Fossil fuel and
nuclear electric generating units are generally built for many years of operation and are very expensive to replace or modify.
Not exact matches
Thanks to our
nuclear power plants, greenhouse gas emissions from New York's
electric generating plants are just one fourth (per capita) of what is produced on average across the U. S.
People in Texas will plug in
electric vehicles to their wind - powered grid, while Northeasterners might rely on
nuclear -
generated electricity.
Operating
nuclear power reactors have a
generating capacity of more than 380,000 megawatts of
electric power.
In an emergency, unlike today's reactors, it shuts down without human intervention and without requiring
electric power... Hundreds of
nuclear scientists believe this technology has the ability to
generate carbon - free power at a cost per kW less than coal.»
See,
electric relies on energy
generated by burning coal and
nuclear energy in most parts of the world.
If / when oil gets over $ 100 / barrel and stays there, a combination of coal,
nuclear, solar and wind will be used to
generate electricity, and
electric cars will become more common.
Out of its total 35,843 MW of
electric generating capacity in 2005 (3.36 % of the U.S. total), AEP gets 69.0 % from coal, 22.2 % from natural gas, 6.4 % from
nuclear, and 2.3 % from hydroelectricity.
Of the country's 6,000 coal, oil, natural gas,
nuclear, wind, and solar
electric -
generating facilities, a small sub-group of mostly coal - fired power generators produces more than its share of the nation's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared with the electricity it produces, the report found.
Earlier in January, California regulators approved Pacific Gas &
Electric's application to retire the Diablo Canyon plant by 2025, following a protracted battle over the
generating station that pitted local economic interests against environmentalists and other opponents of
nuclear power.
Lobbyists crowded into a committee room at the General Assembly to watch the inevitable advance Tuesday of a bill that sponsors say would simultaneously lower
electric rates and stabilize profits
generated by the Millstone
Nuclear Power Station.
China News: Adding many
nuclear power plants will greatly help pollution from far dirtier
electric generating plants.
Out of its total 13,041 MW of
electric generating capacity in 2005 (1.22 % of the U.S. total), DTE Energy produces 61.3 % from coal, 16.4 % from natural gas, 11.7 % from oil, 9.3 % from
nuclear, and 0.2 % from biomass.
(Sec. 242) Requires the Secretary to establish a program to make monetary awards to encourage the owners and operators of new and existing
electric energy generation facilities or thermal energy production facilities using fossil or
nuclear fuel to use innovative means of recovering thermal energy that is a potentially useful byproduct of
electric power generation or other processes to: (1)
generate additional
electric energy; or (2) make sales of thermal energy not used for
electric generation, in the form of steam, hot water, chilled water, or desiccant regeneration, or for other commercially valid purposes.
A veteran of the U.S. Submarine Service (one hitch) and a degreed Electrical Engineer (U.T. Knoxville — 1968 — three peer - reviewed IEEE papers published), I spent most of my career designing, building and commissioning
electric power
generating plants including hydro, pumped storage, coal fired, natural gas,
nuclear (both PWR and BWR), geothermal, wood - waste, and landfill gas.
Existing U.S.
nuclear power
generating plants operate under increasingly competitive market conditions brought on by relatively low natural gas prices, increasing electricity generation from renewable energy sources, and limited growth in
electric power demand.
While many
electric utilities have built their capital intensive infrastructure around the availability of fossil energy to drive their generators, utilities have had the choice to lead the transition to a zero net emissions energy system via the use of renewable and
nuclear energy to
generate electricity.
The senate bill being considered — SF 3504 — is titled: «Carbon reduction facility designation for certain
nuclear energy
electric generating facilities.»
Worldwide,
nuclear power generation actually declined in 2008 while wind
electric generating capacity increased by 27,000 megawatts, enough to supply 8 million American homes.
Sixty - one percent of Canada's
electric power is
generated from hydro, 26 percent from thermal and 12 percent from
nuclear energy sources.
The fact is that over the last five years, wind power has added more new
electric generating capacity in the USA than coal and
nuclear combined — in spite of the fact that both coal and
nuclear have enjoyed large, and permanent public subsidies, while subsidies for wind have been small, short - term and therefore unreliable.
Solar power,
nuclear energy, and coal are primarily useful for
generating electric power, but these energies do not provide liquid fuels needed for transportation or mechanized agriculture, nor do they provide raw materials for manufacturing of 300,000 products, including fertilizer.
I was assisted by David MacKay who reviewed a short study for my group on the economics of synthesising liquid fuel using
nuclear power, atmospheric carbon dioxide and water vapour versus charging
electric cars using the same
nuclear generated electricity.
Out of its total 28,019 MW of
electric generating capacity in 2005 (2.63 % of the U.S. total), Progress Energy produced 39.2 % from natural gas, 28.3 % from coal, 15.9 % from oil, 15.7 % from
nuclear, and 0.8 % from hydroelectricity.
Electric cars do seem to be near practicality, and they can be «green» if their batteries are recharged using green power (not fossil - fuel or
nuclear generated power).