One respected and seasoned observer of Britain's
nuclear policy believes there will be a fudge.
Not exact matches
«I don't
believe that retaining the documents is a violation of the [Iran deal] per se,» says James Acton, the director of the Carnegie Endowment's
nuclear policy program.
Though I disagree intensely with President Reagan's
nuclear policy, I
believe he desires peace in the world as much as I do.
Four non-parties to the treaty are known or
believed to possess
nuclear weapons: India, Pakistan and North Korea have openly tested and declared that they possess
nuclear weapons, while Israel has had a
policy of opacity regarding its own
nuclear weapons program.
A
policy of deterrence is useless against terrorists, and is less useful against «rogue states» such as Iran and North Korea, both of which are
believed to possess
nuclear weapons, because their motivations are not easily understood.
However his
policy platform of unilaterally scrapping Trident
nuclear weapons, opposing austerity, large - scale renationalisation and possibly backing an exit from the European Union will put off many MPs — especially if they
believe his leadership will not last long.
«I have been clear and consistent that I
believe it is the right
policy for the country to maintain a minimum credible
nuclear deterrent, while working to advance global
nuclear disarmament I am determined to continue making the case for Labour to have strong, credible Defence and security
policies, and I feel that the most effective way for me to continue to do this is from the backbenches.
Targets for
nuclear power range from 35 % of generating capacity down to zero — a total
nuclear phaseout — although those close to the deliberations
believe the government will settle on 15 % when it finalizes the
policy this summer.
P. Balaram, a molecular biophysicist and director of the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, and 60 others last week wrote an open letter to the public, stating: «We strongly
believe that India must radically review its
nuclear power
policy for appropriateness, safety, costs, and public acceptance, and undertake an independent, transparent safety audit of all its
nuclear facilities, which involves non-Department of Atomic Energy experts and civil society organisations.