In comparison to renewable or
nuclear generation options, however, it is rarely more expensive.
Not exact matches
«
Options could include
nuclear and hydroelectric power
generation, as well as managing demand.»
Nuclear power is seen as a reliable source of energy and the chosen
option for future power
generation.
The panel contends that atomic energy is an
option for building a low - carbon society on grounds that
nuclear power
generation doesn't emit carbon dioxide.
Speaking on the opening day of the conference being held this week in Sochi, Russia, Rising said
nuclear energy had a vital role to play in the global energy mix, providing a strong foundation of reliable and low - carbon
generation to help support more variable clean energy
generation options.
Similarly, there is an ongoing reluctance to consider
nuclear as a low to zero Carbon
generation option among some pro-environmentalists.
Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next
generation technologies are available that make meaningful action on climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on climate change will depend heavily on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix of
options, with some actions such as tax incentives for
nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against climate risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.
International media coverage has typically assumed that Japan must expand its electricity
generation from coal, oil, and natural gas if
nuclear is no longer an
option.
New
nuclear generation has not been an
option in many areas, as there have been prohibitive technical, environmental and political challenges associated with building and operating new
nuclear plants.
A recent OECD study projects a 3 c / kWh cost for coal
generation in China, a 3.6 c / kWh cost for gas, and a 3 - 3.6 c / kWh cost for
nuclear, the cheapest non-emitting
option (all assuming a 5 % discount rate).
There are more electricity
generation options (
nuclear, CCGT) than transportation fuel
options.
Nuclear reactors, particularily
generation IV, should be given there due as a potential no regret
option.
Not it is your argument that PV will make electricity
generation less secure because a purported low LCOE will make it uneconomic to run reliable baseload plant of which the only realistic
options are coal and
nuclear.
Energy efficiency is included in those
options, along with renewable energy,
nuclear power, natural gas
generation, improvements to power plants, and many more.
While the need for
nuclear power is absolutely critical in meeting our base load requirements (and reducing CO2 emissions, and reducing fuel risk by having a diversified
generation portfolio of power plants)-- peaking load and
generation options to meet this load (which solar currently fits into) is important also.
In addition, the budget provides nearly $ 29 million to conduct advanced
nuclear reactor RD&D, in particular for the development of next -
generation SMR's that offer different fuel mix, fuel cycle, and cooling
options.
:: Hyperion Power
Generation and:: New Mexico Business Weekly
Nuclear Power A
Nuclear Hot Tub in Your Backyard New
Generation of
Nuclear Power Plants More Expensive Than Expected More Money for Yucca Mountain Makes It Hard to Get Behind
Nuclear Option
We have to quickly implement power
generation facilities appropriate for every region on earth, for some
nuclear may be the best
option, for others, wind, geothermal, hydro, photo voltaics..
The results should emerge soon, but in its evidence to the Select Committee, Scottish and Southern Electricity plc said that, while shale gas was a viable if relatively small
option for the UK (compared to the US), «there is a concern that with limited capital for investment in the energy industry, significant development of policy incentives to encourage development of shale gas resources in the UK, alongside uncontrolled growth in gas - fired
generation could decrease investor certainty on UK policy direction towards renewables, CCS and / or
nuclear.