Not exact matches
Instead, the US government says fallout is a greater concern in the
event of a
terrorist's
nuclear detonation, which would be close to the ground.
But critics question the safety of
nuclear power, citing such concerns as the potential for catastrophic meltdowns, their potential vulnerability to
terrorists, the lack of workable evacuation plans in the
event of accidents as well as the problem of dealing with radioactive waste.
The tragic
events of September 11, 2001, raise troubling questions about the vulnerability of
nuclear facilities to
terrorist attacks.
The
terrorist plot involves setting up an escalating series of
events to cause the United States and Russia to head straight into all - out
nuclear war, and the bomb is the tool to start the ball rolling.
Such
events are likely to include (whether actual or threatened) war, riot, civil strife,
terrorist activity, industrial dispute, natural or
nuclear disaster, adverse weather conditions, fire, epidemic, closure of rail lines, stations, airports or airspace and all similar
events outside our or our suppliers» control.
Events like these rise from natural and technological systems and even from humanity itself; for example, a tsunami half a planet large, a broken
nuclear power plant or collapsed oil platform, or a
terrorist attack such as the one that happened on 9/11.