The FBI «expert» on nuclear winter doesn't mention anything about why that would have happened.
Does this mean that the hypothesis of
nuclear winter does not survive testing by modern climate models?
Not exact matches
Dipoto's top draft picks Kyle Lewis, Joe Rizzo, Evan White and Sam Carlson all remain, as
do most other recent draftees who look to help out the big - league team before we achieve
nuclear winter, if we're lucky.
You're not exactly hunkering down for a
nuclear winter, but if you can
do a bit of batch cooking for the freezer to make things easier in the first few weeks then you'll feel smug if nothing else.
Mammoths didn't stand a chance, says Northern Arizona University space scientist Ted Bunch: «If the fires and the shock wave didn't get them, there was a
nuclear winter that blocked out the sun and made eating difficult.»
I think this shows that the Russians hoped to use
nuclear winter for propaganda, but this
does not make
nuclear winter false.
Maybe dropping a few
nuclear warheads into volcanos to induce a
nuclear winter would
do the trick.
The bit of research that Sagan
did that made an impact was the TTAPS «
Nuclear Winter» study, which was arguably an example of political activism more than climate modeling.
While I
do remember one unusually cold
winter in the last 10 years when we had snow on the ground until the end of March because it just wouldn't get warm enough to thaw (France actually ran out of power for their electrical heating that year, leading to huge imports from Germany, because
nuclear plants just don't adapt well to demand), normally we should be in spring by now.
In fact, for
winter 2018/2019 (December through March), ISO New England forecasts a
winter peak demand of 650 MW less than it
did one year ago — a reduction roughly equivalent in size to the Pilgrim
nuclear power plant in Plymouth, MA.
What
does Ogarkov say in his published books about
nuclear winter, if anything?
I think this shows that the Russians hoped to use
nuclear winter for propaganda, but this
does not make
nuclear winter false.
Evidently, Mr. Seitz he is so smart that he doesn't need a Ph.D. [See Lawrence Badash, «A
Nuclear Winter's Tale,» page 249.]
What
do Russell Seitz and the FBI authors of the white paper have to say about the «hoax» of
nuclear winter and the «notorious lack of scientific integrity» of our climate scientists now?
The white paper was written by someone who didn't research
nuclear winter at all.