Not exact matches
The problem here was that at the time, not only did the US not want Iran to do any
fuel cycle work, the US also opposed any
nuclear energy
program in Iran.
Some of the new
nuclear science research
programs, including the one at MIT, are studying new reactor designs and
fuel cycles that scientists (and policy - makers) hope will make
nuclear plants safer and cheaper to operate, and produce waste materials with smaller volume, shorter half - lives, and less appeal to terrorists and other would - be
nuclear powers.
The proposed cuts include $ 269.78 billion from energy
programs, including $ 158.7 billion of fossil
fuel subsidies; $ 167.09 billion of agricultural subsidies, including $ 89.82 billion of federal crop insurance disaster aid; $ 212.02 billion of transportation subsidies, including $ 125.80 billion of general revenue transfers to the Highway Trust Fund; $ 101.8 billion of federal flood, crop and
nuclear insurance subsidies; and $ 24.99 billion from wasteful or environmental damaging public lands and water projects.
To date, the federal government has spent more than $ 7 billion compensating people made sick by the government - run
nuclear program that
fueled the Manhattan Project and the Cold War arms race.
Salehi claims their deaths emboldened, rather than deterred, Iran's
nuclear establishment, and insists that Iran's enrichment
program was intended only to produce
fuel for civilian power reactors.
Rich in fossil -
fuel resources, Iran is pursuing a
nuclear power
program difficult to understand in the absence of military motives
For the first time in decades a new uranium rod fabrication plant is operating in New Mexico and it may soon be joined by as many as three others in the U.S.. That's because 2013 will see the expiration of an agreement with Russia that allows the U.S. to blend down the highly enriched uranium from decommissioned Russian
nuclear warheads into the lower level enriched
fuel used in U.S.
nuclear reactors — a
program known as «Megatons to Megawatts» that currently provides as much as 50 percent of U.S.
nuclear fuel.
Finally, the global expansion of
nuclear power plants should be enabled by some form of leasing
program for the uranium
fuel rods — one up for renewal every decade or so.
The plan boosts funding, however, for the Generation IV
program that supports multinational research and development for next - generation reactors and also would increase funding for
fuel - cycle research and development within DoE's
nuclear energy office.
Ian Poll, professor of aerospace engineering at the Cranfield University in England, in a recent lecture covered by the Times of London called for a «big research
program to help the aviation industry convert from fossil
fuels to
nuclear energy.»
A
program to build commercial
nuclear power is gathering steam, thanks in part to a deal brokered by the U.S. to give India access to Western technology and
fuel.
From 1990 to the formation of NEI in 1994 he was the Vice President of Technical
Programs at the U.S. Council for Energy Awareness (USCEA) where he was responsible for ensuring the technical accuracy and effectiveness of USCEA's industry communications and also led the regulatory, policy and R&D activities associated with supporting companies in the front - end of the
nuclear fuel cycle.
NAC is the DOE contractor for the supply of spent
nuclear fuel packaging and transportation services under the FRR
program for Other Than High Income countries.
The many serious technical deficiencies of the Yucca Mountain site and DOE's flawed approach to geologic disposal notwithstanding, the most potentially explosive aspect of the federal
program is the reality that tens of thousands of shipments of deadly spent
nuclear fuel and high - level radioactive waste will travel the nation's highways and railroads - through 43 states and thousands of communities, day after day for upwards of 40 years.
Over the years, Ms. Eisenhower has served as a member of three blue ribbon commissions for the Department of Energy for three different secretaries: The Baker - Cutler Commission on U.S. Funded Non-Proliferation
Programs in Russia; The Sununu - Meserve Commission on
Nuclear Energy; and the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive program for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the winter o
Nuclear Energy; and the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's
Nuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive program for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the winter o
Nuclear Future, which released its findings on a comprehensive
program for the back end of the
nuclear fuel cycle in the winter o
nuclear fuel cycle in the winter of 2012.
Today, IFE - Halden has a unique competence in instrumentation used for on - line monitoring of
nuclear fuel and material behavior; specially customized instrumentation solutions; and a highly developed
program on Generation IV instruments.
It could also make use of other materials the UK Government wishes to disposition including reprocessed uranium and unused
fuel from past
nuclear reactor
programs.
Virtually the entire U.S.
nuclear reactor fleet participated in this
program by using
fuel fabricated with low enriched uranium from the Megatons to Megawatts
program.
As part of its
nuclear fuel recycling
program, Japan has been pushing its pluthermal plan that involves mixing plutonium with uranium to produce plutonium - uranium mixed oxide (MOX)
fuel.
«For
nuclear power to remain a sustainable energy source, an economically viable and secure source of
nuclear fuel must be available,» said Phillip Britt, who provides technical and outreach leadership for the DOE
program.
Back in the 1970s and 1980s, that wasn't a problem, because the nation's
nuclear weapons
program could double as a
fuel source for the space
program.
Why it matters: By facilitating the writing of computational software and providing a «shared - memory»
programming interface that greatly simplifies the development of
programs for unconventional architectures on distributed - memory computers, the GA helps scientists conducting scientific studies on alternative
fuels,
nuclear safety, and environmental remediation.
We need to do a «full court press» to switch from fossil
fuels and
nuclear (which also releases heat into water on a large scale, and supports
nuclear military
programs), using existing and near - commercialization battery, solar and wind technology, and design systems to cost - effectively convert the existing 600 - million - plus vehicle fleet rather than waiting for replacement.
All countries, including Canada, must shift support from big, centralised and polluting energy sources, such as fossil
fuels and
nuclear power, to renewable energies, conservation and energy efficiency
programs.
But it offers no viable solutions to the raft of problems plaguing
nuclear power, such as the erosion of public trust in this energy source in the aftermath of the 2011 Fukushima
nuclear disaster, difficulties over the disposal of radioactive waste and the problem - plagued
nuclear fuel recycling
program.
(Sec. 242) Requires the Secretary to establish a
program to make monetary awards to encourage the owners and operators of new and existing electric energy generation facilities or thermal energy production facilities using fossil or
nuclear fuel to use innovative means of recovering thermal energy that is a potentially useful byproduct of electric power generation or other processes to: (1) generate additional electric energy; or (2) make sales of thermal energy not used for electric generation, in the form of steam, hot water, chilled water, or desiccant regeneration, or for other commercially valid purposes.
In that post you seem to lose track of the main point of the thread: if the goal is to rapidly replace fossil
fuel use with CO2 - free generating technology that is known to work reliably at known costs, then a strong
nuclear program is the best option.
With a new federal
nuclear waste
program necessary and on the long - term horizon, the Natural Resources Defense Council sought to learn what state officials think should be done with the spent
fuel and radioactive waste from America's 99 commercial
nuclear reactors.
Without the federal government capping
nuclear industry liability (i.e. Price Anderson Act), signing contracts to take custody and dispose of spent nuclear fuel (i.e. Nuclear Waste Policy Act), bankrolling civilian and military atomic research and development for light water and breeder reactors (i.e. Atomic Energy Act), and other programs, the industry would not
nuclear industry liability (i.e. Price Anderson Act), signing contracts to take custody and dispose of spent
nuclear fuel (i.e. Nuclear Waste Policy Act), bankrolling civilian and military atomic research and development for light water and breeder reactors (i.e. Atomic Energy Act), and other programs, the industry would not
nuclear fuel (i.e.
Nuclear Waste Policy Act), bankrolling civilian and military atomic research and development for light water and breeder reactors (i.e. Atomic Energy Act), and other programs, the industry would not
Nuclear Waste Policy Act), bankrolling civilian and military atomic research and development for light water and breeder reactors (i.e. Atomic Energy Act), and other
programs, the industry would not exist.
CLIMATE SCIENCE & POLICY WATCH is the flagship
program of the Government Accountability Project's Environment & Energy Program, covering safety and health issues in the fossil fuel and nuclear power industries, clean air and water, land use, and
program of the Government Accountability Project's Environment & Energy
Program, covering safety and health issues in the fossil fuel and nuclear power industries, clean air and water, land use, and
Program, covering safety and health issues in the fossil
fuel and
nuclear power industries, clean air and water, land use, and toxics.
Via:: McClatchy News Bureau, «Clinton, Obama urge Senate to shut door on
nuclear waste site» and Science Daily, «Options For Dealing With Spent Nuclear Fuel, National Research Council Report» Image credit:: Mineral County Yucca Mountain Oversight
nuclear waste site» and Science Daily, «Options For Dealing With Spent
Nuclear Fuel, National Research Council Report» Image credit:: Mineral County Yucca Mountain Oversight
Nuclear Fuel, National Research Council Report» Image credit:: Mineral County Yucca Mountain Oversight
Program