Sentences with phrase «nuclear weapons»

"Nuclear weapons" refers to very powerful and destructive bombs that use the energy released from splitting the nucleus of atoms. They are designed to cause extensive damage and harm people, buildings, and the environment on a massive scale. Full definition
How can we justify the assumption that we should, at a given point in a military conflict, initiate the use of nuclear weapons in order to avoid a conventional defeat?
The proliferation of nuclear weapons in all of these countries is of grave concern.
As a matter of fact I think that when they get the chance they will use nuclear weapons on somebody, next year perhaps.
The bill provides strong national security investments, including increases above fiscal year 2017 for nuclear weapons programs.
We are dedicated to ensuring nuclear weapons testing never again threatens our public health.
The current solution limits both the power of states with nuclear weapons and the chances of nuclear war.
Remember The Challenge of Peace, their statement on nuclear weapons in 1983.
Are there any ways that he can gain from nuclear weapons without using them?
Any technologically advanced nation has the knowledge to pursue developing nuclear weapons if it chooses to do so.
The wisdom — or lack thereof — of pursuing or retaining nuclear weapons as a status symbol is another.
All remaining plans for building nuclear weapons were dropped by 1988.
And we are all frightened at the prospect of the use of nuclear weapons by terrorists against innocent civilian populations.
Well the moral arguments about nuclear weapons are just as compelling if not more so.
Not only did they become the first and only nation to use nuclear weapons against another, they did it twice.
A new report highlights private investments in companies that work on nuclear weapons systems.
The big headline rhetoric is a world without nuclear weapons.
Because they offer a means of killing lots of people (soldiers or civilians) to countries who can not possess nuclear weapons.
The pits could, for example, be fitted into new nuclear weapons at a later time.
They both secretly pursued nuclear weapons capability beginning in the late»60s to early»70s.
As a result we are set to spend # 97 billion on new nuclear weapons at a time when public spending faces deep cuts.
Your spy has stolen the secret plans to an Iranian nuclear weapons facility.
The island nation does not need the potent powder to construct more nuclear weapons, and spends billions of British pounds to ensure that others don't steal it for that purpose.
Using nuclear weapons does not fit into the «If I felt the American people needed to know...» category.
To detect very small quantities of mobile radioactive elements in the groundwater at former nuclear weapons production sites, researchers have developed a new type of sensor.
That's the political equivalent of introducing nuclear weapons into a conventional war.
It has never confirmed or denied owning nuclear weapons but is widely believed to possess them.
The ongoing campaign to ban nuclear weapons uses similar language.
Loss or damage, liability or expenses directly / indirectly happens due to war, invasion, nuclear weapon material, etc..
The real problem in an Ice Age would come from the competition for resources that are suddenly more scarce combined with nuclear weapon technology.
To regain prestige and security, the German government wanted nuclear weapons.
You could, in fact, you could set off — you could drop nuclear weapons inside hurricane, a hurricane is just going to go right through it.
If we can understand and change the attitudes, we can eliminate nuclear weapons.
Why should anyone be worried about a nation using nuclear weapons when it never has and isn't threatening to?
Not to mention that it isn't necessary to deliver nuclear weapons by missile.
In the universal network we can not accept the presence of nuclear weapons because even a small change can trigger it.
The world is in the midst of an unprecedented wave of negotiations aimed at saving global agreements to keep nuclear weapons in check.
The couple you mention were executed because the sketches they sent were of nuclear weapon designs.
Many of the scientists who signed the letter are well - regarded physicists and have advised federal policy - makers on nuclear weapons issues at various points in their careers.
It is just immoral and dangerous, rather like nuclear weapons.
In that kind of war a tactical nuclear weapon would be used with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory.
It's possible, he says, to stuff a small nuclear weapon into a satellite.
Russian nuclear weapons are targeted at South Korean military installations.
Other nuclear powers don't operate under the same logic and therefore don't need to build as many nuclear weapons.
The only problem is, that they keep producing nuclear weapons.
Meanwhile, nuclear weapons leaves them with two threats.
A collapse of civilization is possible through nuclear weapons, and through loss of vital environmental resources.
Last week, the end suddenly triggered even though countless nuclear weapons still exist within the game.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z