Also, we shouldn't worry about Iran getting
nukes because modern atomic theory is «just a theory».
Pakistan refrained from using
nukes because they know once they use it against India there will be no Pakistan on World Map.
Not exact matches
In other words, the «deplorables» didn't vote for Trump
because they wanted a wall between the U.S. and Mexico or they wanted to
nuke North Korea off the map, they voted for a Republican
because the previous Democrat took money from their savings account.
On one occasion, these two hotheads wanted to
nuke an entire village
because they wouldn't let them spend the night (Luke 9:51 - 56).
Crossan thinks this message of nonviolence is so urgent
because now we have nuclear weapons, and he suggests that some fool fundamentalist will use these
nukes to bring about the Apocalypse.
You might even hurt millions, or billions (and its just plain dumb luck, as you can see from the war mongering and stupidity of «religious» political leaders, like McCain, et al, who have said it would be a dandy idea to
nuke Iran, that the body count has been higher due to people with lots of weapons, and countries full of people, who where duped into following insane people,
because they where tired of the failure of priests to make the world better.)
While everyone gets worked into a frenzy and lathered up in the emotional fight of us and them... the powers that be (bildenbergs, or whomever) are setting the stage for a nice little
nuke drop... somewhere...
because we all know what this is truly about, too many people and too few resources.
Well, I'm sure either way everything will be okay
because Neville Chamberlin, er uh I mean President Obama has it in writing that we will have «peace in our time», or uh I mean assurance from Putin that they won't build a
nuke.
I don't really have a go - to meal
because I cook in batches to male 6 - 8 meals at a time, so then all I have to do is
nuke and nom.
(apparently i didn't roll the dough out quite thin enough
because it wasn't fully cooked inside when i made it — but a quick
nuke fixed that).
Japan was unwilling to surrender after Hiroshima
because their thinking was that the United States couldn't make another
nuke that fast.
This excludes a few very advanced weapons that no country is willing to sell and nuclear weapons
because the political consequences wouldn't be worth it to any nation with good nuclear weapons (North Korea would be willing to sell them since they are already a pariah state so they've got nothing to lose but they aren't anywhere close to good
nukes).
The question assumes that all of the friction is only
because North Korea has pursued
nukes.
OTOH, the Big Countries on the block sometimes have the power to stop other countries from having
nukes - and note that they are not usually successful
because they don't have THAT much power (witness Iran - despite all the posturing, the effective rate of success of everyone else in stopping - or even slowing down - their nuclear program is slightly below that of stopping Russians from drinking alcohol during their Prohibition in 1980s).
It failed to convince them to give up their weapons
because as stated earlier, they perceived
nukes as necessary for their survival against India.
Especially since USA is a lot less worried about
nukes in Iran compared to say KSA which you didn't even mention (I'll randomly guess
because it doesn't fit your own bias that this is all about Israel)
Therefore, the US can
nuke an SLBM launch platform (i.e., an enemy nuclear submarine carrying missiles) without it being a weapon of mass destruction
because it's used against a military target.
I had a question
because I am really interested in purchasing your nascent atomic iodine and our family has had thyroid issues and my mother had a thyroidectomy a couple of years ago
because she developed cancer on her thyroid and my brother also had his «
nuked»
because he had «hyperthyroid storm».
I guess the issue with the plot is basically its meaningless
because in the end everyone gets
nuked so... there was no need for the Predator really.
Your old sponsor isn't answering your e-mails,
because he knows you're just looking for free parts for the
nuked motor.
I doublechecked Chapter 18 and realized there was another minor scene with Celoren that I could completely
nuke — partly
because it didn't really advance the plot much, and partly
because removing it also addressed one of the various issues from Carina's editor.
The fundamental problem with the
Nuked Berry scenario is that
because the device is stuck in a permanent reboot sequence or loop, when you attach it your computer via USB cable it simply connects and disconnects over and over and over again (you'll just keep hearing that USB detected / unplugged noise) as the BlackBerry turns on / off.
Today's lecture isn't really a «newbie» topic, but it's one that I wanted to cover
because in the past three weeks I've gone through it half a dozen times and that is Reloading the Operating System on a BlackBerry that's totally «
Nuked».
Ummm maybe
because the leaders are psyco and unlike us who are hesitaint to drop
nukes it looks like they'll do it just to get some attention.
I don't take proponents of either
nukes or industrial sequestration seriously
because of this (not that they aren't dangerous).
I for one am glad
nukes are being forced to be orders of magnitude safer than coal
because the risks are orders of magnitude greater
South Carolina's utility cancelled their
nuke under construction
because of multi billion dollar cost overruns.
That's not true, 1)
because most coastal
nuke plants have cooling towers, and 2) climate - driven sea level rise isn't of the 30 - meter magnitude that did Fukushima in, and even if it were, there's time to adapt.
Because really, why would you landfill your vacuum - packed poop or
nuke it in an electrochemical reactor when It can heat your house?
The idea is to avoid extra ionizing radiation, especially the kinds coming from
nuke plants and
nuke weapons and medical xrays, when possible
because there is always the chance that they can cause DNA damage.
For example, France has a very low average rate of CO2 per unit of GDP
because of its
nukes, but its marginal growth is met mostly with fossil fuels.