Sentences with phrase «nuclear deterrence»

"Nuclear deterrence" refers to the strategy of preventing a nuclear attack by threatening to retaliate with nuclear weapons. It is based on the belief that the risk of severe consequences would discourage any potential attacker from initiating a nuclear strike. The idea is to create a balance of power and ensure peace by making adversaries think twice before using such weapons. Full definition
And with every known military option — from launching Tomahawk cruise missiles to airstrikes — North Korea is likely to interpret any strike, however limited, «as a prelude to invading or overthrowing the government, even if the United States insists otherwise,» The Atlantic reported, citing Daryl Press, a scholar of nuclear deterrence at Dartmouth College.
They want us to moderate our reliance on nuclear deterrence without either denying its lamentable necessity or pretending its morality.
• $ 10.24 billion for Weapons Activities — $ 921 million above the fiscal year 2017 enacted level — to maintain a strong nuclear deterrence posture;
It seems increasingly evident that the security promised by nuclear deterrence is illusory.
PULLMAN, Wash. — A national defense official will speak about the policies and cutting edge science that drive the U.S. nuclear deterrence program at 2 p.m. Friday, April 17, in Smith CUE 518 at Washington State University.
Working with poet Stanley Fisher, they organized three exhibitions: the Vulgar Show (November 1960), which announced the March Group's intolerance for the business of art; the Involvement Show (April 1961), which mounted a wholesale condemnation of the perceived hypocrisies in American foreign policy; and the Doom Show (November 1961), which critiqued nuclear deterrence policies of the Kennedy administration.
«The main attribute of the MOAB is that it causes overpressure,» Adam Lowther, the director of the US Air Force's School of Advanced Nuclear Deterrence Studies, told Business Insider reporter Alex Lockie.
Today, living with nuclear deterrence is the greatest tragedy in the world, only excepting what might result from its alternatives.
Nuclear deterrence obscures this task, for it is unusable.
Such a change may well go with a shift in emphasis from all - out nuclear deterrence to reliance on limited military methods and with a shift away from preoccupation with the military to a search for political and economic alternatives to communism.
Among these reforms included the creation of a permanent NATO Nuclear Planning Group to foster cooperation and reassurance about nuclear deterrence; the realignment of NATO military headquarters and mechanisms for political consultation among the allies; and a wholesale change in NATO strategy away from 1950s «massive retaliation» toward a version of «flexible response» that enjoys some currency even today.
The concept of nuclear deterrence follows the rationale of the «first user» principle: states reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in self - defence against an armed attack threatening their vital security interests.
James Doyle's dismissal after an article criticizing nuclear deterrence now in hands of inspector general
U.S. Major General William A. Chambers came in to our offices today to talk about how things are going with the nation's nuclear deterrence efforts.
This is to say nothing about the antithetical implications of Skull Face's character in relation to Venom, specifically regarding nuclear deterrence.
[125] The Economist, the New Statesman, and many left - wing newspapers supported the reliance on nuclear deterrence and nuclear weapons, but in their view considered that of the United States would suffice, and that of the costs of the «nuclear umbrella» was best left to be borne by the United States alone.
This funding will uphold the nation's nuclear deterrence posture, maintain the safety and readiness of our weapons stockpile, and allow the U.S. to meet any nuclear threat.
What does nuclear deterrence have in common with (1) pacifist idealism, (2) the modern notion that warfare must be total, and (3) romanticism's vision of history?
Congress established the NNSA in 2000 to enhance the safety, security, reliability and performance of the U.S nuclear weapon stockpile to provide a credible U.S. nuclear deterrence.
The US, which adheres to a policy of nuclear deterrence, has criticized the nuclear - weapons ban, but Mattis» letter is seen as an unusual step in bilateral relations, particularly between the US and Sweden.
(undated), which delegitimates the concept of nuclear deterrence.
By refusing to admit the metaphor of governor into his discussion, Meeks relieves himself of the obligation even to consider seriously this line of argument and the attendant possibility that some form of nuclear deterrence might be acknowledged as a morally acceptable lesser evil.
By no means does the metaphor of governor lead inexorably to an endorsement of workfare (or of nuclear deterrence).
When it comes to nuclear deterrence, some Protestants do not consider subtle judgment to be a virtue.
They concede that even their conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence may reinforce a policy of arms buildup, and they know that historically deterrence has not «set in motion substantial processes of disarmament.»
Nuclear deterrence, as the strategic doctrine which has justified nuclear weapons in the name of security and war prevention, must now be categorically rejected as contrary to our faith in Jesus Christ who is our life and peace.
Nuclear deterrence is morally unacceptable because it relies on the credibility of the intention to use nuclear weapons: we believe that any intention to use weapons of mass destruction is an utterly inhuman violation of the mind and spirit of Christ which should be in us... [David Gill, editor, Gathered for Life (Eerdmans, l984), p. 75].
And he understood, better than many churchmen but in harmony with the thinking of John Paul II, that the key to resolving the dangers posed by the nuclear deterrence system, in which the United States and the Soviet Union both had the capacity to «bounce the rubble,» was the collapse of the communist project and dramatic change in the governance of what was then the USSR.
These seemingly disparate streams of influence culminate, O'Donovan contends, in the doctrine of nuclear deterrence.
But we fail to realize that nuclear deterrence is a freak doctrine that has put an end to what was once called national defense.
I shall deal briefly with three areas: (1) The role of nationalism in the emerging nations; (2) The present conflict of ideologies; and (3) The dilemma of nuclear deterrence.
(3) The dilemma of nuclear deterrence.
That is part of what happened years ago when the NCCB issued a long pastoral letter on economic justice, and another on the morality of nuclear deterrence.
At a more general level, the international system is returning to great power security competition, now that multipolarity is replacing the post-Cold War unipolar moment, and how that future will turn out is uncertain — but one thing that the last 67 years have shown is that nuclear deterrence is a fairly effective way of stopping major power security tension turning into all - out conventional war.
[114] General Richard Shirreff criticised SNP proposals for defence and questioned whether other NATO members would accept an independent Scotland that rejected the principle of nuclear deterrence.
Among these institutional shortcomings was a failure to grapple with the eroding credibility of nuclear deterrence.
Although the UK's nuclear arsenal guaranteed its continued global influence in the Cold War, it was the nuclear deterrence developed between the USA and the USSR - the belief that any attack would lead to massive nuclear retaliation and «mutually assured destruction» - that maintained the temperature between the 1950s and 1990s.
On BBC Question Time, we've had everything from John McDonnell's non-apology apology for IRA comments to Chris Bryant's self - depreciating «aww shucks» routine when Labour is reduced to mirth; from Stephen Kinnock's failure to make anything straight from the crooked timber of Labour on the nuclear deterrence to Lisa Nandy's struggle to disassociate Labour with violence at the Conservative Party conference.
«National security is our number - one priority, and this bill will fund essential programs that maintain our nuclear deterrence posture in the face of growing global threats — including North Korea and other countries that are testing the tolerance of the international community,» House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen said.
The chief mission of NIF is to provide experimental insight and data for NNSA's science - based Stockpile Stewardship Program in the area of high - energy - density physics, a scientific field of direct relevance to nuclear deterrence and national nuclear security.
The research supports the Laboratory's Nuclear Deterrence and Energy Security mission areas and the Nuclear and Particle Futures science pillar.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z