Defence minister Lord Drayson has insisted that «no decisions have yet been taken» on the future of Britain's
nuclear deterrent system.
The decision about replacing the Trident
nuclear deterrent system will be taken with «proper respect» for parliament, Jack Straw has insisted.
Not exact matches
Nuclear weapons, they claim, are not weapons at all but «
deterrents» — implements of a
system of rational and responsible statecraft beyond the empire of law.
From 1994 the Royal Navy's Vanguard - class submarines, equipped with the Trident weapons
system, succeeded the Polaris missile boats which had maintained a continuous strategic
nuclear deterrent for the United Kingdom for almost 30 years.
Labour's support for maintaining a
nuclear deterrent that is constantly at sea - in other words, a submarine
system similar to Trident rather than pared - down version - was passed by the party's National Policy Forum without opposition and will remain in the manifesto.
The Tories support the decision to renew Britain's submarine - based
nuclear deterrent, based on the Trident missile
system.
Mr Ainsworth claimed the party's policy of saying no to a like - for - like replacement of the
nuclear missile
system would leave Britain with a «cheap and ineffective»
deterrent.
That's why, when more and more countries have or want
nuclear weapons, we will always keep our ultimate insurance policy, we will renew our
nuclear deterrent based on the Trident missile
system.
Britain's current
nuclear deterrent, the Trident
system, is nearing the end of its lifespan and the govermment will soon have to decide how, and if, to replace it.
Theresa May has warned that ditching Britain's
nuclear deterrent would be a «reckless gamble», as MPs prepare to vote on the Trident missile
system.
Keeping the Trident
nuclear weapons
system would act as an effective
deterrent in preventing threats to UK security, Sir Menzies Campbell has said.