the agreement.

If it keeps up and if the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal becomes a reality, WTI oil prices will head higher, upwards of $ 70 - pluIf it keeps up and if the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal becomes a reality, WTI oil prices will head higher, upwards of $ 70 - pluif the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal becomes a reality, WTI oil prices will head higher, upwards of $ 70 - plus.

* U.S. President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron pledged on Tuesday to seek stronger measures to contain Iran but Trump refrained from committing to staying in a 2015 nuclear deal and threatened Tehran with retaliation if it restarted its nuclear program.

Toshiba needs to sell the chip unit to plug a giant hole in its finances caused by the failure of the conglomerate's U.S. nuclear business, but the deal has snagged on such issues as antitrust concerns if the U.S. disk - drive maker were a major owner.

President Trump will leave the Iran nuclear deal next month if there are no significant changes, Sen. Bob Corker says.

First, if the EU acquiesces on the nuclear deal, Trump will move on to target another agreement, and then another, and then another, until the very foundation of the current international order is uprooted.

On a final note, if you've been paying attention to the news, you're probably familiar with the pending nuclear deal with Iran.

A deal on Iran's nuclear program could be reached this week if the U.S. and...

If Trump blesses the Iran deal, Iran will march ever closer toward the soon - to - be inevitable prospect of nuclear power.

WASHINGTON — If Congress and America's European allies are unable to amend the Iran nuclear deal, US President Donald Trump is prepared to «potentially» walk away from it, the White House said on Monday.

Related: What Happens If Trump Trashes The Iran Nuclear Deal?

European powers still want to hand Trump a plan to save the Iran nuclear deal next week, but they have also started work on protecting EU - Iranian business ties if the US president makes good on a threat to withdraw, six sources told Reuters.

«While oil could appreciate further if the U.S. withdraws from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, gains are likely to remain limited by robust production from U.S. shale,» he wrote.

US President Donald Trump previously issued a final warning that Washington would walk away from the nuclear deal and reimpose sanctions by 12 May if new restrictions are not placed on Iran's nuclear and missile programmes.

If our concern is peacemaking — particularly the special urgency given that task by the nuclear threat — then we shall have to come to grips with those portions of the biblical witness in which the community of faith has been forced to deal with the violence and pain of conflict between peoples.

However, since Europe will want to save the nuclear deal and these US sanctions stand in the way, the EU may impose sanctions on your company if you were to comply with US sanctions.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the United States will need to «provide security assurances» to North Korea's Kim Jong Un if the adversaries are to reach a nuclear deal.

There is however interesting long term perspective - what if nuclear deal is followed and sanctions lifted... In spite of all hostile rhetoric on both sides, some moderate thawing would be quite possible.

«If we reject this deal, we do not have a viable alternative for preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.»

Exelon Corp., the owner of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, is in talks to buy and continue operating the adjacent FitzPatrick plant, which will shut down six months from now if the deal fails.

The deal to provide a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point would have cost even more if George Osborne had had his way, the former energy secretary Ed Davey has said.

«As if the billions of dollars of consumer money gifted in subsidies to the nuclear industry weren't enough, now we find out that another $ 700 million in public assets will be handed to Exelon in order to sweeten the deal for their purchase of FitzPatrick.»

Maloney said she is «concerned that, even if Iran complies with the restraints spelled out throughout the life of the agreement, the deal does not block Iran from eventually acquiring nuclear weapons.»

However, in the nuclear DNA markers there were no such differences, which would be near to impossible if we were dealing with different species,» says Ritter.

On SCG, per CEO they would only go forward if the state lets them recover the cost of failed SCG Nuclear plant, otherwise no deal.

But if its aesthetic deals with subject matter that is «tragic and timeless,» that subject matter was unique to its times — the holocaust, threat of nuclear annihilation, the subsequent search for meaning.

I often hear nuclear advocates proclaiming that «nuclear is THE solution to global warming» and that «no one can be serious about dealing with global warming if they don't support expanded use of nuclear power» but I have never heard any nuclear advocate lay out a plan showing how many nuclear power plants would have to be built in what period of time to have a significant impact on GHG emissions.

Current technology includes nuclear fission, which is more than capable of dealing with global energy needs, and at costs lower than fossil — IF it were only deployed.

The coming expansion of nuclear power can be a security as well as an environmental blessing (after all, nuclear energy is entirely free of greenhouse gas emissions and can help us deal with climate change), but only if it comes without a great increase in the risk of the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

More significant perhaps is the legacy of nuclear power for future generations, particularly if the worst case scenarios of anthropogenic climate change play out, where society will be vulnerable and incohesive and possibly less able to cope with the technical challenge of maintaining or decomissioning elderly nuclear power stations or dealing with the build up of waste.

But he wholly fails to explain what the implications of the variability problem is (the need for overbuild of generation capacity and expensive / unfeasible large - scale energy storage), nor whether, if an effort is made to deal practically with these problems in real national electricity grids, the «increasingly cheaper» renewables will ever become cheap enough (when all relevant real - world factors are considered) and reliable enough (without natural gas «backup»), to actually substitute for and displace fossil fuels (or nuclear) at the scale required.

Iran has millions of barrels of oil that they would absolutely love to dump on the world market — even if it depresses the price, it's still hard currency for them and something of a return to normal international trading in light of the nuclear deal which allowed them to have some sanctions removed.