* US shouldn't ditch Iran
nuclear deal without new accord - Macron.
Not exact matches
He also made no promises about whether his boss would stick to a 2015 accord to stop Iran developing a
nuclear bomb, warning instead that Trump was still likely to pull out
without major changes to a
deal that Europeans insist can not be reopened.
When the votes were counted, the Jamesport
nuclear project,
without the first shovel in the ground, was
dealt a resounding defeat.
The challenge has been to block these pathways
without shuttering a single
nuclear facility, because Iran has insisted that closures were a
deal - breaker.
Earlier titles or spinoffs like Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker
dealt with the ethics of
nuclear deterrence — or more specifically, whether
nuclear deterrence could work
without a human element to guide it (the debate being that, a human could always make the decision not to retaliate to a
nuclear strike, out of fear of completely wiping out the human race, as opposed to an A.I., that would retaliate regardless).
The coming expansion of
nuclear power can be a security as well as an environmental blessing (after all,
nuclear energy is entirely free of greenhouse gas emissions and can help us
deal with climate change), but only if it comes
without a great increase in the risk of the proliferation of
nuclear weapons.
But he wholly fails to explain what the implications of the variability problem is (the need for overbuild of generation capacity and expensive / unfeasible large - scale energy storage), nor whether, if an effort is made to
deal practically with these problems in real national electricity grids, the «increasingly cheaper» renewables will ever become cheap enough (when all relevant real - world factors are considered) and reliable enough (
without natural gas «backup»), to actually substitute for and displace fossil fuels (or
nuclear) at the scale required.