Sentences with phrase «nuclear waste»
Nuclear waste refers to radioactive materials that are produced as a byproduct of nuclear reactions, such as those taking place in power plants or during the production of nuclear weapons. Full definition
He talked about his company, by using big data and big computers, is attempting to solve the malaria crisis or what to do with nuclear waste in new ways.
lawyerist.com
If they decide to pay the risk surcharge at the same time, they will then be free of all responsibilities for nuclear waste storage.
I'd love to have a working safe solution for nuclear waste — but we don't.
It can be adapted to recycle spent elements from other reactors, turning nuclear waste from a liability into an asset.
A found poetry / ruins exploration game in which you explore hypothetical versions of nuclear waste disposal sites created to keep people out for ten thousand years.
Problems with implementing the federal nuclear waste repository program.
He said the research could also inform ways to produce glass suitable for storing nuclear waste more effectively than current practices.
Will living in the vicinity of a high - level nuclear waste disposal site be hazardous to one's health?
Something could be missing from your next electric bill: a fee that electric customers have been paying for 31 years to fund a federal nuclear waste site that doesn't exist.
Participants were just as likely to quote uranium mining, or nuclear waste management and transport, as negatives.
It is perfectly safe and provides an opportunity to recycle existing nuclear waste into hundreds of years of energy.
The thing about nuclear waste is that it's the only waste from electricity production that is safely contained anywhere.
Using just our existing nuclear waste, we can power the entire planet for centuries.
Is there no way to eliminate the risks of proliferation, reduce nuclear waste, and make the plant safe from terrorism and meltdown, all while making the reactor cheaply?
The country needs a better way to manage nuclear waste as well.
How do you handle nuclear waste that will be radioactive for millions of years, keeping it from harming people and the environment?
It is a strong and compelling case that, when combined with the extraordinary impacts of the project on the country, clearly calls for a change in national nuclear waste policy and direction.
The main point of his piece is that we currently store commercial nuclear waste on site where it is produced.
, solar has no fuel costs, no risk of fuel cost increases, and no water or air pollution, coal ash clean - up, or nuclear waste costs.
Existing nuclear reactors use less than 1 % of the energy in uranium, leaving more than 99 % in long - lived nuclear waste.
But it is quite wrong to compare the risk from CO2 leakage with nuclear waste leakage.
Another has the player collecting nuclear waste after purchasing an old dock.
The government hopes to set a fixed unit price for the disposal of nuclear waste which will be «over and above expected costs».
While nuclear waste is contained in heavy drums and regularly monitored, very little has been done to deal with solar waste.
On top of that at least some of the current nuclear waste we have could be used as fuel for these reactors, this making our current waste problem less of an issue.
This leaves nuclear waste in storage in 121 temporary facilities in 39 states — sites that are vulnerable both to leakage and to terrorist attacks.
Instead, the federal government can deploy existing technology to keep nuclear waste permanently decentralized, as it is now.
Also, one of the only ways to really destroy nuclear waste is to burn it in fast reactors.
If you have difficulty with that concept, think about how much your home will be worth when they find just a little nuclear waste in your backyard.
Chef's note: This sauce has a shelf life longer than most nuclear waste but refrigerate after opening.
We can not harness nuclear waste for thousands of years, and coal is a dirty killer from the moment a mine is begun.
In the meantime, nuclear waste continues to accumulate at nuclear reactor sites, with nearly three - quarters of it sitting in increasingly crowded cooling pools, with no end in sight.
Someone needs to point out that while high - grade nuclear waste might take 20,000 years to completely break down, CO2 is forever.
Keeping nuclear waste locked down for 100,000 years is daunting enough, but carbon dioxide is forever.
We do not know the true extent of damage nuclear waste will cause with its 1/2 life of some 20,000 year.
Why not build a machine that converts nuclear waste into energy?
If an American used nuclear power their entire life, they would produce enough nuclear waste to fill a soda can.
There is no question nuclear waste is hazardous and should be properly stored.
Yet, no country has developed an acceptable or permanent method for high — level nuclear waste storage, thereby leaving both present and future generations at great risk.
To evaluate ceramic waste form performance over the time scales needed to store nuclear waste, around 100,000 years, scientists need a thorough understanding of the fundamental physics at the atomic level.
The existing plants, many of which have been in operation for decades mostly continue to hold their high level nuclear waste on - site.